REFERENCES
1. Cilingiroglu M, Salinger M, Zhao D, Feldman T. Technique of temporary subcutaneous ”Figure-of-Eight” sutures to achieve hemostasis after removal of large-caliber femoral venous sheaths. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;78(1):155-60.
2. Morgan GJ, Waragai T, Eastaugh L, Chaturvedi RC, Lee KJ, Benson L. The fellows stitch: large caliber venous hemostasis in pediatric practice. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;80(1):79-82.
3. Zhou Y, Guo Z, Bai Y, Zhao X, Qin Y, Chen S, et al. Femoral venous hemostasis in children using the technique of ”figure-of-eight” sutures. Congenit Heart Dis. 2014;9(2):122-5.
4. Issa ZF, Amr BS. Venous hemostasis postcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation while under therapeutic levels of oral and intravenous anticoagulation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;44(2):97-104.
5. Aytemir K, Canpolat U, Yorgun H, Evranos B, Kaya EB, Sahiner ML, et al. Usefulness of ’figure-of-eight’ suture to achieve haemostasis after removal of 15-French calibre femoral venous sheath in patients undergoing cryoablation. Europace. 2016;18(10):1545-50.
6. Pracon R, Bangalore S, Henzel J, Cendrowska-Demkow I, Pregowska-Chwala B, Tarnowska A, et al. A randomized comparison of modified subcutaneous ”Z”-stitch versus manual compression to achieve hemostasis after large caliber femoral venous sheath removal. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91(1):105-12.
7. Lakshmanadoss U, Wong WS, Kutinsky I, Khalid MR, Williamson B, Haines DE. Figure-of-eight suture for venous hemostasis in fully anticoagulated patients after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017;17(5):134-9.
8. Payne J, Bickel T, Gautam S. Figure-of-eight sutures for hemostasis result in shorter lab recovery time after ablation for atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018.
9. Okada M, Inoue K, Tanaka K, Ninomiya Y, Hirao Y, Oka T, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Figure-of-Eight Suture for Hemostasis After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. Circ J. 2018;82(4):956-64.
10. Jensen CJ, Schnur M, Lask S, Attanasio P, Gotzmann M, Kara K, et al. Feasibility of the Figure-of-8-Suture as Venous Closure in Interventional Electrophysiology: One Strategy for All? Int J Med Sci. 2020;17(7):965-9.
11. Akkaya E, Berkowitsch A, Zaltsberg S, Deubner N, Greiss H, Hain A, et al. Safety and feasibility of percutaneous skin closure using purse-string suture compared with compression bandage after pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017;28(9):1048-57.
12. Kumar V, Wish M, Venkataraman G, Bliden K, Jindal M, Strickberger A. A randomized comparison of manual pressure versus figure-of-eight suture for hemostasis after cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(12):2806-10.
13. Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen SA, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Europace. 2012;14(4):528-606.
14. Barbetta I, van den Berg JC. Access and hemostasis: femoral and popliteal approaches and closure devices-why, what, when, and how? Semin Intervent Radiol. 2014;31(4):353-60.
15. Dangas G, Mehran R, Kokolis S, Feldman D, Satler LF, Pichard AD, et al. Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(3):638-41.
16. Geis NA, Pleger ST, Chorianopoulos E, Muller OJ, Katus HA, Bekeredjian R. Feasibility and clinical benefit of a suture-mediated closure device for femoral vein access after percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair. EuroIntervention. 2015;10(11):1346-53.
17. Mahadevan VS, Jimeno S, Benson LN, McLaughlin PR, Horlick EM. Pre-closure of femoral venous access sites used for large-sized sheath insertion with the Perclose device in adults undergoing cardiac intervention. Heart. 2008;94(5):571-2.
18. Maraj I, Budzikowski AS, Ali W, Mitre CA, Kassotis J. Use of vascular closure device is safe and effective in electrophysiological procedures. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;43(2):193-5.
19. Shaw JA, Dewire E, Nugent A, Eisenhauer AC. Use of suture-mediated vascular closure devices for the management of femoral vein access after transcatheter procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;63(4):439-43.
20. Hamid T, Choudhury TR, Clarke B, Mahadevan VS. Pre-closure of Large-Sized Arterial Access Sites in Adults Undergoing Transcatheter Structural Interventions. Cardiol Ther. 2015;4(1):59-63.
21. Mylonas I, Sakata Y, Salinger M, Sanborn TA, Feldman T. The use of percutaneous suture-mediated closure for the management of 14 French femoral venous access. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006;18(7):299-302.
22. Hermiller JB, Leimbach W, Gammon R, Karas SP, Whitbourn RJ, Wong SC, et al. A prospective, randomized, pivotal trial of a novel extravascular collagen-based closure device compared to manual compression in diagnostic and interventional patients. J Invasive Cardiol. 2015;27(3):129-36.
23. Boer C, Meesters MI, Veerhoek D, Vonk ABA. Anticoagulant and side-effects of protamine in cardiac surgery: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(5):914-27.