TABLE S1 Evaluation results of MaxEnt model under different
parameter setting of Satyrium ciliatum, Satyrium
nepalense, Satyrium yunnanense
For S. ciliatum ,
under the MaxEnt default
parameter, the RM = 1, FC = LQPHT, and Delta AICc = 26.990. When RM =
0.5, FC = LQ, and Delta AICC = 0, the model is optimal (Table S1).
Therefore, RM = 0.5 and FC = LQ were selected as the model’s final
parameters (Figure 2). Under modified parameters, the average values of
AUC and TSS indicated an accurate prediction result with values of 0.994
and 0.939 (Figure 3). For S. nepalense , under the MaxEnt default
parameter, RM = 1, FC = LQPHT, and Delta AICc = 217.062. When RM = 0.5,
FC = LQH, Delta AICC = 0, the model is optimal (Table S1). Therefore, RM
= 0.5 and FC = LQH were selected as the model’s final parameters (Figure
2). Under the modified parameters, the average values of AUC and TSS
indicated an accurate prediction result with values of 0.941 and 0.890
(Figure 3). For S. yunnanense , under the MaxEnt default
parameter, RM = 1, FC = LQPHT, and Delta AICc = 40.356. When RM = 1.5,
FC = LQ, Delta AICC = 0, the model is optimal (Table S1). Therefore, RM
= 1.5 and FC = LQ were selected as the final parameters of the model
(Figure 2). Under the modified parameters, the average values of AUC and
TSS indicated an accurate prediction result with values of 0.981 and
0.894 (Figure 3).
FIGURE 2 Evaluation
metrics of MaxEnt generated by ENMeval
FIGURE 3 Model evaluation
results of AUC value and TSS value