References

1. Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C. Clinical rationale for cryopreservation of entire embryo cohorts in lieu of fresh transfer. Fertility and sterility. 2014;102(1):3-9.
2. Cha J, Sun X, Dey SK. Mechanisms of implantation: strategies for successful pregnancy. Nat Med. 2012;18(12):1754-67.
3. Zhang S, Lin H, Kong S, Wang S, Wang H, Wang H, et al. Physiological and molecular determinants of embryo implantation. Mol Aspects Med. 2013;34(5):939-80.
4. Cedars MI. Fresh versus frozen: initial transfer or cumulative cycle results: how do we interpret results and design studies? Fertility and sterility. 2016;106(2):251-6.
5. Davenport MJ, Vollenhoven B, Talmor AJ. Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone-Agonist Triggering and a Freeze-All Approach: The Final Step in Eliminating Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome? Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017;72(5):296-308.
6. Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Levi-Setti PE, Soscia D, Orlando G, Albani E, et al. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation. Human reproduction. 2018;33(11):1992-2001.
7. Roque M, Nuto Nobrega B, Valle M, Sampaio M, Geber S, Haahr T, et al. Freeze-all strategy in IVF/ICSI cycles: an update on clinical utility. Panminerva Med. 2019;61(1):52-7.
8. Roque M, Haahr T, Esteves SC, Humaidan P. The ’Big Freeze’: freeze-all should not be used for everyone. Human reproduction. 2018.
9. Coutifaris C. Freeze-only in vitro fertilization cycles for all? Fertility and sterility. 2017;108(2):233-4.
10. Kallen B, Finnstrom O, Nygren KG, Olausson PO. Temporal trends in multiple births after in vitro fertilisation in Sweden, 1982-2001: a register study. BMJ. 2005;331(7513):382-3.
11. Kallen B, Finnstrom O, Lindam A, Nilsson E, Nygren KG, Otterblad Olausson P. Trends in delivery and neonatal outcome after in vitro fertilization in Sweden: data for 25 years. Human reproduction. 2010;25(4):1026-34.
12. Kallen B, Finnstrom O, Nygren KG, Olausson PO. In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: infant outcome after different IVF fertilization methods. Fertility and sterility. 2005;84(3):611-7.
13. Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive T, Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive M. Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertility and sterility. 2012;97(4):835-42.
14. Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford SB, Folger SG, Jamieson DJ, Warner L, et al. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2014. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017;66(6):1-24.
15. Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Stern JE, Baker VL, Widra E, et al. Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(5):676 e1-7.
16. McLernon DJ, Harrild K, Bergh C, Davies MJ, de Neubourg D, Dumoulin JC, et al. Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;341:c6945.
17. Monteleone PAA, Peregrino PFM, Baracat EC, Serafini PC. Transfer of 2 Embryos Using a Double-Embryo Transfer Protocol Versus 2 Sequential Single-Embryo Transfers: The Impact on Multiple Pregnancy. Reprod Sci. 2018;25(10):1501-8.
18. Monteleone PA, Mirisola RJ, Goncalves SP, Baracat EC, Serafini PC. Outcomes of elective cryopreserved single or double embryo transfers following failure to conceive after fresh single embryo transfer. Reproductive biomedicine online. 2016;33(2):161-7.
19. Monteleone PAA, Petersen PGMF, Peregrino PFM, Miorin J, Gomes AP, Fujii MG, et al. Should single embryo transfer to be used for patients with any kind of infertility factor? Preliminary outcomes. 22st Annual Congress of the SBRA; Brasilia, DF: JBRA Assisted Reproduction; 2018. p. 263.
20. Sunkara SK, Chinta P, Kamath MS. Perinatal Outcomes Following Assisted Reproductive Technology. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2019;12(3):177-81.
21. Ata B, Kaplan B, Danzer H, Glassner M, Opsahl M, Tan SL, et al. Array CGH analysis shows that aneuploidy is not related to the number of embryos generated. Reproductive biomedicine online. 2012;24(6):614-20.
22. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340(8810):17-8.
23. Veeck LL. An atlas of human gametes and conceptuses : an illustrated reference for assisted reproductive technology. New York: Parthenon Pub. Group; 1999. 215 p. p.
24. Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertility and sterility. 2000;73(6):1155-8.
25. Shin JJ, Jeong Y, Nho E, Jee BC. Clinical outcomes of frozen embryo transfer cycles after freeze-all policy to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018;61(4):497-504.
