References
Aizen, M. A. et al. 1990. Among‐and within‐flower comparisons of pollen tube growth following self‐and cross‐pollinations in Dianthus chinensis (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany . 77 : 671-676.
Albor, C. et al. 2019. Taxonomic and functional diversity of the co‐flowering community differentially affect Cakile edentulapollination at different spatial scales. Journal of Ecology107 : 2167-2181.
Andonian, K. et al. 2012. Geographic mosaics of plant–soil microbe interactions in a global plant invasion. Journal of Biogeography39 : 600-608.
Arceo‐Gómez, G. and Ashman, T.L. 2011. Heterospecific pollen deposition: does diversity alter the consequences? New Phytologist192 : 738-746.
Arceo-Gómez, G. and Ashman, T.L. 2014a. Coflowering community context influences female fitness and alters the adaptive value of flower longevity in Mimulus guttatusThe American Naturalist183 : E50-E63.
Arceo-Gómez, G. and Ashman, T.L. 2014b. Heterospecific pollen receipt affects self pollen more than outcross pollen: implications for mixed‐mating plants. Ecology95 : 2946-2952.
Arceo‐Gómez, G. et al. 2016a. Can plants evolve tolerance mechanisms to heterospecific pollen effects? An experimental test of the adaptive potential in Clarkia species. Oikos125 : 718-725.
Arceo‐Gómez, G. et al. 2016b. Patterns of among‐and within‐species variation in heterospecific pollen receipt: The importance of ecological generalization. American Journal of Botany103 : 396-407.
Arceo‐Gómez, G. et al. 2016c. Patterns and sources of variation in pollen deposition and pollen tube formation in flowers of the endemic monoecious shrub Cnidoscolus souzae (Euphorbiaceae). Plant Biology18 : 594-600.
Arceo‐Gómez, G. et al. 2018. Variation in sampling effort affects the observed richness of plant–plant interactions via heterospecific pollen transfer: implications for interpretation of pollen transfer networks. American journal of botany  105 : 1601-1608.
Arceo-Gómez, G. et al. 2019a. Global geographic patterns of heterospecific pollen receipt help uncover potential ecological and evolutionary impacts across plant communities worldwide. Scientific reports9 : 1-9.
Arceo-Gómez, G., et al. 2019b. Interactive effects between donor and recipient species mediate fitness costs of heterospecific pollen receipt in a co-flowering community. Oecologia189 : 1041-1047.
Armbruster, W.S. et al. 2014. Do specialized flowers promote reproductive isolation? Realized pollination accuracy of three sympatricPedicularis species. Annals of Botany113 : 331-340.
Ashman, T‐L. and Arceo‐Gómez, G. 2013. Toward a predictive understanding of the fitness costs of heterospecific pollen receipt and its importance in co‐flowering communities. American Journal of Botany  100: 1061-1070.
Ashman, T-L., Arceo-Gómez, G., Bennett, J.M. and Knight, T.M., 2020. Is heterospecific pollen receipt the missing link in understanding pollen limitation of plant reproduction? American Journal of Botany , 107: 845-847.
Ashman, T.L. et al. 2020. Pollen on stigmas as proxies of pollinator competition and facilitation: complexities, caveats and future directions. Annals of Botany125 : 1003-1012.
Barrett, S.C. and Helenurm, K. 1987. The reproductive biology of boreal forest herbs. I. Breeding systems and pollination. Canadian Journal of Botany65 : 2036-2046.
Barrett, S.C. and Husband, B.C. 1990. Variation in outcrossing rates inEichhornia paniculata : the role of demographic and reproductive factors. Plant Species Biology5 : 41-55.
Bascompte, J. et al. 2003. The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 100: 9383-9387.
Bawa, K.S. 1990. Plant-pollinator interactions in tropical rain forests. Annual review of Ecology and Systematics , 21: 399-422.
Bedinger, P.A. et al. 2011. Interspecific reproductive barriers in the tomato clade: opportunities to decipher mechanisms of reproductive isolation. Sexual Plant Reproduction24 : 171-187.
Borgella Jr, R. et al. 2001. Species Richness and Pollen Loads of Hummingbirds Using Forest Fragments in Southern Costa Rica.Biotropica33 : 90-109.
Briggs, H.M. et. al. 2016. Heterospecific pollen deposition inDelphinium barbeyi : linking stigmatic pollen loads to reproductive output in the field. Annals of Botany117 : 341-347.
Brosi, B.J. et al. 2017. Experimental species removals impact the architecture of pollination networks. Biology letters, 13: 20170243.
Bruckman, D. and Campbell, D.R. 2016. Pollination of a native plant changes with distance and density of invasive plants in a simulated biological invasion. American journal of botany103 : 1458-1465.
