Potential culprits for immediate hypersensitivity reactions to
BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: not just PEG
Anna Radice1, Filippo Fassio1, Elisa
Meucci1, Maria Chiara Loredana
Iorno1, Donatella Macchia1
1Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Ospedale San
Giovanni di Dio, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
Corresponding Author: Filippo Fassio, email:filippo.fassio@uslcentro.toscana.it,
tel: +39 329 7973033
To the Editor,
as severe allergic reactions to the first authorized COVID-19 vaccine,
BNT162b2 developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, were reported [1],
concern arose among clinicians and in the general population –
especially among allergic patients – with the possible consequence of
contributing to vaccination hesitancy.
The lipid nanoparticle (LNP) transporting the mRNA was immediately
considered as the possible target of the allergic response, as it hides
several potential culprits (Figure 1).
Among these, it has been noted that lipid ALC-0159 contains PEG-2000,
that belongs to the polyethylene glycols family, which are known to be
capable of inducing hypersensitivity reactions [1]. These are
polymers with similar structures but different molecular weight, which
are widely used in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics or foods thanks to their
solubility and stability [2].
Despite their ubiquity, however, immediate hypersensitivity reactions
are rare: thirty-seven cases were reported in the last 40 years [2].
Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated hypersensitivity is one of the suspected
mechanisms, and sensitization could have taken place during repeated
exposure of offended skin/mucosa to cross-reactive PEGs [2],
[3]. The PEGs’ multivalent structure favors cross-linking of FcεR1,
thus inducing mast cell degranulation.
Complement pathway activation by PEG has been proposed [5]; although
PEGs prevent opsonization, they could induce IgM and IgG production
[6]. Nevertheless is not a single PEG but the presence of highly
repetitive domains in LNP resembling a pathogen surface that can induce
the so-called complement activation-related pseudoallergy (CARPA)
[4]. The same mechanism can be advocated when engineered
nanomaterials, e.g. liposome and micellar drugs, bind on their surface
proteins creating a “biocorona”. And even more other pathways leading
to mast-cells degranulation have been identified [5] or postulated,
including direct mast cell activation and degranulation [6].
PEG could therefore be the culprit of hypersensitivity reactions to
BNT162b2 vaccine, but it should be noted that other vaccines that
contain PEG cross-reactive excipients (e.g. polysorbate 80) induce
hypersensitivity reactions with significantly lower incidence than those
reported for mRNA COVID vaccines.
Apart from PEG, another component of the LNP,
1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC), should also be
considered a potential culprit as it contains a quaternary ammonium (QA)
ion (Figure 2) [7].
Steroidal ammonium neuromuscular blocking agents (S-NMBA), i.e.
rocuronium and similars, also contain this ion, and it is known that
IgE-mediate hypersensitivity reactions to QA (but also other possible
mechanisms, e.g. activation of Mas-related G-protein-coupled receptor
member X2 (MRGPRX2)) are implied in anaphylaxis that can occur even at
first exposure with these drugs, thus resembling the aforementioned
cases associated to Covid-19 vaccine [8].
The origin of such sensitization against QA was identified in previous
exposure to QA-containing compounds, such as cosmetics and
disinfectants, through damaged skin/mucosa [9]. Whether the BNT162b2
vaccine could exploit specific IgE to QA needs to be better evaluated.
No hypersensitivity reactions to the third component of the LNP,
ALC-0315, have been reported to date to the best of our knowledge.
Apart from lipids, even the mRNA has immunogenic properties since it is
capable of inducing an inflammatory response by itself. Toll Like
Receptors (TLRs) and other Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs), such as
RIG-I, can detect mRNA and activate the inflammation cascade
[6][10][11]; however, it is not known if this kind of
mechanisms triggered by mRNA can lead to mast cell degranulation
[12].
In conclusion, the culprit involved in the cases of immediate reactions
to mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine seems to be concentrated mainly in the LNP
constituting the envelope.
