Arnaud Maugendre

and 5 more

Context: Inadequate feeding is a frequent reason for hospital referring in children with bronchiolitis and leads to prolonged hospitalization in 26% of the cases. The main objective was to identify the factors associated with the time to recover adequate nutrition in infants hospitalized for bronchiolitis. Method: We conducted a single-center retrospective study including infants less than 12 months hospitalized for bronchiolitis at Le Havre Hospital (France) between September 2018 and February 2021. A multivariate logistic regression model was computed to investigate the factors associated with (1) the time to recover adequate feeding (LOFR), and (2) the hospital length of stay (LOS). Results: 268 infants were included to assess the LOFR and 478 infants to assess the LOS. The median age was 3.2 months (1.6-5.4) and the sex ratio M/F was 11/20. The use of accessory muscles, nutritional support, and RR ≥ 70/min or < 30/min or apnea are associated (OR=1.5), from virtually no association (OR=1.0) to a significant positive association (OR=2.6) with the LOFR. Intense use of accessory muscles (OR=3.9; 95%CI 1.6-10.4) and “severe” clinical condition (OR=2.8; 95%CI 1.7-4. 8) at admission, O2 supplementation (OR=2.0; 95%CI 1.3-3.1) were significantly related to prolonged LOS in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: The clinical severity on admission may be related to the LOFR, ranging from none to significant. Other known factors and the new clinical severity scale proposed by the latest French guidelines appeared to be related to the LOS in this work. Further studies are needed to highlight these factors.

Nikolaos Papadopoulos

and 41 more

Background: The interplay between COVID-19 pandemic and asthma in children is still unclear. We evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on childhood asthma outcomes. Methods: The PeARL multinational cohort included 1,054 children with asthma and 505 non-asthmatic children aged between 4-18 years from 25 pediatric departments, from 15 countries globally. We compared the frequency of acute respiratory and febrile presentations during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic between groups and with data available from the previous year. In children with asthma, we also compared current and historical disease control. Results: During the pandemic, children with asthma experienced fewer upper respiratory tract infections, episodes of pyrexia, emergency visits, hospital admissions, asthma attacks and hospitalizations due to asthma, in comparison to the preceding year. Sixty-six percent of asthmatic children had improved asthma control while in 33% the improvement exceeded the minimal clinically important difference. Pre-bronchodilatation FEV1 and peak expiratory flow rate were improved during the pandemic. When compared to non-asthmatic controls, children with asthma were not at increased risk of LRTIs, episodes of pyrexia, emergency visits or hospitalizations during the pandemic. However, an increased risk of URTIs emerged. Conclusion: Childhood asthma outcomes, including control, were improved during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, probably because of reduced exposure to asthma triggers and increased treatment adherence. The decreased frequency of acute episodes does not support the notion that childhood asthma may be a risk factor for COVID-19. Furthermore, the potential for improving childhood asthma outcomes through environmental control becomes apparent.