Table 2 Comparison of neonatal birthweight, gender and malformations among the three groups
Item EMT≤7.5 mm EMT 7.6-12 mm EMT 12> mm P value
No. of cases 181 1714 952
Birthweight (g) 3000(2525,3350)* 3350(3050,3650) 3400(3100,3690) <0.001
Gender of newborn (%) 0.06
Male 55.2 (100/181) 52.2 (894/1714) 56.9 (542/952)
Female 44.8 (81/181) 47.8 (820/1714) 43.1 (410/952)
LBW (%) 24.9 (45/181)* 4.0 (69/1714) 5.3 (50/952) <0.001
Neonatal malformations (%) 1.1 (2/181) 0.8 (13/1714) 1.5 (14/952) 0.21
Note: Data are presented as median(P25,P75) for continuous variable and n (%) for categorical variable;* shows that there is a statistically significant difference between EMT≤7.5 mm and EMT 7.6-12 mm, EMT≤7.5 mm and EMT 12> mm Note: Data are presented as median(P25,P75) for continuous variable and n (%) for categorical variable;* shows that there is a statistically significant difference between EMT≤7.5 mm and EMT 7.6-12 mm, EMT≤7.5 mm and EMT 12> mm Note: Data are presented as median(P25,P75) for continuous variable and n (%) for categorical variable;* shows that there is a statistically significant difference between EMT≤7.5 mm and EMT 7.6-12 mm, EMT≤7.5 mm and EMT 12> mm Note: Data are presented as median(P25,P75) for continuous variable and n (%) for categorical variable;* shows that there is a statistically significant difference between EMT≤7.5 mm and EMT 7.6-12 mm, EMT≤7.5 mm and EMT 12> mm Note: Data are presented as median(P25,P75) for continuous variable and n (%) for categorical variable;* shows that there is a statistically significant difference between EMT≤7.5 mm and EMT 7.6-12 mm, EMT≤7.5 mm and EMT 12> mm