References Cited
1. Ayers B, Sandholm T, Gosev I, Prasad S, Kilic A, Using Machine
Learning to Improve Survival Prediction After Heart Transplantation
Surgery. Journal Of Cardiac Surgery, 2021.
2. Nilsson, J., et al., The International Heart Transplant
Survival Algorithm (IHTSA): A New Model to Improve Organ Sharing and
Survival. PLOS ONE, 2015. 10 (3): p. e0118644.
3. Weiss, E.S., et al., Creation of a quantitative recipient risk
index for mortality prediction after cardiac transplantation (IMPACT).The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2011. 92 (3): p. 914-922.
4. Massie, A.B., L.M. Kucirka, and D.L. Segev, Big data in organ
transplantation: registries and administrative claims. American journal
of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of
Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2014.14 (8): p. 1723-1730.
5. Hung, K. and Y.-T. Zhang, Implementation of a WAP-based
telemedicine system for patient monitoring. IEEE transactions on
Information Technology in Biomedicine, 2003. 7 (2): p. 101-107.
6. Koehler, F., et al., Telemedical Interventional Monitoring in
Heart Failure (TIM‐HF), a randomized, controlled intervention trial
investigating the impact of telemedicine on mortality in ambulatory
patients with heart failure: study design. European journal of heart
failure, 2010. 12 (12): p. 1354-1362.
7. Low, C.A., et al., Fitbit step counts during inpatient recovery
from cancer surgery as a predictor of readmission. Annals of Behavioral
Medicine, 2018. 52 (1): p. 88-92.
8. Daligadu, J., et al., Validation of the Fitbit Flex in an acute
post–cardiac surgery patient Population. Physiotherapy Canada, 2018.70 (4): p. 314-320.
9. Macapagal, F.R. and H.M. Rodriguez, CICU PreHeart Transplant 1A
Patients Experiences Using Fitbit Activity Tracker in Their Own Words.
10. Macapagal, F.R., et al., Experiences of Pre-Heart Transplant
Patients Using Fitbit as an Ambulation Measuring Device.
11. Macapagal, F.R., et al., Use of common technology (Fitbit) as
an aid to increase ambulation among pre-heart transplant patients.
12. Hartman, S.J., S.H. Nelson, and L.S. Weiner, Patterns of
Fitbit use and activity levels throughout a physical activity
intervention: exploratory analysis from a randomized controlled trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. 6 (2): p. e8503.
13. Liao, Y., et al., Investigating the within-person
relationships between activity levels and sleep duration using Fitbit
data. Translational behavioral medicine, 2021. 11 (2): p.
619-624.
14. Rezaei, N. and M.A. Grandner, Changes in sleep duration,
timing, and variability during the COVID-19 pandemic: Large-scale Fitbit
data from 6 major US cities. Sleep Health, 2021.
15. Austin, C. and F. Kusumoto, The application of Big Data in
medicine: current implications and future directions. Journal of
Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2016. 47 (1): p.
51-59.
16. Holden, R.J., Cognitive performance-altering effects of
electronic medical records: an application of the human factors paradigm
for patient safety. Cognition, Technology & Work, 2011.13 (1): p. 11-29.
17. Administration, U.F.A.D. Transforming FDA’s Approach to
Digital Health . 2018 [cited July 2018; Available from:
https://www.fda.gov/newsevents/speeches/ucm605697.htm.
18. Manogaran, G., et al., Machine learning based big data
processing framework for cancer diagnosis using hidden Markov model and
GM clustering. Wireless personal communications, 2018. 102 (3):
p. 2099-2116.
19. Burdick, H., et al., Validation of a machine learning
algorithm for early severe sepsis prediction: a retrospective study
predicting severe sepsis up to 48 h in advance using a diverse dataset
from 461 US hospitals. BMC medical informatics and decision making,
2020. 20 (1): p. 1-10.
20. Fagerström, J., et al., LiSep LSTM: a machine learning
algorithm for early detection of septic shock. Scientific reports,
2019. 9 (1): p. 1-8.
21. Parikh, M.N., H. Li, and L. He, Enhancing diagnosis of autism
with optimized machine learning models and personal characteristic
data. Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2019. 13 : p. 9.
22. Tariq, Q., et al., Mobile detection of autism through machine
learning on home video: A development and prospective validation study.PLoS medicine, 2018. 15 (11): p. e1002705.
