REFERENCES
1. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. American Society for Reproductive Medicine position statement on uterus transplantation: a committee opinion. Fertility and sterility . 2018;110:605-10.
2. Johannesson L, Testa G, Putman JM, McKenna GJ, Koon EC, York JR, et al. Twelve Live Births After Uterus Transplantation in the Dallas UtErus Transplant Study. Obstetrics and gynecology . 2021;137:241-49.
3. Jones BP, Saso S, Bracewell-Milnes T, Thum MY, Nicopoullos J, Diaz-Garcia C, et al. Human uterine transplantation: a review of outcomes from the first 45 cases. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology . 2019;126:1310-19.
4. Tummers P, Goker M, Dahm-Kahler P, Brannstrom M, Tullius SG, Rogiers X, et al. Meeting Report: First State-of-the-Art Meeting on Uterus Transplantation. Transplantation . 2019;103:455-58.
5. Testa G, McKenna GJ, Bayer J, Wall A, Fernandez H, Martinez E, et al. The Evolution of Transplantation From Saving Lives to Fertility Treatment: DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study). Ann Surg . 2020;272:411-17.
6. Richards EG, Agatisa PK, Davis AC, Flyckt R, Mabel H, Falcone T, et al. Framing the diagnosis and treatment of absolute uterine factor infertility: Insights from in-depth interviews with uterus transplant trial participants. AJOB empirical bioethics . 2019;10:23-35.
7. Jarvholm S, Enskog A, Hammarling C, Dahm-Kahler P, Brannstrom M. Uterus transplantation: joys and frustrations of becoming a ’complete’ woman-a qualitative study regarding self-image in the 5-year period after transplantation. Hum Reprod . 2020;35:1855-63.
8. Wall AE, Johannesson L, Sok M, Warren AM, Gordon EJ, Testa G. Decision making and informed consent in uterus transplant recipients: A mixed-methods study of the Dallas uterus transplant study (DUETS) participants. Am J Surg . 2021.
9. Wall AE, Johannesson L, Testa G, Warren AM. Two Cases of Pregnancy Following Uterine Transplant: An Ethical Analysis. Narrat Inq Bioeth . 2020;10:263-68.
10. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care . 2007;19:349-57.
11. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2007.
12. Kleinman A, Benson P. Anthropology in the clinic: the problem of cultural competency and how to fix it. PLoS Med . 2006;3:e294.
13. Leventhal H, Benyamini Y, Brownlee S, Diefenbach M, Leventhal EA, Patrick-Miller L, et al. Illness representations: Theoretical foundations. In: Petrie KJ, Weinman JA, editors. Perceptions of health and illness: Current research and applications. London: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1997. p. 19–45.
14. Wall AE, Johannesson L, Testa G, Warren AM, Gordon EM. Developing interview guides for a mixed methods study of uterus transplant recipients, their living donors, and their respective partners. Ethical issues in Uterus Transplantation and Innovative Research in Reproductive Medicine, Preconference of the International Society of Uterus Transplantation. Cleveland, OH.; 2019.
15. Testa G, Koon EC, Johannesson L, McKenna GJ, Anthony T, Klintmalm GB, et al. Living Donor Uterus Transplantation: A Single Center’s Observations and Lessons Learned From Early Setbacks to Technical Success. American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons . 2017;17:2901-10.
16. Johannesson L, Koon EC, Bayer J, McKenna GJ, Wall A, Fernandez H, et al. DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study): Early Outcomes and Complications of Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy for Living Uterus Donors.Transplantation . 2021;105:225-30.
17. Ramani A, Testa G, Ghouri Y, Koon EC, Di Salvo M, McKenna GJ, et al. DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study): Complete report of 6-month and initial 2-year outcomes following open donor hysterectomy.Clinical transplantation . 2020;34:e13757.
18. Testa G, McKenna GJ, Gunby RT, Jr., Anthony T, Koon EC, Warren AM, et al. First live birth after uterus transplantation in the United States. American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons . 2018;18:1270-74.
19. QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo (Version 12). 2018 [cited 11 June 2021]; Available from: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home
20. Srnka KJ, Koeszegi ST. From Words to Numbers: How to Transform Qualitative Data into Meaningful Quantitative Results.Schmalenbach Bus Rev . 2007;59:29-57.
21. Onwuegbuzie AJ, Teddlie C. A Framework for Analyzing Data in Mixed Methods Research In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, editors. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003. p. 351-83.
22. Caracelli VJ, Greene JC. Data Analysis Strategies for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis . 1993;15:195-207.
23. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Qualitative methods. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2018. p. 179-212.
24. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2014 [cited 11 June 2021]; Available from: http://www.R-project.org/