The bending trial presented here produced substantially larger individuals when compared with the original dataset used in Section xxx which had a mean diameter of 28 mm with a standard deviation of 5 mm. The growth-strain substantially increased from the original dataset mean of 848 with a standard deviation of 662, (however the dataset was left censored). The new dataset shows an increase in both mean and standard deviation across both diameter and growth strain, as can be seen in Table \ref{130815}. With comparison to the Woodville data presented in Chapter 4 the diameter (36.6 mm) sits between the two datasets and growth-strain in the original set is comparatively very low, and the new set is comparable, being 218 micro-strains higher in the control. It should be noted this new dataset had no zero values, and the two Woodville datasets (Chapter 4 and Appendix xxx) contained one zero value each, being less than 0.1% of the data, this is in contrast to the original left-censored dataset presented in Section xxx, where approximately 35% were zero value. The reasoning for this, now evidently uncharacteristic dataset is still unknown and one can only speculate as to the reasoning for the occurrence.