According to Wendel, ROD is an “inquiry into the moral accountability of professionals” (1995, p. 62). Stevens’ moral accountability as a professional can be explained by his act of trying to delink Lord Darlington and Britain from the charges of anti-Semitism. He confirms that Lord Darlington had met Sir Oswald Mosley a couple of times but, he adds, only before the organisation had “turned its true nature” (Ishiguro, 1989, p. 101). Organisations such as British Union of Fascist, claims Stevens, “were a complete irrelevance to the heart of political life” in England (1989, p. 101). Were they irrelevant, one might ask? This can be answered by referring to the Britain’s infamous policy of “appeasement” before the war (Britain’s Policy of Appeasement: The Coming of War, 2022). And also by the fact that Lord Darlington’s dismissal of two Jewish maids which to Stevens seems to be “a minor episode” and “an untypical incident” (1989, p. 101,104). The reasons Lord Darlington cites as to the dismissal of them as saying, “In the interests of the guests we have staying here”, and “for the good of this house”, “We cannot have Jews on the staff here at Darlington Hall” (1989, p. 105). The reasons for such orders Stevens tells us is that Darlington had been under the influence of Mrs Carolyn Barnet, “a member of Sir Oswald Mosley’s ‘blackshirts’ organization” (1989, p. 104).