References
References
Alho CJR. 2008. Biodiversity of the Pantanal: response to seasonal flooding regime and to environmental degradation. Brazilian Journal of Biology 68: 957–966.
APG IV. 2016. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 181: 1–20.
Ballantyne G, Baldock KC, Willmer PG. 2015. Constructing more informative plant–pollinator networks: visitation and pollen deposition networks in a heathland plant community. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282(1814): 20151130.
Barônio GJ, de Brito VLG, Nogueira A, Rech AR. 2020. Beyond robbery: the role of upside‑down behaviour performed by small oil‑collecting bees in Malpighiaceae. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 14: 613–621.
Bartomeus I, Gravel D, Tylianakis JM, Aizen MA, Dickie IA, Bernard‐Verdier M. 2016. A common framework for identifying linkage rules across different types of interactions. Functional Ecology 30(12): 1894-1903
Baselga A. 2010. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19: 134–143.
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.
Journal of Statistical Software 67: 1–48.
Beckett SJ. 2016. Improved community detection in weighted bipartite networks. Royal Society Open Science 3: 140536.
Blüthgen N, Menzel F. Blüthgen N. 2006. Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. Ecology 6: 1–12.
Bosch J, Martín González AM, Rodrigo A, Navarro D. 2009. Plant-pollinator networks: adding the pollinator’s perspective. Ecology Letters 12: 409–419.
Burkle LA, Alarcón R. 2011. The future of plant-pollinator diversity: Understanding interaction networks across time, space, and global change. American Journal of Botany 98(3): 528-38.
Burkle LA, Myers JA, Belote RT. 2016. The beta‐diversity of species interactions: Untangling the drivers of geographic variation in plant–pollinator diversity and function across scales. American Journal of Botany 103: 118-128.
CaraDonna PJ, Petry WK, Brennan RM, Cunningham JL, Bronstein JL, Waser NM, Sanders NJ. 2017. Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks. Ecology Letters 20: 385–394.
Carstensen DW, Sabatino M, Trøjelsgaard K, Morellato LPC. 2014. Beta diversity of plant-pollinator networks and the spatial turnover of pairwise interactions. PLoS One 9(11): e112903.
Carvalho JC, Cardoso P, Gomes P. 2012. Determining the relative roles of species replacement and species richness differences in generating beta-diversity patterns. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21: 760–771 (2012).
Chacoff NP, Vazquez DP, Lomascolo SB, Stevani EL, Dorado J, Padron B. 2012. Evaluating sampling completeness in a desert plant-pollinator network. Journal of Animal Ecology 81: 190-200.
Chao A. 1984. Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population.
Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 11: 265–270.
Colwell RK, Coddington JA. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 345: 101–118.
Dafni A. 1992. Pollination ecology: a practical approach, University Press, New York. 272pp.
Dalsgaard B, Schleuning M, Maruyama PK, Dehling DM, Sonne J, Vizentin‐Bugoni J, Zanata TB, Fjeldså J, Böhning‐Gaese K, Rahbek C. 2017. Opposed latitudinal patterns of network‐derived and dietary specialization in avian plant–frugivore interaction systems. Ecography 40(12): 1395-1401.
Danieli-Silva A, Souza JTM, Donatti AJ, Campos RP, Vicente-Silva J, Freitas L, Varassin IG. 2012. Do pollination syndromes cause modularity and predict interactions in a pollination network in tropical high-altitude grasslands? Oikos 121: 35–43.
de Manincor N, Hautekèete N, Mazoyer C, Moreau P, Piquot Y, Schatz B, Schmitt E, Zélazny M, Massol F. 2020. How biased is our perception of plant-pollinator networks? A comparison of visit-and pollen-based representations of the same networks. Acta Oecologica 105: 103551.
Dorado J, Vázquez DP, Stevani EL, Chacoff NP. 2011. Rareness and specialization in plant–pollinator networks. Ecology 92: 19–25.
Dormann CF, Gruber B, Fründ J. 2008. Introducing the bipartite package: analysing ecological networks. R News 8: 8–11.
Dormann CF, Frund J, Bluthgen N, Gruber B. 2009. Indices, graphs and null models: analyzing bipartite ecological networks. The Open Ecology Journal 2: 7–24.
Erdtman G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy-angiosperms. Almqvisit & Wiksell, Stockholm. 539pp.
Fox J, Weisberg S. 2011. An {R} companion to applied regression (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Frankie GW, Haber WW, Opler PA, Bawa KS. 1983. Characteristics and organization of the large bee pollination system in the Costa Rican dry forest. In: Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Jones CE, Little RJ. [eds]. New York, Scientific and Academic Editions, New York, 441–448.
Fründ J, McCann KS, Williams NM. 2016. Sampling bias is a challenge for quantifying specialization and network structure: lessons from a quantitative niche model. Oikos 125(4): 502-513.
Graham CH, Weinstein BG. 2018. Towards a predictive model of species interaction beta diversity. Ecology Letters 21: 1299–1310.
