Key Clinical Message: Management of injuries caused by
penetrating skull base foreign body are complex and require a
multidisciplinary care. Nasal endoscopic approach preserves the
functionality of the structures in a less invasive technique.
Introduction
Penetrating orbitocranial trauma caused by foreign bodies is related to
high impact trauma and imposes severe risks of critical structure
damages, as meningitis, vision loss, fistula and death1. Besides, it is often associated with other facial
injuries and therefore, demand multidisciplinary care2. A prompt intervention is recommended in cases
associated with organic foreign body, such as wood, due to the risk of
infection 3.
Preserving the functionality of the structures, in addition to restoring
aesthetic characteristics, are the main objectives of surgical
treatment. In this scenario, new surgical techniques have been
described, highlighting the use of endoscope and a transnasal approach4. Due to the rarity of skull base foreign bodies, it
is interesting to report the cases, as may contribute to the decision of
the surgical repair and further create a treatment algorithm. Here we
present an unusual case of large skull base wooden penetrating foreign
body submitted to endoscopic sinus surgery in an emergency setting.
Case Report
A 29-year-old man admitted to the emergency room with a history of being
beaten with a tree branch that transfixed his head through the
inferolateral region of the left orbit (Figure 1). He had been
previously intubated and sedated at a primary hospital due to decreased
consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale: 7/15). His medical historical was
unknown, except for drugs abuse.
After initial management provided by trauma surgeons, the patient was
submitted to full body computed tomography (CT). CT scans showed a
foreign body with approximately fifteen centimeters penetrating skull
base through his left orbit region, with inferior and posterior way to
the right temporal muscle. Several comminuted fractures were seen as:
medial and inferior walls of left orbit, left lamina papyracea, nasal
septum, medial and lateral walls of right maxillary sinus (Figure 2).
Nasal bone was bilaterally fractured. Furthermore, foci of subarachnoid
hemorrhage were also detected (Marshall 2).
Multidisciplinary evaluation was conducted by neurosurgery and
ophthalmology. As the ocular globe seemed preserved and no significant
brain injury was detected, a conservative approach was adopted by those
specialties. Patient was then transferred to operation room by the
otolaryngology team. First, hemorrhage from the right maxillary artery
was controlled under endoscopic visualization. After, we performed a
careful manual removal of the foreign body (Figure 3). After extenuating
nasal irrigation and removal of wood pieces, nosebleeds were controlled
with adrenaline solution. As the orbital fat was prolapsing into the
nasal cavity, grafting of the medial orbital wall was performed with a
septal cartilage flap (Figure 4). The patient remained in intensive care
and empirical antibiotic therapy was started with third generation
cephalosporin and clindamycin. Tetanus vaccine was also administered. In
the postoperative ophthalmological evaluation, the left eye was
de-epithelialized, but due to agitation, he remained sedated, with
extubation failures and, therefore, a complete evaluation was not
possible.
Ten days after procedure, patient still presented fever despite
broad-spectrum antibiotic and negative cultures, therefore, a second
emergency endoscopic nasal surgery was performed to drainage hemossinus.
On fifth postoperative-day, he developed acute kidney injury,
hypernatremia, and died after an irreversible cardiorespiratory arrest.
Discussion
Considering the severity of the trauma, the initial management should
follow advanced trauma life support systematization. A multidisciplinary
assessment should be followed, including neurosurgery and ophthalmology,
and foreign body removal is postpone until clinical stabilization is
guaranteed 5.
It is imperative to perform an image exam to assess the extent of the
damage, so a computed tomography scan (CT) is essential. In the scenario
of traumatic brain injury, CT allows a fast assessment, with good
tomographic-clinical correlation 6. In addition, it is
the best modality to evaluate bone deformities and has good sensitivity
to foreign bodies, except for the detection of wood particles7. According to a review of twenty-four case reports,
wooden foreign bodies can be me missed in almost one third of initial
exams as it can be confused as free air 8. In our
case, despite the organic composition of the object, CT contributed to
therapeutic planning, as it surprisingly did not show any significant
intracranial damage or to the ocular globe, therefore, it was decided to
remove the foreign body.
Surgical approach depends on the degree of involvement and nature of
foreign body. Regarding the material, orbital organic foreign bodies
should be removed within twelve hours due to the risk of infection9. In cases where there is no impairment of the orbit
or vascular structures, the foreign body can be removed with immediate
orbital repair 2,3. The literature presents two main
foreign body removal techniques: external access or by transnasal
endoscopy 10. External access has the advantage of
better control of hemorrhages and direct visualization of the foreign
body and surrounding injured tissues 10. The
endoscopic access of the skull base was highlighted for being a less
invasive treatment, with less morbidity and greater aesthetic gain, in
addition to allowing the repair of fistulas at the same surgical time11. However, there is a lack of prospective studies
that compare the superiority of the different accesses mainly because of
the rarity of foreign body cases in skull base. Therefore, the choice
will depend on the extent of the damage and the surgeon’s experience12.
Regarding postoperative care, immunization against tetanus is mandatory
according to the vaccination situation 13. In
addition, despite the lack of evidence, several case reports support the
use of prophylactic antibiotic therapy to prevent complications such as
abscesses and meningitis 14. The scheme used in the
literature varies, and there is no consensus about the type, timing or
duration 15.
In our patient, it was possible to remove the foreign body manually. We
used the endoscopic technique to control nasal bleeding, remove retained
fragments and to reconstruct the papyraceous lamina, which was possible
without a metal plate. The correction of other fractures was postponed
until the edema and clinical conditions improve.
Conclusion
Foreign bodies in the skull base are rare and can cause severe damage
and complications, such as meningitis, vision loss, fistula and death.
Initial management should follow the principles of advanced trauma life
support. After stabilization, it is necessary to assess the integrity of
the structures, so multidisciplinary care and a computed tomography are
essential. We recommend the removal of the foreign body in an operating
room environment and the simultaneous use of sinus endoscope to ensure
bleeding control and repair lesions under direct visualization with a
less invasive approach.
Acknowlodgments: None.
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Author Contributions: AA and EC participated in the
surgical management of this case and were involved in the study‘s design
and writing. LS contributed in radiological assessment and data
analysis. CC contributed with literature review and manuscript edition.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.