loading page

Expanding the conservation genomics toolbox: incorporating structural variants to enhance genomic studies for species of conservation concern
  • +6
  • Jana Wold,
  • Klaus-Peter Koepfli,
  • Stephanie Galla,
  • Carolyn J. Hogg,
  • David Eccles,
  • Marissa Le Lec,
  • Joseph Guhlin,
  • Anna Santure,
  • Tammy Steeves
Jana Wold
University of Canterbury

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Klaus-Peter Koepfli
Smithsonian Conservat Biol Inst
Author Profile
Stephanie Galla
University of Canterbury
Author Profile
Carolyn J. Hogg
The University of Sydney
Author Profile
David Eccles
Malaghan Institute of Medical Research
Author Profile
Marissa Le Lec
University of Otago
Author Profile
Joseph Guhlin
University of Otago
Author Profile
Anna Santure
The University of Auckland
Author Profile
Tammy Steeves
University of Canterbury
Author Profile


Structural variants (SVs) are large rearrangements (> 50 bp) within the genome that impact gene function and the content and structure of chromosomes. As a result, SVs are a significant source of functional genomic variation, i.e. variation at genomic regions underpinning phenotype differences, that can have large effects on individual and population fitness. While there are increasing opportunities to investigate functional genomic variation in threatened species via single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) datasets, SVs remain understudied despite their potential influence on fitness traits of conservation interest. In this future-focused Opinion, we contend that characterizing SVs offers the conservation genomics community an exciting opportunity to complement SNP-based approaches to enhance species recovery. We also leverage the existing literature–predominantly in human health, agriculture and eco-evolutionary biology–to identify approaches for readily characterizing SVs and consider how integrating these into the conservation genomics toolbox may transform the way we manage some of the world’s most threatened species.
31 May 2021Submitted to Molecular Ecology
02 Jun 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned
18 Jun 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
21 Jun 2021Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
28 Jul 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
28 Jul 20211st Revision Received
28 Jul 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned
18 Aug 2021Editorial Decision: Accept
Dec 2021Published in Molecular Ecology volume 30 issue 23 on pages 5949-5965. 10.1111/mec.16141