23. Buchlak, Q.D., et al., Machine learning applications to
clinical decision support in neurosurgery: an artificial intelligence
augmented systematic review. Neurosurgical review, 2020.43 (5): p. 1235-1253.
24. Kilic, A., Artificial intelligence and machine learning in
cardiovascular health care. The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2020.109 (5): p. 1323-1329.
25. Tseng, P.-Y., et al., Prediction of the development of acute
kidney injury following cardiac surgery by machine learning. Critical
Care, 2020. 24 (1): p. 1-13.
26. Tyler, N.S., et al., An artificial intelligence decision
support system for the management of type 1 diabetes. Nature
metabolism, 2020. 2 (7): p. 612-619.
27. Pappada, S.M., B.D. Cameron, and P.M. Rosman, Development of a
neural network for prediction of glucose concentration in type 1
diabetes patients. Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2008.2 (5): p. 792-801.
28. Pappada, S.M., et al., Neural network-based real-time
prediction of glucose in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes.Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2011. 13 (2): p. 135-141.
29. Syeda-Mahmood, T., Role of big data and machine learning in
diagnostic decision support in radiology. Journal of the American
College of Radiology, 2018. 15 (3): p. 569-576.
30. Pirracchio, R., et al., Big data and targeted machine learning
in action to assist medical decision in the ICU. Anaesthesia Critical
Care & Pain Medicine, 2019. 38 (4): p. 377-384.
31. Pappada, S.M., et al., An artificial neural network-based
predictive model to support optimization of inpatient glycemic control.Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2020. 22 (5): p. 383-394.
32. Pappada, S.M., et al., Evaluation of a model for glycemic
prediction in critically ill surgical patients. PLoS One, 2013.8 (7): p. e69475.
33. Youssef Ali Amer, A., et al., Vital signs prediction and early
warning score calculation based on continuous monitoring of hospitalised
patients using wearable technology. Sensors, 2020. 20 (22): p.
6593.
34. Zhang, B., et al., Health data driven on continuous blood
pressure prediction based on gradient boosting decision tree algorithm.IEEE Access, 2019. 7 : p. 32423-32433.
35. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, I., et al., Utility of big data in
predicting short-term blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes mellitus
through machine learning techniques. Sensors, 2019. 19 (20): p.
4482.
36. Raj, R., et al., Machine learning-based dynamic mortality
prediction after traumatic brain injury. Scientific reports, 2019.9 (1): p. 1-13.
37. Gao, Y., et al., Machine learning based early warning system
enables accurate mortality risk prediction for COVID-19. Nature
communications, 2020. 11 (1): p. 1-10.
38. Daghistani, T.A., et al., Predictors of in-hospital length of
stay among cardiac patients: A machine learning approach. International
journal of cardiology, 2019. 288 : p. 140-147.
39. Thompson, B., K.O. Elish, and R. Steele. Machine
learning-based prediction of prolonged length of stay in newborns . in2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and
Applications (ICMLA) . 2018. IEEE.
40. Alsinglawi, B., et al. Predicting Length of Stay for
Cardiovascular Hospitalizations in the Intensive Care Unit: Machine
Learning Approach . in 2020 42nd Annual International Conference
of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) . 2020.
IEEE.
41. Ling, Y., et al., A prediction model for length of stay in the
ICU among septic patients: A machine learning approach. Value in
Health, 2018. 21 : p. S5.
42. Morgan, D.J., et al., Assessment of machine learning vs
standard prediction rules for predicting hospital readmissions. JAMA
network open, 2019. 2 (3): p. e190348-e190348.
43. Rojas, J.C., et al., Predicting intensive care unit
readmission with machine learning using electronic health record data.Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2018. 15 (7): p.
846-853.
44. Jiang, S., et al., An integrated machine learning framework
for hospital readmission prediction. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2018.146 : p. 73-90.
45. Miller, K., et al., Interface, information, interaction: a
narrative review of design and functional requirements for clinical
decision support. Journal of the American Medical Informatics
Association, 2018. 25 (5): p. 585-592.
46. Bakken, S., Can informatics innovation help mitigate clinician
burnout? 2019, Oxford University Press.
47. Mahadevaiah, G., et al., Artificial intelligence‐based
clinical decision support in modern medical physics: selection,
acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance. Medical physics,
2020. 47 (5): p. e228-e235.
48. Hunt, D.L., et al., Effects of computer-based clinical
decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes:
a systematic review. Jama, 1998. 280 (15): p. 1339-1346.