References Cited
1. Ayers B, Sandholm T, Gosev I, Prasad S, Kilic A, Using Machine Learning to Improve Survival Prediction After Heart Transplantation Surgery. Journal Of Cardiac Surgery, 2021.
2. Nilsson, J., et al., The International Heart Transplant Survival Algorithm (IHTSA): A New Model to Improve Organ Sharing and Survival. PLOS ONE, 2015. 10 (3): p. e0118644.
3. Weiss, E.S., et al., Creation of a quantitative recipient risk index for mortality prediction after cardiac transplantation (IMPACT).The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2011. 92 (3): p. 914-922.
4. Massie, A.B., L.M. Kucirka, and D.L. Segev, Big data in organ transplantation: registries and administrative claims. American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2014.14 (8): p. 1723-1730.
5. Hung, K. and Y.-T. Zhang, Implementation of a WAP-based telemedicine system for patient monitoring. IEEE transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 2003. 7 (2): p. 101-107.
6. Koehler, F., et al., Telemedical Interventional Monitoring in Heart Failure (TIM‐HF), a randomized, controlled intervention trial investigating the impact of telemedicine on mortality in ambulatory patients with heart failure: study design. European journal of heart failure, 2010. 12 (12): p. 1354-1362.
7. Low, C.A., et al., Fitbit step counts during inpatient recovery from cancer surgery as a predictor of readmission. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2018. 52 (1): p. 88-92.
8. Daligadu, J., et al., Validation of the Fitbit Flex in an acute post–cardiac surgery patient Population. Physiotherapy Canada, 2018.70 (4): p. 314-320.
9. Macapagal, F.R. and H.M. Rodriguez, CICU PreHeart Transplant 1A Patients Experiences Using Fitbit Activity Tracker in Their Own Words.
10. Macapagal, F.R., et al., Experiences of Pre-Heart Transplant Patients Using Fitbit as an Ambulation Measuring Device.
11. Macapagal, F.R., et al., Use of common technology (Fitbit) as an aid to increase ambulation among pre-heart transplant patients.
12. Hartman, S.J., S.H. Nelson, and L.S. Weiner, Patterns of Fitbit use and activity levels throughout a physical activity intervention: exploratory analysis from a randomized controlled trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. 6 (2): p. e8503.
13. Liao, Y., et al., Investigating the within-person relationships between activity levels and sleep duration using Fitbit data. Translational behavioral medicine, 2021. 11 (2): p. 619-624.
14. Rezaei, N. and M.A. Grandner, Changes in sleep duration, timing, and variability during the COVID-19 pandemic: Large-scale Fitbit data from 6 major US cities. Sleep Health, 2021.
15. Austin, C. and F. Kusumoto, The application of Big Data in medicine: current implications and future directions. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2016. 47 (1): p. 51-59.
16. Holden, R.J., Cognitive performance-altering effects of electronic medical records: an application of the human factors paradigm for patient safety. Cognition, Technology & Work, 2011.13 (1): p. 11-29.
17. Administration, U.F.A.D. Transforming FDA’s Approach to Digital Health . 2018 [cited July 2018; Available from: https://www.fda.gov/newsevents/speeches/ucm605697.htm.
18. Manogaran, G., et al., Machine learning based big data processing framework for cancer diagnosis using hidden Markov model and GM clustering. Wireless personal communications, 2018. 102 (3): p. 2099-2116.
19. Burdick, H., et al., Validation of a machine learning algorithm for early severe sepsis prediction: a retrospective study predicting severe sepsis up to 48 h in advance using a diverse dataset from 461 US hospitals. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. 20 (1): p. 1-10.
20. Fagerström, J., et al., LiSep LSTM: a machine learning algorithm for early detection of septic shock. Scientific reports, 2019. 9 (1): p. 1-8.
21. Parikh, M.N., H. Li, and L. He, Enhancing diagnosis of autism with optimized machine learning models and personal characteristic data. Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2019. 13 : p. 9.
22. Tariq, Q., et al., Mobile detection of autism through machine learning on home video: A development and prospective validation study.PLoS medicine, 2018. 15 (11): p. e1002705.