26. Wu MY, Chung CH, Pan SP, Jou GC, Chen MJ, Chang CH, et al. Advantages of cumulative pregnancy outcomes in freeze-all strategy in high responders - A case-control matching analysis of a large cohort. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018;117(8):676-84.
27. Acharya KS, Acharya CR, Bishop K, Harris B, Raburn D, Muasher SJ. Freezing of all embryos in in vitro fertilization is beneficial in high responders, but not intermediate and low responders: an analysis of 82,935 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertility and sterility. 2018;110(5):880-7.
28. Zaca C, Bazzocchi A, Pennetta F, Bonu MA, Coticchio G, Borini A. Cumulative live birth rate in freeze-all cycles is comparable to that of a conventional embryo transfer policy at the cleavage stage but superior at the blastocyst stage. Fertility and sterility. 2018;110(4):703-9.
29. Le KD, Vuong LN, Ho TM, Dang VQ, Pham TD, Pham CT, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of freeze-only or fresh embryo transfer in IVF of non-PCOS women. Human reproduction. 2018;33(10):1907-14.
30. Kuroda K, Ezoe K, Kato K, Yabuuchi A, Segawa T, Kobayashi T, et al. Infertility treatment strategy involving combined freeze-all embryos and single vitrified-warmed embryo transfer during hormonal replacement cycle for in vitro fertilization of women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44(5):922-8.
31. He QH, Wang L, Liang LL, Zhang HL, Zhang CL, Li HS, et al. Clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer in patients requiring whole embryo freezing. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2016;62(2):133-8.
32. Sigalos G, Triantafyllidou O, Vlahos NF. Novel embryo selection techniques to increase embryo implantation in IVF attempts. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(6):1117-24.
33. Kliman HJ, Frankfurter D. Clinical approach to recurrent implantation failure: evidence-based evaluation of the endometrium. Fertility and sterility. 2019;111(4):618-28.
34. Teh WT, McBain J, Rogers P. What is the contribution of embryo-endometrial asynchrony to implantation failure? Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics. 2016;33(11):1419-30.
35. Diaz-Gimeno P, Horcajadas JA, Martinez-Conejero JA, Esteban FJ, Alama P, Pellicer A, et al. A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertility and sterility. 2011;95(1):50-60, e1-15.
36. Garrido-Gomez T, Quinonero A, Antunez O, Diaz-Gimeno P, Bellver J, Simon C, et al. Deciphering the proteomic signature of human endometrial receptivity. Human reproduction. 2014;29(9):1957-67.
37. Garrido-Gomez T, Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Diaz-Gimeno P, Vilella F, Simon C. Profiling the gene signature of endometrial receptivity: clinical results. Fertility and sterility. 2013;99(4):1078-85.
38. Gomez E, Ruiz-Alonso M, Miravet J, Simon C. Human Endometrial Transcriptomics: Implications for Embryonic Implantation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015;5(7):a022996.
39. Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Diaz-Gimeno P, Gomez E, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Carranza F, et al. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertility and sterility. 2013;100(3):818-24.
40. Simon C. Introduction: Do microbes in the female reproductive function matter? Fertility and sterility. 2018;110(3):325-6.
41. Moreno I, Simon C. Deciphering the effect of reproductive tract microbiota on human reproduction. Reprod Med Biol. 2019;18(1):40-50.
42. Moreno I, Simon C. Relevance of assessing the uterine microbiota in infertility. Fertility and sterility. 2018;110(3):337-43.
43. Bassil R, Casper R, Samara N, Hsieh TB, Barzilay E, Orvieto R, et al. Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer? Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics. 2018;35(7):1301-5.
44. Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(2):139-55.
45. Zeng M, Su S, Li L. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes after vitrification at the cleavage and blastocyst stage: a meta-analysis. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics. 2018;35(1):127-34.
46. Zhu Q, Chen Q, Wang L, Lu X, Lyu Q, Wang Y, et al. Live birth rates in the first complete IVF cycle among 20 687 women using a freeze-all strategy. Human reproduction. 2018;33(5):924-9.
47. ASRM/SART. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertility and sterility. 2017;107(4):901-3.
48. Eubanks AA, Anthony DeAngelis, Mae W. Healy, Rhiana D. Saunders, Saioa Torrealday, Alan H. Decherney, et al. The Continued Push Towards Eliminating Twin Pregnancy: The Clinical Impact of the 2017 ASRM Embryo Transfer Guidelines. Fertility and sterility. 2019;112(3):Supplement, Page e146