Key Clinical Message:
High index of suspicion of ectopic (much likely ovarian) pregnancy
should be considered if a woman with IUD in situ presents with abdominal
pain, vaginal bleeding and positive urine pregnancy test.
Introduction:
Copper T is a type of Intrauterine Device (IUD), which has a
contraceptive failure rate of 0.6% with perfect use and 0.8% with
typical use [1]. Several risk factors for ectopic pregnancy have
been identified which include previous history of ectopic pregnancy,
prior tubal surgery, smoking, prior Intrauterine Device (IUD) use, etc.
[2]. Women with history of IUD use in past have 16.27 times the risk
of Ectopic pregnancy compared with women who have used no contraception
[3] For every 1000 live births, about 12 visits to the Emergency
Department in the United States have been due to Ectopic pregnancy
[4]. Ovarian pregnancy, which occurs when the fertilized ovum gets
trapped in the ovary, constitute around three percent of all ectopic
pregnancies [5]. We are reporting a case of a woman with
intrauterine contraceptive device in situ with ruptured ovarian ectopic
pregnancy.
Case:
A 33-year-old lady with G4P3L3 had presented to Emergency Department
(ED) of Dhaulagiri Hospital, Nepal with history of amenorrhea for 43
days and irregular vaginal bleeding in the past 2 weeks with partial
soaking of one pad per day. She had abdominal pain and occasional
dizziness on the same day of visit to the ED. She also gave history of
having regular menstruation cycle in past. Her last child birth was nine
years back. She had been using Copper T (Cu T 380A) as a form of
contraception since last five years. She gave no history of use of any
form of contraception prior to that. She is nonsmoker and gave no
history of any medical or surgical illnesses in past.
She was well oriented to time, place and person but looked pale. Her
Blood pressure was 110 mm Hg systolic and 60 mm Hg diastolic and pulse
was 108 beats per min. On abdominal examination there was generalized
tenderness over the suprapubic region with mild distension. Vulva and
vagina looked healthy. Copper T thread was visible on the speculum
examination and cervix looked healthy (Figure 1). Her pelvic examination
was significant for a firm mobile mass around the left adnexa of 4 cm ×
4 cm. Despite the history of contraception, the examination findings led
to a strong suspicion towards the differential diagnosis of ectopic
pregnancy.
We ordered a urine pregnancy test which came out to be positive. We
performed an abdominal sonography on her which showed a well-defined
heterogenous lesion of 3.9 cm × 4.2 cm in the right adnexa overlying the
ovary. Ultrasound examination also revealed gross intraperitoneal fluid
collection and Copper T in situ (Figure 2).
We decided to perform exploratory laparotomy on the patient after taking
proper informed consent for removal of IUD and the operative procedure.
Hemoperitoneum of 1 liter was appreciated. The right ovary size was 4 cm
× 5 cm size with defect of 1 cm on its surface with firm mass inside and
clots overlying it (Figure 3). Bilateral fallopian tubes and left sided
ovary were normal. We performed right sided oophorectomy (Figure 4). The
IUD string was pulled and the device was removed in the operation
theater (Figure 4). Gross examination of the cross-section of the ovary
showed fetal tissue with placental component thus confirming ovarian
ectopic pregnancy (Figure 5). Her postoperative period was uneventful
and she was pleased with overall management at this center. She gave
informed consent for the publication of her case report.
Discussion:
IUD is a top tier contraceptive which decreases the incidence of
pregnancy overall [1].Various adverse pregnancy events may occur
when IUD is in place namely spontaneous abortion, septic abortion, fetal
malformation, preterm labor and chorioamnionitis [6]. Women with
history of IUD use in past have significant risk of having ectopic
pregnancy compared with women who used no contraception [3]. Copper
T and Levonorgesterel containing IUD are modern generation of IUD with
ectopic pregnancy rates of 0.2 per 1,000 woman-year [7]. Then again,
when we consider the possibility of ectopic pregnancy with the current
use of IUD, literature has limited answer.
A study, with 287 cases with ectopic pregnancy, done by Pagano had shown
40 patients had IUD in situ [8]. Among them, 80.5% used Lippes Loop
as IUD [8]. However, given the differences between Lippes Loop and
the IUD used at present, it may not be suitable to draw conclusions
regarding the relationship between current IUDs and the risk of ectopic
pregnancy.
Raziel and colleagues found a strong association of ovarian pregnancy
and IUD in situ. Out of 19 diagnosed with ovarian ectopic pregnancy, 13
women (68 %) had been using IUD during diagnosis [9]. But then,
this study doesn’t mention the type of IUD or if it was lying misplaced
[9].
Ercal et al described two cases where ovarian pregnancy was associated
with IUD use [10]. However, both the cases don’t qualify for
concurrent use of IUD and ovarian pregnancy. While the first case had
the IUD removed one month prior to the diagnosis of ovarian pregnancy,
the other woman had used Lippes Loop for almost 16 years [10].
Similar to our study, Annaiah and colleagues had reported a case of
ovarian ectopic pregnancy with IUD in situ [11]. In their case, the
patient was hemodynamically stable and was managed laparoscopically
[11]. The patient in our study was tachycardic and ultrasonography
revealed features of gross collection intraperitoneally and was managed
with laparotomy. Another case of primary ovarian ectopic pregnancy with
IUD in situ was managed with laparotomy, wedge reconstruction and repair
of the ovary [12]. The defect was limited on the superficial surface
which was managed with reconstructive procedures in that case. On the
contrary, in our case the defect was deep and fetal tissue invaded the
ovary. This had prompted for removal of the ovary in our scenario.
Findings of tubal ectopic pregnancy with IUD in situ was seen in another
case report by Neth et al [13]. Another reported case of ovarian
ectopic pregnancy with concurrent use of IUD encourages the use of
sonography in women with abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding and positive
urine pregnancy tests [14]. The diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy will
not be missed by this approach.
The cellular and humoral components of IUD generate inflammatory
reaction of the endometrium. These elements are expressed at the tissue
and fluid content of the uterine cavity which prevents fertilization
[15]. The uterine-tubal junction patency in human allows the passage
of air and fluid contents from uterine cavity to the tubal lumen. Thus,
the Copper ions in the tube is increased to similar amounts to that in
uterine fluid [16]. This suggests that aside from preventing uterine
pregnancy IUD also protects against tubal ectopic pregnancy.
Most case studies in women with ectopic pregnancy and IUD in situ are
invariably ovarian pregnancy [9-12, 14]. With these evidences, it
looks necessary to further study the association of IUD and Ovarian
pregnancy and thus highlight the concept of ‘IUD Associated Ovarian
Pregnancy Phenomenon’. The idea is, IUD leads to mild inflammation of
the uterus and nearby fallopian tube and also may lead to obstruction in
ovum conveyance [17]. This property of IUD would be responsible for
preventive action of it on pregnancy (both on the uterine cavity and the
fallopian tube). Additionally, as ovary is devoid of inflammatory action
of the device, when ectopic pregnancy occur, ovary becomes the most
likely site of pregnancy.
A long-term study is required to prove this hypothesis and draw a
conclusion to the statement. Nevertheless, limiting factor to conduct
this kind of research would be the rarity of pregnancy conceived with
IUD and infrequency of ovarian pregnancy overall. Yet, high index of
suspicion of ovarian pregnancy should be considered if a woman with IUD
in situ presents with abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding and positive
urine pregnancy test.