Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes of Ross versus Mechanical Aortic
Valve Replacement
*Chelsea D. Wenos, MD1;*Jeremy L. Herrmann, MD1,2; Lava R.
Timsina, MPH, PhD1,3; Parth M. Patel,
MD1; John W. Fehrenbacher, MD1,4 and
John W. Brown, MD1,2
1Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis,
IN, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery2Riley Children’s Health, Indiana University Health,
Indianapolis, IN 3Indiana University School of
Medicine, Center for Outcomes Research in Surgery, Indianapolis, IN,
Department of Surgery 4Indiana University Health
Methodist Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery*Co-authors
Funding Statement: None
Conflict of Interest Disclosure(s): None
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval/Waiver: #1801868334
Patient Consent Statement: None as this was a retrospective
chart review with no interaction or contact with subjects which was
granted in accordance with IRB policies.
Clinical Trial Registration: None
Running Head/Short Title: Ross versus Mechanical AVR
Word Count: 4509
Corresponding Author: Chelsea D. Wenos, MD who can be reached
at chelsea.wenos@unmc.edu