Funding
Funding was not gained or sought for this study.
References
1. Cochrane. About us https://wwwcochraneorg/about-us. Accessed 1 July 2020.
2. Cochrane. Welcome Gynaecology and Fertility Group. https://cgfcochraneorg/welcome Accessed 1 July 2020.
3. Farquhar CM, Showell MG, Showell EAE, Beetham P, Baak N, Mourad S, et al. Clinical trial registration was not an indicator for low risk of bias. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2017;84:47-53.
4. Farquhar CM, Showell MG, Showell EAE, Beetham P, Baak N, Mourad S, et al. Clinical trial registration in fertility trials - a case for improvement? Hum Reprod. 2017;32(9):1827-34.
5. Wilkinson J, Roberts SA, Showell M, Brison DR, Vail A. No common denominator: a review of outcome measures in IVF RCTs. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(12):2714-22.
6. Cochrane Library. How Central is created 2020 [cited 2020 2 December]. Available from: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/central/central-creation
7. Alloo J, Vallath S, Del Mar C, Carter M, Thorning S, Clark J. Determining the gaps between Cochrane reviews and trials of effectiveness of interventions for acute respiratory infections: an audit. Systematic reviews. 2017;6(1):82.
8. Alliance JL. The James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnerships South Hampton: National Institue for HealthResearch Evaluation Trials and Coordinating Centre; 2018 [Accessed in August 2018]. Available from: https://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/priority-setting-partnerships/
9. Graham L, Illingworth BJG, Showell M, Vercoe M, Farquhar CM, Crosbie EJ, et al. Research priority setting in women’s health: a systematic review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2020;127(6):694-700.
10. Horne AW, Abokhrais IM, Hogg L, Saunders PTK. Top ten endometriosis research priorities in the UK and Ireland. The Lancet. 2017;389(10085):2191-2.
11. Macleod MR, Michie S, Roberts I, Dirnagl U, Chalmers I, Ioannidis JP, et al. Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):101-4.
12. Jenkins VA, Fallowfield LJ. For the Benefit of Others: Reasons Why Women with Breast Cancer Participate in RCTs. Breast care (Basel, Switzerland). 2015;10(2):88-93.
13. Minogue V, Cooke M, Donskoy AL, Vicary P, Wells B. Patient and public involvement in reducing health and care research waste. Research involvement and engagement. 2018;4:5.
14. Oliver DP, Benson JJ, Ulrich C, Washington KT, Rolbiecki AJ, White P, et al. Perceived Benefits and Burdens of Participation for Caregivers of Cancer Patients in Hospice Clinical Trials: A Pilot Study. Journal of pain and symptom management. 2020.
15. Ioannidis JPA, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, Khoury MJ, Macleod MR, Moher D, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet (London, England). 2014;383(9912):166-75.
16. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020). Cochrane, 2020. Available from wwwtrainingcochraneorg/handbook [Internet]. 2020.
17. Showell M, Stedman K, Farquhar C, Jordan-Cole V. Using the Cochrane Register of Studies to identify the evidence gaps in Fertility Cochrane systematic reviews. Virtual conference. University of Auckland2020.
18. Liu L, Tang Y, Baxter GD, Yin H, Tumilty S. Complementary and alternative medicine - practice, attitudes, and knowledge among healthcare professionals in New Zealand: an integrative review. BMC complementary medicine and therapies. 2021;21(1):63.