Busch, J.W. and Schoen, D.J. 2008. The evolution of self-incompatibility when mates are limiting. Trends in plant science13 : 128-136.
Campbell, A.W. et al. 2001. The importance of light intensity for pollen tube growth and embryo survival in wheat× maize crosses. Annals of Botany87 : 517-522.
Carstensen, D.W. et al. 2014. Beta diversity of plant-pollinator networks and the spatial turnover of pairwise interactions. PLoS One9 : 112903.
Celaya, I.N. et al. 2015. Negative effects of heterospecific pollen receipt vary with abiotic conditions: ecological and evolutionary implications. Annals of botany116 : 789-795.
Chapin, F.S. et al. 1987. Plant responses to multiple environmental factors. Bioscience37 : 49-57.
Cosacov, A. et al. 2008. Variation of pollinator assemblages and pollen limitation in a locally specialized system: the oil-producingNierembergia linariifolia (Solanaceae). Annals of botany102 : 723-734.
Cruzan, M.B. and Barrett, S.C. 1993. Contribution of cryptic incompatibility to the mating system of Eichhornia paniculata(pontederiaceae). Evolution47 : 925-934.
Daniels, J.D. and Arceo-Gómez, G. 2020. Effects of invasiveCirsium arvense on pollination in a southern Appalachian floral community vary with spatial scale and floral symmetry. Biological Invasions22 : 783-797.
Davis, M.A. et al. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of ecology88 : 528-534.
de Waal, C. et al. 2015. Relative density and dispersion pattern of two southern African Asteraceae affect fecundity through heterospecific interference and mate availability, not pollinator visitation rate. Journal of Ecology103 : 513-525.
Eaton, D.A. et al. 2012. Floral diversity and community structure inPedicularis (Orobanchaceae). Ecology93 : S182-S194.
Emer, C. et al. 2015. The impact of the invasive alien plant,Impatiens glandulifera , on pollen transfer networks. PloS one10 : 0143532.
Encinas‐Viso, F. et al. 2020. The loss of self‐incompatibility in a range expansion. Journal of Evolutionary Biology . https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13665
Fang, Q. and Huang, S.Q. 2013. A directed network analysis of heterospecific pollen transfer in a biodiverse community. Ecology94 : 1176-1185.
Fang, Q. et al. 2019. Multi‐year stigmatic pollen‐load sampling reveals temporal stability in interspecific pollination of flowers in a subalpine meadow. Oikos128 : 1739-1747.
Feng, H. et al. 2000. Effect of enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation on pollen germination and tube growth of 19 taxa in vitro. Environmental and Experimental Botany43 : 45-53.
Fishman, L. and Wyatt, R. 1999. Pollinator‐mediated competition, reproductive character displacement, and the evolution of selfing inArenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution53 : 1723-1733.
Gandon, S. and Nuismer, S.L. 2009. Interactions between genetic drift, gene flow, and selection mosaics drive parasite local adaptation. The American Naturalist173 : 212-224.
Gomulkiewicz, R. et al. 2000. Hot spots, cold spots, and the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution. The American Naturalist156 : 156-174.
Hanoteaux, S. et al. 2013. Effects of spatial patterns on the pollination success of a less attractive species. Oikos122 : 867-880.
Hargreaves, A.L. and Eckert, C.G. 2014. Evolution of dispersal and mating systems along geographic gradients: implications for shifting ranges. Functional ecology28 : 5-21.
Hegland, S.J. and Boeke, L. 2006. Relationships between the density and diversity of floral resources and flower visitor activity in a temperate grassland community. Ecological Entomology31 : 532-538.
Herrera, C.M. 1988. Variation in mutualisms: the spatiotemporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblage. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society35 : 95-125.
Herrera, C.M. 1995. Microclimate and individual variation in pollinators: flowering plants are more than their flowers. Ecology76 : 1516-1524.
Herrera, C.M. 2002. Censusing natural microgametophyte populations: variable spatial mosaics and extreme fine‐graininess in winter‐floweringHelleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae). American Journal of Botany89 : 1570-1578.
Hiscock, S.J. and Dickinson, H.G. 1993. Unilateral incompatibility within the Brassicaceae: further evidence for the involvement of the self-incompatibility (S)-locus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics86 : 744-753.
Hopkins, R. and Rausher, M.D. 2012. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower color allele drives reinforcement. Science335 : 1090-1092.
Hughes, A.R. et al. 2008. Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecology letters11 : 609-623.
Ivey, C.T. and Carr, D.E. 2005. Effects of herbivory and inbreeding on the pollinators and mating system of Mimulus guttatus(Phrymaceae). American Journal of Botany92 : 1641-1649.