Guimarães Jr PR. 2020. The structure of ecological networks across levels of organization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 51: 433-460.
Hartig F. 2020. DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-Level / Mixed) Regression Models. R package version 0.3.3.0. http://florianhartig.github.io/DHARMa/
Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal 50: 346–363.
Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A. 2014. CRAN - Package iNEXT: iNterpolation and EXTrapolation for species diversity. R package version 2.0. Available at: http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/blog/software-download.
Jordano P. 2016. Sampling networks of ecological interactions. Functional Ecology 30: 1883–1893.
Kessler M, Abrahamczyk S, Bos M, Buchori D, Putra DD, Gradstein SR, Höhn P, Kluge J, Orend F, Pitopang R et al. 2009. Alpha and beta diversity of plants and animals along a tropical land‐use gradient. Ecological Applications 19: 2142–2156.
Legendre P. 2014. Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 23: 1324–1334.
Lima GO, Leite AV, Souza CS, Castro CC, Bezerra ELS. 2020. A multilayer network in an herbaceous tropical community reveals multiple roles of floral visitors. Oikos 00: 1–11.
Machado IC, Lopes AV. 2004. Floral traits and pollination systems in the Caatinga, a Brazilian Tropical Dry Forest. Annals of Botany 94: 365–376.
Maglianesi MA, Blüthgen N, Böhning-Gaese K, Schleuning M. 2015. Functional structure and specialization in three tropical plant–hummingbird interaction networks across an elevational gradient in Costa Rica. Ecography 38: 1119–1128.
Magrach A, González-Varo JP, Boiffier M, Vilà M, Bartomeus I. 2017. Honeybee spillover reshuffles pollinator diets and affects plant reproductive success. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1(9): 1299.
Maruyama PK, Vizentin‐Bugoni J, Oliveira GM, Oliveira PE, Dalsgaard B. 2014. Morphological and spatio‐temporal mismatches shape a neotropical savanna plant‐hummingbird network. Biotropica 46: 740–747.
Mesquita‐Neto JN, Blüthgen N, Schlindwein C. 2018. Flowers with poricidal anthers and their complex interaction networks - Disentangling legitimate pollinators and illegitimate visitors. Functional Ecology 32: 2321–2332.
Minnaar C, Anderson B, de Jager ML, Karron JD. 2019. Plant–pollinator interactions along the pathway to paternity. Annals of Botany 123(2): 225-245.
Noreika N, Bartomeus I, Winsa M, Bommarco R, Öckinger E. 2019. Pollinator foraging flexibility mediates rapid plant-pollinator network restoration in semi-natural grasslands. Scientific Reports 9: 1–11.
Novotny V. 2009. Beta diversity of plant–insect food webs in tropical forests: a conceptual framework. Insect Conservation Diversity 2: 5–9.
Nunes da Cunha C, Junk WJ. 2009. A preliminary classification of habitats of the Pantanal of Mato Grosso and Mato Grosso do Sul, and its relation to national and international wetland classification systems. In: The Pantanal: Ecology, biodiversity and sustainable management of a large neotropical seasonal wetland. Junk WJ, Da Silva CJ, Nunes da Cunha C, Wantzen KM. [eds]. Pensoft Pub, Sofia, 127–141.
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H. 2018. Package ‘vegan’ - Community Ecology Package.
Olesen JM, Dupont YL, Ehlers BK, Hansen DM. 2007. The openness of a flower and its number of flower‐visitor species. Taxon 56: 729–736.
Patefield WM. 1981. Algorithm AS 159: An efficient method of generating random R x C tables with given row and column totals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) 30: 91–97.
Phillips RD, Peakall R, van der Niet T, Johnson SD. 2020. Niche perspectives on plant–pollinator interactions. Trends in Plant Science 25: 779–793.
Poisot T, Canard E, Mouillot D, Mouquet N, Gravel D. 2012. The dissimilarity of species interaction networks. Ecology Letters 15: 1353–1361.
Popic TJ, Wardle GM, Davila YC. 2013. Flower‐visitor networks only partially predict the function of pollen transport by bees. Austral Ecology 38: 76-86.
Pott A, Oliveira AK, Damasceno-Junior GA, Silva JSV. 2011. Plant diversity of the Pantanal wetland. Brazilian Journal of Biology 71: 265–273.
R Development Core Team. 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at <https:// www.r-project.org/>. Access on 22 April 2020.
Rabelo LS, Vilhena AM, Bastos EM, Aguiar CM, Augusto SC. 2015. Oil-collecting bee–flower interaction network: do bee size and anther type influence the use of pollen sources? Apidologie 46: 465–477.
Ramírez-Burbano MB, Stiles FG, González C, Amorim FW, Dalsgaard B, Maruyama PK. 2017. The role of the endemic and critically endangered Eriocnemis mirabilis in plant-hummingbird networks of Colombian Andes. Biotropica 49: 555–564.
Ramsar & MMA. 2010. Cuidar das Zonas Úmidas – uma resposta às mudanças climáticas. MMA, Brasília, 28 p.
