References
1 . M. Pagliaro, Purposeful evaluation of scholarship in the
open science era, Challenges 2021 , 12 , 6.
https://doi.org/10.3390/challe12010006
4. Search with the query “personal academic website” carried
out at https://scholar.google.com
May 1, 2023.
5. Search with the query “personal academic website” carried
out at https://app.dimensions.ai May 1, 2023.
6. F. Barjak, X. Li, M. Thelwall, Which factors explain the web
impact of scientists’ personal homepages?
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci.
Technol. 2007 ,
58 , 200-211.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20476 7. A. Más-Bleda, I. F. Aguillo, Can a personal website be
useful as an information source to assess individual scientists? The
case of European highly cited researchers,
Scientometrics2013 ,
96 , 51-67.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0952-5 14. B. M. Leiner, V. G. Cerf, D. D. Clark, R. E. Kahn, L.
Kleinrock, D. C. Lynch, J. Postel, L. G. Roberts, S. Wolff, A brief
history of the Internet,
arXiv 1999 ,
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cs/9901011 17. S. Harnad, Publicly Retrievable FTP Archives for Esoteric
Science and Scholarship: a Subversive Proposal, The Network
Services Conference (NSC) , London: 1994 ; pp.28-30.
https://groups.google.com/g/bit.listserv.vpiej-l/c/BoKENhK0_00
(accessed May 1, 2023).
18. B. C. Björk, M. Laakso, P. Welling, P. Paetau, Anatomy of
green open access, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2014 ,65 , 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22963
19. K. Kurata, K. Yokoi, T. Morioka, Y. Minami, M. Kawai,
Monitoring the transition to open access through its mode of
implementation: A principal component analysis of two surveys,
Plos ONE 2022 , 17, e0271215.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271215 20. B. M. Hemminger, D. Lu, K.T. L. Vaughan, S. J. Adams,
Information seeking behavior of academic scientists,
J. Assoc.
Inf. Sci. Technol. 2007 ,
58 , 2205-2225.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20686 21. M.-T. Nagel, S. Schäfer, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, C.
Schemer, M. Maurer, D. Molerov, S. Schmidt, S. Brückner, How do
university students’ web search behavior, website characteristics, and
the interaction of both influence students’ critical online reasoning?.
Front. Educ. 2020 ,
5 , 565062.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.565062 24. D. Franzen, Obtaining self-archiving permissions at scale
to realize the potential of green Open Access,
PUBMET2022: The 9th
Conference on Scholarly Communication in the Context of Open Science ,
2022 .
https://doi.org/10.15291/pubmet.3922 36. E. L. Boyer, Scholarship Reconsidered , Carnegie
Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton (NJ):1990 ; pp.22-23.
37 B. Ćulum, Academics and Service to the Community: An
International (European) Perspective, in:
The Relevance of
Academic Work in Comparative Perspective , W. Cummings, U. Teichler
(Ed.s), Springer, Cham:
2015 ; pp. 139-162.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11767-6_9 38. L. Fedeli, Scholarship of engagement: teaching and research
as community-based service, in
Education Sciences & Society ,
Franco Angeli, Milan (Italy):
2022 ; pp.298-310.
https://doi.org/10.3280/ess1-2022oa13524 48. J. Nielsen, H. Loranger, Prioritizing Web Usability ,
New Riders, Berkeley (CA): 2006 .
49. R. Snieder, K. Larner, The Art of Being a Scientist ,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2009; p.3.
50. As put it by Drucker: “to be effective, every knowledge
worker… needs to be able to dispose of time in fairly large
chunks. To have small dribs and drabs of time at his disposal will not
be sufficient even if the total is an impressive number of hours”. See:
P. F. Drucker, The Effective Executive , Harper and Row, New York: 1966 ; p.29.