Figure legends
FIGURE 1. Correlations between EASI score and laboratory factors in AD patients. (A) TARC. (B) LDH. (C) Total serum IgE. Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.
FIGURE 2. Comparison of basophil responsiveness without stimulation (A, C) and with anti-IgE antibody stimulation (B, D) between AD patients and HCs. (A) Baseline CD203c. (B) CD203c response ratio. (C) Baseline CD63. (D) CD63 response ratio. Line indicates median. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test.
FIGURE 3. Correlations between CD63 response ratio and clinical/laboratory factors in AD patients. (A) EASI score. (B) TARC. (C) LDH. (D) Total serum IgE. Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.
FIGURE 4. Comparison of FcεRI expression and surface-bound IgE expression between AD patients and HCs. (A) FcεRI expression. (B) Surface-bound IgE. Line indicates median. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test.
FIGURE 5. Correlations between surface-bound IgE and clinical/laboratory factors in AD patients. (A) EASI score. (B) TARC. (C) LDH. (D) Total serum IgE. Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.
FIGURE 6. Comparison of CD203c response ratios with anti-FcεRI stimulation or anti-IgE stimulation. (A) AD patients. Line indicates median. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test. (B) HCs. Line indicates mean. Statistical analyses were performed using the unpaired t -test.