Rosas-Guerrero V, Aguilar R, Martén-Rodríguez S, Ashworth L, Lopezaraiza-Mikel M, Bastida JM, Quesada M. 2014. A quantitative review of pollination syndromes: do floral traits predict effective pollinators? Ecology Letters 17: 388–400.
Santiago-Hernandez MH, Marten-Rodrıguez S, Lopezaraiza-Mikel M, Oyama K, Gonzalez-Rodrıguez A, Quesada M. 2019. The role of pollination effectiveness on the traits of interaction networks: from floral visitation to plant fitness. Ecology 100: e02803.
Sazatornil FD, Moré M, Benitez-Vieyra S, Cocucci AA, Kitching IJ, Schlumpberger BO, Oliveira PE, Sazima M, Amorim FW. 2016. Beyond neutral and forbidden links: morphological matches and the assembly of mutualistic hawkmoth–plant networks. Journal of Animal Ecology 85: 1586–1594.
Simpson BB, Neff JL. 1981. Floral rewards: alternatives to pollen and nectar. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 68: 301–322.
Soininen J, Heino J, Wang J. 2018. A meta‐analysis of nestedness and turnover components of beta diversity across organisms and ecosystems. Global Ecology and Biogeography 27: 96–109.
Souza CS, Maruyama PK, Aoki C, Sigrist MR, Raizer J, Gross CL, Araujo AC. 2018. Temporal variation in plant–pollinator networks from seasonal tropical environments: Higher specialization when resources are scarce. Journal of Ecology 106: 2409–2420.
Trøjelsgaard K, Jordano P, Carstensen DW, Olesen JM. 2015. Geographical variation in mutualistic networks: similarity, turnover and partner fidelity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282(1802): 20142925.
Tylianakis JM, Morris RJ. 2017. Ecological networks across environmental gradients. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 48: 25–48.
Vianna MR, Luz CFP, Kleinert AMP. 2014. Interaction networks in a Brazilian cerrado: what changes when you add palynological information to floral visitor data? Apidologie 45: 418-430.
Vizentin‐Bugoni J, Maruyama PK, Debastiani VJ, Duarte LDS, Dalsgaard B, Sazima M. 2016. Influences of sampling effort on detected patterns and structuring processes of a Neotropical plant–hummingbird network. Journal of Animal Ecology 85: 262–272.
Vizentin-Bugoni J, Maruyama PK, Souza CS, Ollerton J, Rech AR, Sazima M. 2018. Plant-pollinator networks in the tropics: A review. In: Ecological networks in the tropics. Dáttilo W, V Rico-Gray [eds.]. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 73–91.
Westerkamp C, Claßen-Bockhoff R. 2007. Bilabiate flowers: the ultimate response to bees? Annals of Botany 100: 361–374.
Whittaker RH. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs 30: 280–338.
Zhao YH, Lázaro A, Ren ZX, Zhou W, Li HD, Tao ZB, Xu K, Wu ZK, Wolfe LM, Li DZ et al. 2019. The topological differences between visitation and pollen transport networks: a comparison in species rich communities of the Himalaya–Hengduan Mountains. Oikos 128: 551–562.
Figure S1. Relation between the distance among plots and the beta diversity and beta diversity of interactions measures.
Table S1. Plant species, their floral traits analysed and differences between the species indices.
Table S2. Sampling completeness of the networks studied.
Table S3. Results from Generalized Linear Models testing the effect of sampling method on changes in beta-diversity indices, network structure and species level indices.
Table S4. Results from Generalized Linear models testing beta diversity of species and interactions within and between the three different habitats studied
Table S5. Results from Linear Models testing the difference in degree and specialization of plant species in relation to plant species traits and the effect of sampling method in changes in species level indices.
Table S6. All interactions sampled using the plant-centred method.
Table S7. All interactions sampled using the pollinator-centred method.
Table S8. All interactions sampled using both pollinator and plant-centred method (combined data).
Table S9. Script for beta diversity of interactions analysis.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Rufford Foundation for a grant (RSG: 21366-1); CNPQ and CAPES for scholarships to CSS (Finance Code 001; FUNDECT/CAPES – n°03/2008 - PAPOS-MS, Process: 23/200.383/2008 and n° 44/2014 – PAPOS-MS, Process: 23/200.638/2014), the São Paulo Research Foundation for a Postdoctoral grant to PKM (FAPESP, Process: 2015/21457-4) and CNPq for a Productivity grant to ACA (310999/2018-9) and IGV (313801/2017-7). Special thanks also to Ignasi Bartomeus for the script and code provided for calculating beta diversity of interactions and the three anonymous reviewers for comments that greatly improved the quality of the manuscript.
Author Contributions statement
CSS, ACA, CLG and PKM conceived the ideas and designed methodology; CSS and KCBSS collected and organized the data; CSS analysed the data; CSS and PKM wrote the first draft of the manuscript; CSS, PKM, KCBSS, IGV, CLG and ACA contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.
Competing Interests statement
The authors declare no competing financial interests.