References:
- Francisco Raga,M.D.,Fernando Bonilla-Musoles, M.D.,Javier
Blanes,M.D.,et al. Congenital Mullerian anomalies:diagnostic accuracy
of three-dimensional ultrasound. FERTIL STERIAL 1996,65(3):523-528.
- Meng-Hsing Wu, MD, Chao-Chin Hsu,MD, PhD, Ko-En Huang,MD.Detection of
Congenital Mullerian Duct Anomalies Using Three-Dimensional
Ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound, 1997,25(9):487-492.
- Min Jeong Kim, Youngjin Lee, Chulmin Lee, et al. Accuracy of three
dimensional ultrasound and treatment outcomes of intrauterine adhesion
in infertile women.Taiwan J Obstet Gyne,2015, 54 :737-741.
- Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M,et al. Intrauterine adhesion: detection
with transvaginal US. Radiology 1996;199:757–9.
- Anna Kougioumtsidou, Themistoklis Mikos, Grigoris F. Grimbizis, et al.
Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis and the classification
of congenital uterine anomalies using the ESHRE/ESGE classification: a
diagnostic accuracy study. Arch Gynecol Obstet,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05050-x
- N. Makris, K.Kalmantis, N. Skartados,et al. Three-dimensional
hysterosonography versus hysteroscopy for the detection of
intracavitary uterine abnormalities. Int J Gynec Obstet, 2007,97:6-9.
- Piotr Szkodziak, Slawomir Wozniak, Piotr Czuczwar, et al. Usefulness
of three dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography and
hysterosalpingography in diagnosing uterine anomalies. Ginekol Pol,
2014,85:354-359.
- Groszmann Y, Benacerraf B. Complete eGYNECOLOGY AND
OBSTETRICSGYNECOLOGY valuation of anatomy and morphology of the
infertile patient in a single visit; the modern infertility pelvic
ultrasound examination. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1381–1393.
- Detti L. Ultrasound assessment of uterine cavity remodeling after
surgical correction of subseptations. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2014;210:262.e1–262.e6.
- Detti L, Norwick H, Levi D’Ancona R, et al. Relevance of uterine
subseptations: what length
should warrant hysteroscopic resection? J Ultrasound Med. 2016. In
press.
- C. Bermejo, MD, PhD, P. Martı´nez-Ten, MD, PhD, L. Ruı´z-Lo´pez, BA,
M. Este´vez, MD and M. M. Gil, MD, PhD.Classification of Uterine
Anomalies by 3-Dimensional Ultrasonography Using ESHRE/ESGE Criteria:
Interobserver Variability. Reprod Sci,
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1933719117725825
journals.sagepub.com/home/rsx
- Zafarani F, Ahmadi F. Evaluation of intrauterine structural pathology
by three-dimensional sonohysterography using an extended imaging
method. Int J Fertil Steril 2013; 7: 1-6.
- Knopman J, Copperman AB. Value of 3D ultrasound in the management of
suspected Asherman’s syndrome. J Reprod Med 2007; 52: 1016-1022
[PMID: 18161399]
- FANG Ting-feng,SU Zheng,XIANG Ting-ting,DING Miao,DING Hong, WANG
Liang-an, XIE Mei-qing, WANG Wen-jun. A New Method for Assessing the
Intrauterine Adhesion by three-dimensional Endometrial Area
Imaging.Journal of Sun Yat-Sen Univercity(Medical Sciences),
2019,40(4):615-621.
- Detti L. Ultrasound assessment of uterine cavity remodeling after
surgical correction of subseptations. Am J Obstet Gynecol
2014;210:262.e1-6.
- A. Ludwin , M. A. Coelho Neto, I. Ludwin, C.O. Nastri , W. Costa, M.
Acién , J.L. Alcazar, B. Benacerraf, G. Condous, A. DeCherney, R-L. De
Wilde, M.P. Diamond, M.H. Emanuel, S. Guerriero, W. Hurd, D. Levine,
S. Lindheim, A. Pellicer, F. Petraglia, E. Saridogan, W.P. Martins.
Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): T-shaped uterus.
Doi:10.1002/uog.20845.
- Janina Kaislasuo, Oskari Heikinheimo,, Pekka La hteenma ki ,and Satu
Suhonen.Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity
measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using
intrauterine contraception.Hum Reprod, 2015,30(7):1580–1588.
- Kurz KH. Cavimeter uterine measurements and IUD clinical correlation.
In: Zatuchni GI, Goldsmith A, Sciarra JJ, editors. Intrauterine
Contraception: Advances and Future Prospects. Philadelphia: Harper and
Row; 1984:142–162.
- Wang Jao-quang, Wang Quang-fwi, Chang Fo-yuan. Studies On The
Transverse Diameter Of The Uterine Cavity Of the Normal Fertile Women
In Liao-Ning District Of China. Chinese Journal of Reproduction and
Contraception. 1981,1(3):10-15.
- Norman D Goldstuck. Dimensional analysis of the endometrial cavity:
how many dimensions should the ideal intrauterine device or system
have?Int J Womens Health,2018:10 165–168.
- Janina Kaislasuo, MD, Oskari Heikinheimo, MD, PhD, Pekka Lähteenmäki,
MD, PhD, and Satu Suhonen, MD, PhD.Predicting Painful or Difficult
Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulligravid Women. Obstet Gynecol
2014;124:345–53.
- Yu D, Li TC, Xia E, Huang X, Liu Y, Peng X. Factors affecting
reproductive outcome of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman’s
syndrome. Fertil Steril 2008;89:715–22.
- Jaime Knopman, M.D. and Alan B. Copperman, M.D. Value of 3D Ultrasound
in the management of suspected Asherman’s syndrome. J Reprod
Med.2007,52:1016-1022.
- Gadelha Da Costa A, Filho FM, Ferreira AC, Spara P, Mauad FM. Uterine
volume in adolescents. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004;30:7–10.
- Canteiro R, Bahamondes MV, dos Santos Fernandes A, Espejo-Arce X,
Marchi NM, Bahamondes L. Length of the endometrial cavity as measured
by uterine sounding and ultrasonography in women of different
parities. Contraception 2010;81:515–519.
Figure 1: Parameters of 3D measurement: (A) Uterine cavity
width; (B) Lateral indentation angles right and left; (C) Cornual angles
right and left; (D) Uterine cavity length; (E) Uterine cavity area; (F)
Internal os width; (G) Lateral indentation depths right and left; (H)
Identification of anatomical internal os in coronal plane utilizing the
function of Fixed ROI in 2D sagittal view.