REFERENCES
1. Raheem OA, Khandwala YS, Sur RL, et al. Burden of Urolithiasis:
Trends in Prevalence, Treatments, and Costs. Eur Urol Focus. 2017
Feb;3(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.04.001.
2. Van Cleynenbreugel B, Kılıç Ö, Akand M. Retrograde intrarenal surgery
for renal stones - Part 1. Turk J Urol. 2017;43(2):112-121. doi:
10.5152/tud.2017.03708.
3. C. Türk, A. Skolarikos, A. Neisius, et al. EAU guidelines on
Urolithiasis. 2019
4. Fan S, Gong B, Hao Z, et al. Risk factors of infectious complications
following flexible ureteroscope with a holmium laser: a retrospective
study. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(7):11252-11259.
5. Ozgor F, Sahan M, Cubuk A, et al. Factors affecting infectious
complications following flexible ureterorenoscopy. Urolithiasis.
2019;47(5):481-486.
6. Hyams ES, Munver R, Bird VG, et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and
holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that
measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol.
2010;24(10):1583-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0629.
7. Zheng C, Xiong B, Wang H, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus
percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal stones
>2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urol Int. 2014;93(4):417-24. doi:
10.1159/000363509.
8. Geraghty R, Abourmarzouk O, Rai B, et al. Evidence for
Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Fragmentation (URSL) for Large Renal Stones
in the Modern Era. Curr Urol Rep. 2015Aug;16(8):54. doi:
10.1007/s11934-015-0529-3.
9. PJS Osther. Risks of flexible ureterorenoscopy: pathophysiology and
prevention.. Urolithiasis. 2018;46(1):59-67. doi:
10.1007/s00240-017-1018-6.
10. Berardinelli F, De Francesco P, Marchioni M, et al. Infective
complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery: a new standardized
classification system. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48(11):1757-1762.
11. Sorokin I, Cardona-Grau DK, Rehfuss A, et al. Stone volume is best
predictor of operative time required in retrograde intrarenal surgery
for renal calculi: implications for surgical planning and quality
improvement. Urolithiasis. 2016;44(6):545-550. DOI:
10.1007/s00240-016-0875-8.
12. Jacquemet B, Martin L, Pastori J, et al. Comparison of the efficacy
and morbidity of flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones
compared with other renal locations. J Endourol. 2014;28(10):1183-7.
doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0286.
13. Jung H, Osther PJS. Intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible
ureterorenoscopy. Springerplus. 2015 Jul 24;4:373. doi:
10.1186/s40064-015-1114-4.
14. Thomsen HS, Talner LB, Higgins CB. Intrarenal backflow during
retrograde pyelography with graded intrapelvic pressure. A radiologic
study. Invest Radiol. 1982;17(6):593-603.
15. Thomsen HS, Larsen S, Talner LB. Pyelorenal backflow during
retrograde pyelography in normal and ischemic porcine kidneys. A
radiologic and pathoanatomic study. Eur Urol. 1982;8(5):291-7.
16. Thomsen HS, Dorph S, Larsen S, et al. Intrarenal backflow and renal
perfusion during increased intrapelvic pressure in excised porcine
kidneys. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1983;24(4):327-336.
17. Thomsen HS, Dorph S, Olsen S. Pyelorenal backflow in rabbits
following clamping of the renal vein and artery: radiologic and
microscopic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1982;23(2):143-8.
18. Cindolo L, Castellan P, Scoffone CM, et al. Mortality and flexible
ureteroscopy: analysis of six cases. World J Urol. 2016;34(3):305-10.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1642-0.
19. Auge BK, Pietrow PK, Lallas CD, et al. Ureteral access sheath
provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine
flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Endourol. 2004;18(1):33-6.