Yosuke Nakatani

and 21 more

Introduction: Human atria comprise distinct epicardial layers, which can bypass endocardial layers and lead to downstream centrifugal propagation at the “epi-endo” connection. We sought to characterize anatomical substrates, electrophysiological properties, and ablation outcomes of “pseudo-focal” atrial tachycardias (ATs), defined as macroreentrant ATs mimicking focal ATs. Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed ATs showing centrifugal propagation with post-pacing intervals (PPIs) after entrainment pacing suggestive of a macroreentry. A total of 26 patients had pseudo-focal ATs consisting of 15 perimitral, 7 roof-dependent, and 5 cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent flutters. A low-voltage area was consistently found at the collision site and co-localized with epicardial layers like the: (1) coronary sinus-great cardiac vein bundle (22%); (2) vein of Marshall bundle (15%); (3) Bachmann bundle (22%); (4) septopulmonary bundle (15%); (5) fossa ovalis (7%); and (6) low right atrium (19%). The mean missing tachycardia cycle length (TCL) was 67 ± 29 ms (22%) on the endocardial activation map. PPI was 9 [0-15] ms and 10 [0-20] ms longer than TCL at the breakthrough site and the opposite site, respectively. While feasible in 25 pseudo-focal ATs (93%), termination was better achieved by blocking the anatomical isthmus than ablating the breakthrough site [24/26 (92%) vs. 1/6 (17%); p < 0.001]. Conclusion: Perimitral, roof-dependent, and CTI-dependent flutters with centrifugal propagation are favored by a low-voltage area located at well-identified epicardial bundles. Comprehensive entrainment pacing maneuvers are crucial to distinguish pseudo-focal ATs from true focal ATs. Blocking the anatomical isthmus is a better therapeutic option than ablating the breakthrough site.

Masateru Takigawa

and 15 more

Background: Although ablation energy (AE) and force-time integral (FTI) are well-known active predictors of lesion characteristics, these parameters do not reflect passive tissue reactions during ablation, which may instead be represented by drops in local impedance (LI). This study aimed to investigate if additional LI-data improves predicting lesion characteristics and steam-pops. Methods: RF applications at a range of powers (30W, 40W, and 50W), contact forces (8g, 15g, 25g, and 35g), and durations (10-180s) using perpendicular/parallel catheter orientations, were performed in excised porcine hearts (N=30). The correlation between AE, FTI and lesion characteristics was examined and the impact of LI (%LI-drop [%LID] defined by the ΔLI/Initial LI) was additionally assessed. Results: 375 lesions without steam-pops were examined. Ablation energy (W*s) and FTI (g*s) showed a positive correlation with lesion depth (ρ=0.824:P<0.0001 and ρ=0.708:P<0.0001), surface area (ρ=0.507:P<0.0001 and ρ=0.562:P<0.0001) and volume (ρ=0.807:P<0.0001 and ρ=0.685:P<0.0001). %LID also showed positive correlation individually with lesion depth (ρ=0.643:P<0.0001), surface area (ρ=0.547:P<0.0001) and volume (ρ=0.733, P<0.0001). However, the combined indices of AE*%LID and FTI*%LID provided significantly stronger correlation with lesion depth (ρ=0.834:P<0.0001 and ρ=0.809P<0.0001), surface area (ρ=0.529:P<0.0001 and ρ=0.656:P<0.0001) and volume (ρ=0.864:P<0.0001 and ρ=0.838:P<0.0001). This tendency was observed regardless of the catheter placement (parallel/perpendicular). AE (P=0.02) and %LID (P=0.002) independently remained as significant predictors to predict steam-pops (N=27). However, the AE*%LID did not increase the predictive power of steam-pops compared to the AE alone. Conclusion: LI, when combined with conventional parameters (AE and FTI), may provide stronger correlation with lesion characteristics.