References list
1. Nilsson U, Goras C, Wallentin FY, et al. The Swedish Safety Attitudes
Questionnaire-Operating Room Version: Psychometric Properties in the
Surgical Team. J Perianesth Nurs 2018;33(6):935-45. doi:
10.1016/j.jopan.2017.09.009 [published Online First: 2018/11/20]
2. Cruz SA, Idowu O, Ho A, et al. Differing perceptions of preoperative
communication among surgical team members. The American Journal of
Surgery 2019;217(1):1-6. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.06.001
3. Erestam S, Haglind E, Bock D, et al. Changes in safety climate and
teamwork in the operating room after implementation of a revised WHO
checklist: a prospective interventional study. Patient Saf Surg2017;11:4. doi: 10.1186/s13037-017-0120-6 [published Online First:
2017/02/07]
4. Freytag J, Stroben F, Hautz WE, et al. Rating the quality of
teamwork—a comparison of novice and expert ratings using the Team
Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) in simulated emergencies.Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency
Medicine 2019;27(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0591-9
5. Fernandez Castelao E, Russo SG, Riethmuller M, et al. Effects of team
coordination during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review
of the literature. J Crit Care 2013;28(4):504-21. doi:
10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.01.005 [published Online First: 2013/04/23]
6. Lingard L, Regehr G, Orser B, et al. Evaluation of a preoperative
checklist and team briefing among surgeons, nurses, and
anesthesiologists to reduce failures in communication. Arch Surg2008;143(1):12-7; discussion 18. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.21
[published Online First: 2008/01/23]
7. Bliss LA, Ross-Richardson CB, Sanzari LJ, et al. Thirty-day outcomes
support implementation of a surgical safety checklist. J Am Coll
Surg 2012;215(6):766-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.07.015
[published Online First: 2012/09/07]
8. Lives SSS. WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery 2009. Geneva: World
Health Organization 2009
9. group ISOS. Global patient outcomes after elective surgery:
prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries.Br J Anaesth 2016;117(5):601-09. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew316
[published Online First: 2016/11/02]
10. de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, et al. The incidence and
nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual
Saf Health Care 2008;17(3):216-23. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023622
[published Online First: 2008/06/04]
11. Langelaan M, Broekens M, de Bruijne M, et al. Monitoring adverse
events in hospitals 2015/2016: a record review study of deceased
patients in Dutch hospitals. 2017 [In Dutch]
12. Einav Y, Gopher D, Kara I, et al. Preoperative Briefing in the
Operating Room: Shared Cognition, Teamwork, and Patient Safety.Chest 2010;137(2):443-49. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-1732
13. Fruhen L, Carpini JA, Parker S. Let’s Talk Teamwork:
Multi-Professional Team Briefings in WA Operating Theatres. 2017
14. Lee J, Lee H, Kim S, et al. Debriefing methods and learning outcomes
in simulation nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Nurse Education Today 2020;87:104345. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104345
15. Bartz-Kurycki MA, Anderson KT, Abraham JE, et al. Debriefing: the
forgotten phase of the surgical safety checklist. Journal of
Surgical Research 2017;213:222-27. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.072
16. Leong K, Hanskamp-Sebregts M, van der Wal RA, et al. Effects of
perioperative briefing and debriefing on patient safety: a prospective
intervention study. BMJ Open 2017;7(12):e018367. doi:
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018367 [published Online First: 2017/12/17]
17. Fruhen L, Carpini JA, Parker SK, et al. Perceived barriers to
multiprofessional team briefings in operating theatres: a qualitative
study. BMJ Open 2020;10(2):e032351. doi:
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032351
18. Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. Administrative Work Consumes
One-Sixth of U.S. Physicians’ Working Hours and Lowers their Career
Satisfaction. International Journal of Health Services2014;44(4):635-42. doi: 10.2190/HS.44.4.a
19. Dharampal N, Cameron C, Dixon E, et al. Attitudes and beliefs about
the surgical safety checklist: Just another tick box? Can J Surg2016;59(4):268-75. doi: 10.1503/cjs.002016
20. Ouwens M, Hulscher M, Akkermans R, et al. The Team Climate
Inventory: application in hospital teams and methodological
considerations. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2008;17(4):275.
doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.021543
21. Ragazzoni P, Baiardi P, Zotti A, et al. Italian validation of the
team climate inventory: A measure of team climate for innovation.Journal of Managerial Psychology 2002;17 doi:
10.1108/02683940210428128
22. Mathisen GE, Einarsen S, Jorstad K, et al. Climate for work group
creativity and innovation: Norwegian validation of the team climate
inventory (TCI). Scand J Psychol 2004;45(5):383-92. doi:
10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00420.x [published Online First:
2004/11/13]
23. Beaulieu MD, Dragieva N, Del Grande C, et al. The team climate
inventory as a measure of primary care teams’ processes: validation of
the French version. Healthc Policy 2014;9(3):40-54. [published
Online First: 2014/04/15]
24. Anderson N, West MA. The team climate inventory: Development of the
tci and its applications in teambuilding for innovativeness.European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology1996;5(1):53-66. doi: 10.1080/13594329608414840
25. Anderson NR, West MA. Measuring climate for work group innovation:
development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal
of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial,
Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior1998;19(3):235-58.
26. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content
Analysis. Qualitative Health Research 2005;15(9):1277-88. doi:
10.1177/1049732305276687
27. Grol R, Wensing M. What Drives Change? Barriers to and Incentives
for Achieving Evidence-Based Practice. The Medical journal of
Australia 2004;180:S57-60.
28. Pope C, Mays N. Pope C, Mays N. (Eds) (2006) Qualitative research in
health care 3rd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell/ BMJ2006.
29. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qualitative research in psychology 2006;3(2):77-101.
30. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting
qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and
focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care2007;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
31. Nathwani JN, Glarner CE, Law KE, et al. Integrating Postoperative
Feedback Into Workflow: Perceived Practices and Barriers. J Surg
Educ 2017;74(3):406-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.11.001 [published
Online First: 2016/11/25]
32. Brown C, Hofer T, Johal A, et al. An epistemology of patient safety
research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 1.
Conceptualising and developing interventions. Qual Saf Health
Care 2008;17(3):158-62. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023630 [published
Online First: 2008/06/04]
33. Flottorp SA, Oxman AD, Krause J, et al. A checklist for identifying
determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of
frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements
in healthcare professional practice. Implement Sci 2013;8:35.
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-35 [published Online First: 2013/03/26]
34. Clark V, Ivankova N. Why use mixed methods research? Identifying
rationales for mixing methods. Mixed methods research: A guide to
the field 2016:79-104.
35. Dykema J, Jones NR, Piche T, et al. Surveying clinicians by web:
current issues in design and administration. Eval Health Prof2013;36(3):352-81. doi: 10.1177/0163278713496630 [published Online
First: 2013/08/27]
36. Dobrow MJ, Orchard MC, Golden B, et al. Response Audit of an
Internet Survey of Health Care Providers and Administrators:
Implications for Determination of Response Rates. J Med Internet
Res 2008;10(4):e30. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1090