Dietrich Stovesandt

and 27 more

Background Rebound thymic hyperplasia (RTH) is a common phenomenon caused by stress factors such as chemo- (CTX) or radiotherapy with an incidence of up to 40%. Misinterpretation of RTH and thymic lymphoma relapse (LR) may lead to unnecessary diagnostic procedures including invasive biopsies or treatment intensification. The aim of this study was to identify parameters that differentiate between RTH and thymic LR in the anterior mediastinum. Methods After completion of CTX, we analyzed CTs and MRIs of 291 patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) and adequate imaging available from the European Network for Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma C1-trial. In all patients with biopsy proven LR an additional FDG-PET-CT was assessed. Structure and morphologic configuration in addition to calcifications and presence of multiple masses in the thymic region and signs of extrathymic LR were evaluated. Results After CTX, a significant volume increase of a new or growing mass in the thymic space occurred in 133 of 291 patients. Without biopsy only 100 patients could be identified as RTH or LR. No single finding related to thymic regrowth allowed differentiation between RTH and LR. However, the vast majority of cases with thymic LR presented with additional increasing tumor masses (34/35). All RTH patients (65/65) presented with isolated thymic growth. Conclusion Isolated thymic LR is very uncommon. CHL relapse should be suspected when increasing tumor masses are present in distant sites outside of the thymic area. Conversely, if regrowth of lymphoma in other sites can be excluded, an isolated thymic mass after CTX likely represents RTH.

Victor Pereira

and 12 more

To analyze the role of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in the biological and clinical characteristics of patients treated for classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) in France. Bio-pathological data of 301 patients treated for a cHL in or according to the protocol of the EuroNet PHL-C1 trial between November 2008 and February 2013 were centrally reviewed. Median age at diagnosis was 14 [3-18] years and the F/M ratio 0.86, 0.47 before 10 years and 0.9 from 11 to 18. CHL subtypes were nodular sclerosis for 266/301 (88%) patients, mixed cellularity for 22/301 (7%), lymphocyte rich for 2/301 (1%), and 11/301 were unclassified. EBV expression in situ (EBV cHL) was observed for 68/301 (23%) patients, significantly associated with MC subtype and male gender, and there was a trend with age <10 years, it was particularly overrepresented in boys below 10 years: 15/23 (65%) vs 28/139 among other male patients (20%). Event-free and overall survival were equivalent between EBV and non-EBV cHL patients. EBV viral load was tested for 108/301 patients and detectable in 22/108 (22%) cases. A positive viral load was overrepresented in EBV cHL versus non-EBV cHL patients: 13/28 (46%) vs 9/80 (11%). Detailed semi-quantitative histological analysis showed a high number of B-cell residual follicles in EBV cHL and no significant association with CD 20 or PAX 5 immunostaining in tumoral cells relative to EBV-negative HL. Distribution of EBV cHL in children and adolescents is associated with young age and male gender, suggesting a specific physiopathology and may require a differential therapeutic approach.