Iwao, K. and Rausher, M.D. 1997. Evolution of plant resistance to multiple herbivores: quantifying diffuse coevolution. The American Naturalist149 : 316-335.
Johnson, A.L. and Ashman, T.L. 2019. Consequences of invasion for pollen transfer and pollination revealed in a tropical island ecosystem. New Phytologist221 : 142-154.
Johnson, M.T. and Stinchcombe, J.R. 2007. An emerging synthesis between community ecology and evolutionary biology. Trends in ecology & evolution22 : 250-257.
Kaiser-Bunbury, C.N. et al. 2017. Ecosystem restoration strengthens pollination network resilience and function. Nature542 : 223-227.
Kanchan, S. and Chandra, J. 1980. Pollen allelopathy—a new phenomenon. New Phytologist84 : 739-746.
Kay, K.M. and Schemske, D.W. 2008. Natural selection reinforces speciation in a radiation of neotropical rainforest plants. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution62 : 2628-2642.
Kay, K.M. et al. 2019. Experimental sympatry reveals geographic variation in floral isolation by hawkmoths. Annals of botany123 : 405-413.
King, C. et al. 2013. Why flower visitation is a poor proxy for pollination: measuring single‐visit pollen deposition, with implications for pollination networks and conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution4 : 811-818.
Kruszewski, L.J. and Galloway, L.F. 2006. Explaining outcrossing rate inCampanulastrum americanum (Campanulaceae): geitonogamy and cryptic self-incompatibility. International Journal of Plant Sciences167 : 455-461.
Kunin, W.E. 1997. Population size and density effects in pollination: pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaberJournal of Ecology , 85: 225-234.
Lankinen, Å. 2001. In vitro pollen competitive ability in Viola tricolor: temperature and pollen donor effects. Oecologia128 : 492-498.
Lush, et al. 1998. Directional guidance of Nicotiana alata pollen tubes in vitro and on the stigma. Plant Physiology118 : 733-741.
McLernon, S.M. et al. 1996. Heterospecific pollen transfer between sympatric species in a midsuccessional old‐field community. American Journal of Botany83 : 1168-1174.
Mazer, S.J. et al. 2010. The joint evolution of mating system and pollen performance: predictions regarding male gametophytic evolution in selfers vs. outcrossers. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics12 : 31-41.
Minnaar, C. et al. 2019a. Intraspecific divergence in floral‐tube length promotes asymmetric pollen movement and reproductive isolation. New Phytologist224 : 1160-1170.
Minnaar, C. et al. 2019b. Plant–pollinator interactions along the pathway to paternity. Annals of Botany123 : 225-245.
Mitchell, R. J. et al. 2009. New frontiers in competition for pollination. Annals of botany, 103: 1403-1413.
Montgomery, B.R. and Rathcke, B.J. 2012. Effects of floral restrictiveness and stigma size on heterospecific pollen receipt in a prairie community. Oecologia168 : 449-458.
Morales, C.L. and Traveset, A. 2008. Interspecific pollen transfer: magnitude, prevalence and consequences for plant fitness. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences27 : 221-238.
Moreira-Hernández, J.I. and Muchhala, N. 2019. Importance of pollinator-mediated interspecific pollen transfer for angiosperm evolution. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics50 : 191-217.
Muchhala, N. et al. 2010. Competition drives specialization in pollination systems through costs to male fitness. The American Naturalist176 : 732-743.
Muchhala, N. and Jarrin‐V, P. 2002. Flower Visitation by Bats in Cloud Forests of Western Ecuador1. Biotropica34 : 387-395.
Muchhala, N. and Potts, M.D. 2007. Character displacement among bat-pollinated flowers of the genus Burmeistera : analysis of mechanism, process and pattern. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences274 : 2731-2737.
Muchhala, N. and Thomson, J.D. 2012. Interspecific competition in pollination systems: costs to male fitness via pollen misplacement. Functional Ecology26 : 476-482.
Murfett, J. et al. 1996. S RNase and interspecific pollen rejection in the genus Nicotiana: multiple pollen-rejection pathways contribute to unilateral incompatibility between self-incompatible and self-compatible species. The Plant Cell8 : 943-958.
Nasrallah, M.E. et al. 2004. Natural variation in expression of self-incompatibility in Arabidopsis thaliana: implications for the evolution of selfing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences101 : 16070-16074.
Ness, R.W. et al. 2010. Mating-system variation, demographic history and patterns of nucleotide diversity in the tristylous plantEichhornia paniculataGenetics184 : 381-392.
Olesen, J.M. and Jordano, P. 2002. Geographic patterns in plant–pollinator mutualistic networks. Ecology83 : 2416-2424.
