References
1. Rajaneesh A, Zhao Y, Chai GB, et al. Flexural fatigue life prediction of CFRP-Nomex honeycomb sandwich beams. Compos Struct 2018; 192: 225–231.
2. Wu X, Yu H, Guo L, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of static and fatigue behaviors of composites honeycomb sandwich structure.Compos Struct 2019; 213: 165–172.
3. Hajmohammad MH, Kolahchi R, Zarei MS, et al. Dynamic response of auxetic honeycomb plates integrated with agglomerated CNT-reinforced face sheets subjected to blast load based on visco-sinusoidal theory.Int J Mech Sci 2019; 153–154: 391–401.
4. Yang FP, Lin QY, Jiang JJ. Experimental study on fatigue failure and damage of sandwich structure with PMI foam core. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 2015; 38: 456–465.
5. Strek T, Jopek H, Nienartowicz M. Dynamic response of sandwich panels with auxetic cores. Phys Status Solidi Basic Res 2015; 252: 1540–1550.
6. Pehlivan L, Baykasoğlu C. An experimental study on the compressive response of CFRP honeycombs with various cell configurations.Compos Part B Eng 2019; 162: 653–661.
7. Akpinar S, Aydin MD, Temiz Ş, et al. 3-D non-linear stress analysis on the adhesively bonded T-joints with embedded supports. Compos Part B Eng 2013; 53: 314–323.
8. Belouettar S, Abbadi A, Azari Z, et al. Experimental investigation of static and fatigue behaviour of composites honeycomb materials using four point bending tests. Compos Struct 2009; 87: 265–273.
9. Wu Y, Liu Q, Fu J, et al. Dynamic crash responses of bio-inspired aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures with CFRP panels. Compos Part B Eng 2017; 121: 122–133.
10. Quispitupa A, Berggreen C, Carlsson LA. Face/core interface fracture characterization of mixed mode bending sandwich specimens. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 2011; 34: 839–853.
11. Nouri H, Lubineau G, Traudes D. An experimental investigation of the effect of shear-induced diffuse damage on transverse cracking in carbon-fiber reinforced laminates. Compos Struct 2013; 106: 529–536.
12. Zhang W, Zhou Z, Zheng P, et al. The fatigue damage mesomodel for fiber-reinforced polymer composite lamina. J Reinf Plast Compos2014; 33: 1783–1793.
13. Kolahchi R, Cheraghbak A. Agglomeration effects on the dynamic buckling of viscoelastic microplates reinforced with SWCNTs using Bolotin method. Nonlinear Dyn 2017; 90: 479–492.
14. Motezaker M, Jamali M, Kolahchi R. Application of differential cubature method for nonlocal vibration, buckling and bending response of annular nanoplates integrated by piezoelectric layers based on surface-higher order nonlocal-piezoelasticity theory. J Comput Appl Math 2020; 369: 112625.
15. Wang Z, Li Z, Zhou W, et al. On the influence of structural defects for honeycomb structure. Compos Part B Eng 2018; 142: 183–192.
16. Jen YM, Ko CW, Lin H Bin. Effect of the amount of adhesive on the bending fatigue strength of adhesively bonded aluminum honeycomb sandwich beams. Int J Fatigue 2009; 31: 455–462.
17. Subhani T. Mechanical Performance of Honeycomb Sandwich Structures Using Three-Point Bend Test. 2019; 9: 3955–3958.
18. Jen YM, Chang LY. Effect of thickness of face sheet on the bending fatigue strength of aluminum honeycomb sandwich beams. Eng Fail Anal 2009; 16: 1282–1293.
19. Abbadi A, Tixier C, Gilgert J, et al. Experimental study on the fatigue behaviour of honeycomb sandwich panels with artificial defects.Compos Struct 2015; 120: 394–405.
20. Schubel PM, Luo JJ, Daniel IM. Impact and post impact behavior of composite sandwich panels. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2007; 38: 1051–1057.
21. Belingardi G, Martella P, Peroni L. Fatigue analysis of honeycomb-composite sandwich beams. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2007; 38: 1183–1191.
22. Shi SS, Sun Z, Hu XZ, et al. Carbon-fiber and aluminum-honeycomb sandwich composites with and without Kevlar-fiber interfacial toughening. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2014; 67: 102–110.
23. Akatay A, Bora MÖ, Çoban O, et al. The influence of low velocity repeated impacts on residual compressive properties of honeycomb sandwich structures. Compos Struct 2015; 125: 425–433.
24. Galehdari SA, Kadkhodayan M, Hadidi-Moud S. Low velocity impact and quasi-static in-plane loading on a graded honeycomb structure; experimental, analytical and numerical study. Aerosp Sci Technol2015; 47: 425–433.
25. Baba BO. Curved sandwich composites with layer-wise graded cores under impact loads. Compos Struct 2017; 159: 1–11.
26. He W, Yao L, Meng X, et al. Effect of structural parameters on low-velocity impact behavior of aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures with CFRP face sheets. Thin-Walled Struct 2019; 137: 411–432.
27. Longbiao L. A hysteresis energy dissipation based model for multiple loading damage in continuous fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites.Compos Part B Eng 2019; 162: 259–273.
28. Menard KP. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis: A Pratical Introduction . CRC Press, 2008.
29. De Silva CW. Dynamic testing and seismic qualification practice . Carnegie-Mellon Univ, 1983.
30. Topkaya T, Solmaz MY. Investigation of low velocity impact behaviors of honeycomb sandwich composites. J Mech Sci Technol 2018; 32: 3161–3167.
31. Suzuki T, Mahfuz H, Takanashi M. A new stiffness degradation model for fatigue life prediction of GFRPs under random loading. Int J Fatigue 2019; 119: 220–228.
32. Idriss M, El Mahi A, Assarar M, et al. Damping analysis in cyclic fatigue loading of sandwich beams with debonding. Compos Part B Eng 2013; 44: 597–603.