Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes of Ross versus Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement
*Chelsea D. Wenos, MD1;*Jeremy L. Herrmann, MD1,2; Lava R. Timsina, MPH, PhD1,3; Parth M. Patel, MD1; John W. Fehrenbacher, MD1,4 and John W. Brown, MD1,2
1Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery2Riley Children’s Health, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN 3Indiana University School of Medicine, Center for Outcomes Research in Surgery, Indianapolis, IN, Department of Surgery 4Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery*Co-authors
Funding Statement: None
Conflict of Interest Disclosure(s): None
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval/Waiver: #1801868334
Patient Consent Statement: None as this was a retrospective chart review with no interaction or contact with subjects which was granted in accordance with IRB policies.
Clinical Trial Registration: None
Running Head/Short Title: Ross versus Mechanical AVR
Word Count: 4509
Corresponding Author: Chelsea D. Wenos, MD who can be reached at chelsea.wenos@unmc.edu