REFERENCES
1. Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, et al. Difficult Airway Society
2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in
adults. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2015;115(6):827-848.
2. Gómez-Ríos M, Gaitini L, Matter I, Somri M. Guidelines and algorithms
for managing the difficult airway. Revista Española de
Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Edition). 2018;65(1):41-48.
3. Nørskov A, Wetterslev J, Rosenstock C, et al. Prediction of difficult
mask ventilation using a systematic assessment of risk factors vs.
existing practice–a cluster randomised clinical trial in 94,006
patients. Anaesthesia. 2017;72(3):296-308.
4. Foley LJ, Urdaneta F, Berkow L, et al. Difficult Airway Management in
Adult COVID-19 Patients: Statement by the Society of Airway Management.Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2021:10.1213.
5. Higgs A, McGrath B, Goddard C, et al. Guidelines for the management
of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults. British journal
of anaesthesia. 2018;120(2):323-352.
6. Soleimanpour H, Gholipouri C, Panahi JR, et al. Role of
anesthesiology curriculum in improving bag-mask ventilation and
intubation success rates of emergency medicine residents: a prospective
descriptive study. BMC emergency medicine. 2011;11(1):1-6.
7. Hagberg C, Gabel JC, Connis R. Difficult Airway Society 2015
guidelines for the management of unanticipated difficult intubation in
adults: not just another algorithm. In: Oxford University Press; 2015.
8. Nielsen JR, Lim K-S. Increasing the Scope on Difficult Airways: What
About Mask Ventilation? Anesthesia & Analgesia.2019;129(3):e109.
9. Sreekantha D, Saldanha RS, Krishnappa JG, Mehandale SG, Glen RRC,
Prajna M. Predicting difficulties in Mask Ventilation using Machine
Learning techniques. Paper presented at: 2019 IEEE International
Conference on Distributed Computing, VLSI, Electrical Circuits and
Robotics (DISCOVER)2019.
10. Botes L, Jacobs J, Rademeyer R, Van der Merwe S, Van Heerden L,
Diedericks B. The effect of different anaesthetic mask shapes on the
anatomical dead space using infant, child and adult part-task trainers.Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia.2018;24(5):145-147.
11. Gerstein NS, Carey MC, Braude DA, et al. Efficacy of facemask
ventilation techniques in novice providers. Journal of clinical
anesthesia. 2013;25(3):193-197.
12. Riggle JD, McCrory B, Wadman M, et al. Comparison of muscle exertion
and fatigue between standard bag valve mask and NuMask. Paper presented
at: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual
Meeting2012.
13. McCrory B, Lowndes BR, Thompson DL, et al. Workload comparison of
intraoral mask to standard mask ventilation using a cadaver model. Paper
presented at: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Annual Meeting2012.
14. Nimmagadda U, Salem M, Hsu E, Knezevic NN. The New Mask Is as
Effective as the Classic Face Mask in Achieving Maximal Preoxygenation.
15. Amack AJ, Barber GA, Ng PC, Smith TB, April MD. Comparison of
ventilation with one-handed mask seal with an intraoral mask versus
conventional cuffed face mask in a cadaver model: a randomized crossover
trial. Annals of emergency medicine. 2017;69(1):12-17.
16. Bach JR, Saporito LR. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Interface
Adapted for Postextubation Continuous Noninvasive Ventilatory Support.American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.2015;94(9):e80-e83.
17. McCrory B, Lowndes BR, Thompson DL, et al. Crossover assessment of
intraoral and cuffed ventilation by emergency responders. Military
medicine. 2019;184(Supplement_1):310-317.
18. Blake DF, Crowe M, Lindsay D, Brouff A, Mitchell SJ, Pollock NW.
Comparison of tissue oxygenation achieved breathing oxygen from a demand
valve with four different mask configurations. Diving and
hyperbaric medicine. 2018;48(4):209.
19. Nagappa M, Wong J, Singh M, Wong DT, Chung F. An update on the
various practical applications of the STOP-Bang questionnaire in
anesthesia, surgery, and perioperative medicine. Current opinion
in anaesthesiology. 2017;30(1):118.
20. Han R, Tremper KK, Kheterpal S, O’Reilly M. Grading scale for mask
ventilation. The Journal of the American Society of
Anesthesiologists. 2004;101(1):267-267.
21. Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index):
Results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Advances in
psychology. Vol 52. Elsevier; 1988:139-183.
22. Coule P, Mazzoli A, Todaro J. 465: Comparison of a Novel Intra-Oral
Mask (NuMask®) to Standard Mask Ventilation Using a Cadaver Model.Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2010;3(56):S150-S151.
23. El-Orbany M, Woehlck HJ. Difficult mask ventilation.Anesthesia & analgesia. 2009;109(6):1870-1880.
Table 1: Demographic and anthropometric characteristics of the
patients