References:
- Paradies V, Banning A, Cao D, Chieffo A, Daemen J, Diletti R,
Hildick-Smith D, Kandzari DE, Kirtane AJ, Mehran R, Park DW, Tarantini
G, Smits PC, Van Mieghem NM. Provisional Strategy for Left Main Stem
Bifurcation Disease: A State-of-the-Art Review of Technique and
Outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Apr 10;16(7):743-758.
- Movahed MR, Stinis CT. A new proposed simplified classification of
coronary artery bifurcation lesions and bifurcation interventional
techniques. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006 May;18(5):199-204.
- Movahed MR. Coronary artery bifurcation lesion classifications,
interventional techniques and clinical outcome. Expert Rev Cardiovasc
Ther. 2008 Feb;6(2):261-74
- Movahed MR. Quantitative angiographic methods for bifurcation lesions:
a consensus statement from the European Bifurcation Group. Shortcoming
of the Medina classification as a preferred classification for
coronary artery bifurcation lesions in comparison to the Movahed
classification. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov 1;74(5):817-8.
- Movahed MR. Studies involving coronary bifurcation interventions
should utilize the most comprehensive and technically relevant Movahed
coronary bifurcation classification for better communication and
accuracy. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Apr 15;105(8):1204-5
- Movahed MR. B2 lesions are true bifurcation lesions simply categorized
as one group according to the Movahed bifurcation classification. J
Invasive Cardiol. 2010 May;22(5):252
- Movahed MR. Major limitations of randomized clinical trials involving
coronary artery bifurcation interventions: time for redesigning
clinical trials by involving only true bifurcation lesions and using
appropriate bifurcation classification. J Interv Cardiol. 2011
Aug;24(4):295-301
- Movahed MR. Is it time to consider the Movahed classification as the
preferred classification for coronary bifurcation lesions?
EuroIntervention. 2010 Jan;5(6):652;