Further research on this topic is crucial, as a better knowledge of the
mechanism underlying adverse reaction to BNT162b2 could allow a better
risk stratification and patient selection, thus increasing safety for
people undergoing vaccination and, in turn, reducing vaccination
hesitancy.
References
[1] B. Cabanillas, C. Akdis, and N. Novak, “Allergic reactions to
the first COVID‐19 vaccine: a potential role of Polyethylene glycol?,”Allergy , p. all.14711, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1111/all.14711.
[2] E. Wenande and L. H. Garvey, “Immediate-type hypersensitivity
to polyethylene glycols: a review,” Clin. Exp. Allergy , vol. 46,
no. 7, pp. 907–922, 2016, doi: 10.1111/cea.12760.
[3] Q. Yang and S. K. Lai, “Anti-PEG immunity: Emergence,
characteristics, and unaddressed questions,” Wiley Interdiscip.
Rev. Nanomedicine Nanobiotechnology , vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 655–677, 2015,
doi: 10.1002/wnan.1339.
[4] N. B. Alsaleh and J. M. Brown, “Engineered Nanomaterials and
Type I Allergic Hypersensitivity Reactions,” Front. Immunol. ,
vol. 11, no. February, pp. 1–14, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00222.
[5] M. Johnson et al. , “Genomic and transcriptomic
comparison of allergen and silver nanoparticle-induced mast cell
degranulation reveals novel non-immunoglobulin E mediated mechanisms,”PLoS One , vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–23, 2018, doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0193499.
[6] B. Cabanillas, C. Akdis, and N. Novak, “COVID-19 vaccine
anaphylaxis: IgE, complement or what else? A reply to: COVID-19 to 2
vaccine anaphylaxis: PEG or not,” Allergy , vol. 76, 2021.
[7] National Center for Biotechnology Information, “PubChem
Compound Summary for CID 94190,
1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine.”
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/94190.
[8] D. Spoerl, H. Nigolian, C. Czarnetzki, and T. Harr,
“Reclassifying anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking agents based on
the presumed Patho-Mechanism: IgE-Mediated, pharmacological adverse
reaction or ‘innate hypersensitivity’?,” Int. J. Mol. Sci. , vol.
18, no. 6, pp. 1–14, 2017, doi: 10.3390/ijms18061223.
[9] S. Dong et al. , “Prevalence of IgE against neuromuscular
blocking agents in hairdressers and bakers,” Clin. Exp. Allergy ,
vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1256–1262, 2013, doi: 10.1111/cea.12189.
[10] A. M. Reichmuth and M. A. Oberli, “mRNA vaccine delivery using
lipid nanoparticles,” Ther. Deliv. , vol. 7, pp. 319–334, 2016,
[Online]. Available: www.future-science.com.
[11] N. Pardi, M. J. Hogan, F. W. Porter, and D. Weissman, “mRNA
vaccines-a new era in vaccinology,” Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. , vol.
17, no. 4, pp. 261–279, 2018, doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.243.
[12] J. Agier, J. Pastwińska, and E. Brzezińska-Błaszczyk, “An
overview of mast cell pattern recognition receptors,”Inflammation Research , vol. 67, no. 9. Birkhauser Verlag AG, pp.
737–746, Sep. 01, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00011-018-1164-5.
Figure Legends
Figure 1. BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine composition. Lipid
nanoparticle (LNP) components: ALC-0159
(2-[(polietilenglicole)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecilacetammide); ALC-0315
(((4-idrossibutil)azanediil)bis(esano-6,1-diil)bis(2-esildecanoate));
DSPC (1,2-distearoil-sn-glicero-3-fosfocoline); cholesterol.
This envelope encloses the mRNA and allows its entrance in antigen
presenting cells (APC), whose ribosomes translate the genetic sequence
so that then viral Spike proteins can be expressed on MHC class I and
class II of APCs, giving rise to the immune response [10].
Figure 2. DSPC (1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine)
chemical structure with its quaternary ammonium ion [7].
Author Contributions
All the Authors have contributed to conceptualization, writing, revision
of this letter. Anna Radice and Filippo Fassio created the figures.