Sven Weber

and 8 more

Our limited knowledge about the ecological drivers of global arthropod decline highlights the urgent need for more effective biodiversity monitoring approaches. Monitoring of arthropods is commonly performed using passive trapping devices, which reliably recover diverse communities, but provide little ecological information on the sampled taxa. Especially the manifold interactions of arthropods with plants are barely understood. A promising strategy to overcome this shortfall is environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of arthropods from plant material they have interacted with. However, the accuracy of this approach has not been sufficiently tested. In four experiments, we exhaustively test the comparative performance of plant-derived eDNA from surface washes of plants and homogenized plant material against traditional monitoring approaches. We show that the recovered communities of plant-derived eDNA and traditional approaches only partly overlap, with eDNA recovering various additional cryptic taxa. This suggests eDNA as a useful complementary tool to traditional monitoring. Despite the differences in recovered taxa, estimates of community α- and β-diversity between both approaches are well correlated, highlighting the utility of eDNA as a broad scale tool for community monitoring. Last, eDNA outperforms traditional approaches in the recovery of plant-specific arthropod communities. Unlike traditional monitoring, eDNA revealed fine-scaled community differentiation between individual plants and even within plant compartments. Especially specialized herbivores are better recovered with eDNA. Our results highlight the value of plant derived eDNA analysis for large-scale biodiversity assessments that include information about community level interactions.

Emma Steigerwald

and 7 more

The term ‘habitat fragmentation’ is frequently associated with the biologically-destructive activities of human development, but an important evolutionary hypothesis posits that much of the biodiversity we see today was generated by episodic, natural habitat fragmentation. This hypothesis suggests that fragmentation can serve as a ‘crucible of evolution’ through the amplifying feedbacks of colonization, extinction, adaptation, and speciation. Interrogating the generality of this hypothesis requires measuring the repercussions of fragmentation at intra- and interspecific levels across entire communities. We use DNA metabarcoding to capture these repercussions from the scales of intraspecific differentiation to community composition in a megadiverse, ecologically foundational group, arthropods, using a natural habitat fragmentation experiment on patches of wet forest isolated by contemporary Hawaiian lava flows (kīpuka). We find a pronounced effect of area in kīpuka cores, where the taxonomic richness supported by a kīpuka scales with its size. Kīpuka cores exhibit higher intra- and interspecific turnover over space than continuous forest. Additionally, open lava, kīpuka edges, and the cores of small kīpuka (which are essentially entirely “edge”) host lower richness, are more biologically homogeneous, and have higher proportions of non-native taxa than kīpuka cores. Our work shows how habitat fragmentation isolates entire communities of habitat specialists, paving the way for genetic differentiation. Parsing the extent to which differentiation in kīpuka is driven by local adaptation versus drift provides a promising future avenue for understanding how fragmentation, and the different isolated communities created through this process, may lead to speciation in this system.

Brent Emerson

and 22 more