Figure legends
FIGURE 1. Correlations between EASI score and laboratory factors in AD
patients. (A) TARC. (B) LDH. (C) Total serum IgE. Statistical analyses
were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.
FIGURE
2. Comparison of basophil responsiveness without stimulation (A, C) and
with anti-IgE antibody stimulation (B, D) between AD patients and HCs.
(A) Baseline CD203c. (B) CD203c response ratio. (C) Baseline CD63. (D)
CD63 response ratio. Line indicates median. Statistical analyses were
performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test.
FIGURE 3. Correlations between CD63 response ratio and
clinical/laboratory factors in AD patients. (A) EASI score. (B) TARC.
(C) LDH. (D) Total serum IgE. Statistical analyses were performed using
Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.
FIGURE 4. Comparison of FcεRI expression and surface-bound IgE
expression between AD patients and HCs. (A) FcεRI expression. (B)
Surface-bound IgE. Line indicates median. Statistical analyses were
performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test.
FIGURE 5. Correlations between surface-bound IgE and clinical/laboratory
factors in AD patients. (A) EASI score. (B) TARC. (C) LDH. (D) Total
serum IgE. Statistical analyses
were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.
FIGURE 6. Comparison of CD203c response ratios with anti-FcεRI
stimulation or anti-IgE stimulation. (A) AD patients. Line indicates
median. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann–Whitney
U-test. (B) HCs. Line indicates mean. Statistical analyses were
performed using the unpaired t -test.