23. Buchlak, Q.D., et al., Machine learning applications to clinical decision support in neurosurgery: an artificial intelligence augmented systematic review. Neurosurgical review, 2020.43 (5): p. 1235-1253.
24. Kilic, A., Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cardiovascular health care. The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2020.109 (5): p. 1323-1329.
25. Tseng, P.-Y., et al., Prediction of the development of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery by machine learning. Critical Care, 2020. 24 (1): p. 1-13.
26. Tyler, N.S., et al., An artificial intelligence decision support system for the management of type 1 diabetes. Nature metabolism, 2020. 2 (7): p. 612-619.
27. Pappada, S.M., B.D. Cameron, and P.M. Rosman, Development of a neural network for prediction of glucose concentration in type 1 diabetes patients. Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2008.2 (5): p. 792-801.
28. Pappada, S.M., et al., Neural network-based real-time prediction of glucose in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes.Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2011. 13 (2): p. 135-141.
29. Syeda-Mahmood, T., Role of big data and machine learning in diagnostic decision support in radiology. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2018. 15 (3): p. 569-576.
30. Pirracchio, R., et al., Big data and targeted machine learning in action to assist medical decision in the ICU. Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, 2019. 38 (4): p. 377-384.
31. Pappada, S.M., et al., An artificial neural network-based predictive model to support optimization of inpatient glycemic control.Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2020. 22 (5): p. 383-394.
32. Pappada, S.M., et al., Evaluation of a model for glycemic prediction in critically ill surgical patients. PLoS One, 2013.8 (7): p. e69475.
33. Youssef Ali Amer, A., et al., Vital signs prediction and early warning score calculation based on continuous monitoring of hospitalised patients using wearable technology. Sensors, 2020. 20 (22): p. 6593.
34. Zhang, B., et al., Health data driven on continuous blood pressure prediction based on gradient boosting decision tree algorithm.IEEE Access, 2019. 7 : p. 32423-32433.
35. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, I., et al., Utility of big data in predicting short-term blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes mellitus through machine learning techniques. Sensors, 2019. 19 (20): p. 4482.
36. Raj, R., et al., Machine learning-based dynamic mortality prediction after traumatic brain injury. Scientific reports, 2019.9 (1): p. 1-13.
37. Gao, Y., et al., Machine learning based early warning system enables accurate mortality risk prediction for COVID-19. Nature communications, 2020. 11 (1): p. 1-10.
38. Daghistani, T.A., et al., Predictors of in-hospital length of stay among cardiac patients: A machine learning approach. International journal of cardiology, 2019. 288 : p. 140-147.
39. Thompson, B., K.O. Elish, and R. Steele. Machine learning-based prediction of prolonged length of stay in newborns . in2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) . 2018. IEEE.
40. Alsinglawi, B., et al. Predicting Length of Stay for Cardiovascular Hospitalizations in the Intensive Care Unit: Machine Learning Approach . in 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) . 2020. IEEE.
41. Ling, Y., et al., A prediction model for length of stay in the ICU among septic patients: A machine learning approach. Value in Health, 2018. 21 : p. S5.
42. Morgan, D.J., et al., Assessment of machine learning vs standard prediction rules for predicting hospital readmissions. JAMA network open, 2019. 2 (3): p. e190348-e190348.
43. Rojas, J.C., et al., Predicting intensive care unit readmission with machine learning using electronic health record data.Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2018. 15 (7): p. 846-853.
44. Jiang, S., et al., An integrated machine learning framework for hospital readmission prediction. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2018.146 : p. 73-90.
45. Miller, K., et al., Interface, information, interaction: a narrative review of design and functional requirements for clinical decision support. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2018. 25 (5): p. 585-592.
46. Bakken, S., Can informatics innovation help mitigate clinician burnout? 2019, Oxford University Press.
47. Mahadevaiah, G., et al., Artificial intelligence‐based clinical decision support in modern medical physics: selection, acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance. Medical physics, 2020. 47 (5): p. e228-e235.
48. Hunt, D.L., et al., Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Jama, 1998. 280 (15): p. 1339-1346.