The above passages are perhaps the most illuminating definitions of the type of professionalism Indian “godi” media has been demonstrating since 2014. Under what category does the Indian “godi” media fall, one could ask? Do they further the cause of humanity or of their political masters? In part, to both. The very idea that some commentators have categorised them as “godi” media, or “Modia” [combining Modi and media], testifies to the latter (Kumar, 2019, p. 35). Unlike Stevens, who gives up his private affairs in service to his professional self, the anchors of “godi” media primetime debates do the opposite, that is, they “abandon their professional being for the private one at the least provocation” (1989, p. 42).He does not seem to have any agency in matters related to his master and the Darlington Hall. All that he does is accept what his master thinks is right however wrong that thought or decision might turn out to be.