Parra‐Tabla, V. et al. 2020. Pollen transfer networks reveal alien species as main heterospecific pollen donors with fitness consequences for natives. Journal of Ecology . 10.1111/1365-2745.13520.
Phillips, R.D. et al. 2020. Niche Perspectives on Plant–Pollinator Interactions. Trends in Plant Science 25: 779-793.
Randle, A.M. et al. 2018. Shifts to earlier selfing in sympatry may reduce costs of pollinator sharing. Evolution72 : 1587-1599.
Rathcke, B. 1983. Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. In Real L. Pollination biology , Academic Press, pp305 -329.
Reinartz, J.A. and Les, D.H. 1994. Bottleneck‐induced dissolution of self‐incompatibility and breeding system consequences in Aster furcatus (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany81 : 446-455.
Robertson, C. 1895. The philosophy of flower seasons, and the phaenological relations of the entomophilous flora and the anthophilous insect fauna. The American Naturalist, 29: 97-117.
Ruane, L.G. and Donohue, K. 2007. Environmental effects on pollen–pistil compatibility between Phlox cuspidata and P. drummondii (Polemoniaceae): implications for hybridization dynamics. American journal of botany, 94: 219-227.
Sargent, R.D. and Ackerly, D.D. 2008. Plant–pollinator interactions and the assembly of plant communities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23: 123-130.
Searcy, K.B. and Macnair, M.R. 1990. Differential seed production inMimulus guttatus in response to increasing concentrations of copper in the pistil by pollen from copper tolerant and sensitive sources. Evolution, 44: 1424-1435.
Singer, M.C. and McBride, C.S. 2012. Geographic mosaics of species’ association: a definition and an example driven by plant–insect phenological synchrony. Ecology93 : 2658-2673.
Spigler, R.B. and Chang, S.M. 2008. Effects of plant abundance on reproductive success in the biennial Sabatia angularis(Gentianaceae): spatial scale matters. Journal of Ecology96 : 323-333.
Stinchcombe, J.R. and Rausher, M.D. 2001. Diffuse selection on resistance to deer herbivory in the ivyleaf morning glory, Ipomoea hederacea. The American Naturalist158 : 376-388.
Tamaki, I. et al. 2009. Interpopulation variation in mating system and late‐stage inbreeding depression in Magnolia stellataMolecular Ecology18 : 2365-2374.
Thompson, J.N. 1999. Specific hypotheses on the geographic mosaic of coevolution. The American Naturalist153 : S1-S14.
Thompson, J.N. and Cunningham, B.M. 2002. Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection. Nature417 : 735-738.
Thomson, J.D. et al. 1982a. The effect of a foreign pollen on ovule development in Diervilla lonicera (Caprifoliaceae). New Phytologist , 90: 777-783.
Thomson, J.D. et al. 1982b. Behavior of bumble bee pollinators ofAralia hispida Vent. (Araliaceae). Oecologia54 : 326-336.
Thomson, J.D. et al. 2019. Effects of spatial patterning of co-flowering plant species on pollination quantity and purity. Annals of Botany123 : 303-310.
Toju, H. and Sota, T. 2006. Imbalance of predator and prey armament: geographic clines in phenotypic interface and natural selection. The American Naturalist167 : 105-117.
Tong, Z.Y. and Huang, S.Q. 2016. Pre‐and post‐pollination interaction between six co‐flowering Pedicularis species via heterospecific pollen transfer. New Phytologist211 : 1452-1461.
Toräng, P. et al. 2010. Habitat quality and among-population differentiation in reproductive effort and flowering phenology in the perennial herb Primula farinosa . Evolutionary Ecology , 24: 715-729.
Tur, C. et al. 2016. Evaluating the effects of pollinator‐mediated interactions using pollen transfer networks: evidence of widespread facilitation in south Andean plant communities. Ecology Letters19 : 576-586.
Vellend, M. and Geber, M.A. 2005. Connections between species diversity and genetic diversity. Ecology Letters8 : 767-781.
Waelti, et al. 2008. Floral odour and reproductive isolation in two species of Silene . Journal of evolutionary biology , 21: 111-121.
Waites, A.R. and Ågren, J.O.N. 2004. Pollinator visitation, stigmatic pollen loads and among‐population variation in seed set in Lythrum salicariaJournal of Ecology92 : 512-526.
Waser, N.M. 1978. Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology59 : 934-944.
Waser, N.M. et al. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology77 : 1043-1060.
Weller, S.G. and Ornduff, R. 1977. Cryptic self-incompatibility inAmsinckia grandiflora . Evolution , 31: 47-51.
Whitehead, M.R. et al. 2018. Plant mating systems often vary widely among populations. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution , 6: 38.