species richness, where summer exclosure and rewilding have statistically significant higher mean values (log-transformed) than the full exclosure treatment. When both treatment, location and block are considered, the model is able to explain 64.18 percent of the total deviance in richness between sites. Treatment overall accounts for 10.44% out of the 64.18% explained deviance, without being statistically significant.
A similar pattern is seen for unicity, where the summer exclosure treatment mean is 54% higher than that of the full exclosure treatment. Here, the model is able to explain 60.90% of the total deviance, with treatment being statistically significant and accounting for 17.08% of total deviance.
There are no statistically significant effects of treatment on the forbs to graminoid ration. it is, however, interesting to note the high difference between the groups means where winter exclosure and summer exclosure had a 66% and 96% higher mean ratio than full exclosure.