Figure legends
Figure 1. Maps showing the sampled localities for the putative species belonging to the E. ruidum complex that were delimited in this study: a) red: E. ruidum sp. 1; b) green: E. ruidumsp. 2; c) yellow: E. ruidum sp. 3; violet: E. ruidum sp. 4; black: E. ruidum sp. “Pinotepa + Guerrero”.
Figure 2. Summary of the results obtained with the different sources of information examined in this study: a) hierarchical cluster dendrogram built with the dataset of the simplified CHCs profile of theE. ruidum species complex; b) bayesian phylogram derived from the 3RAD dataset (minimum sample locus = 30); c) ML phylogram derived from the UCEs dataset (95% taxon occupancy matrix); d) haplotype network reconstructed with the cox1 dataset.
Figure 3 . Patterns of genetic structure and admixture among the examined populations based on the 3RAD dataset (98_33 matrix) for values of population differentiation (K) from 2 to 8.
Figure 4 . Pearson’s product-moment correlation between CHC and 3RAD, UCEs and cox1 distances.