REFERENCES

1. Tan HE, Santa Maria PL, Eikelboom RH, Anandacoomaraswamy KS, Atlas MD. Type I Tympanoplasty Meta-Analysis: A Single Variable Analysis.Otol Neurotol . 2016;37:838-846.
2. Hellstrom S, Salen B, Stenfors LE. Absorbable gelatin sponge (Gelfoam) in otosurgery: one cause of undesirable postoperative results?Acta Otolaryngol . 1983;96:269-275.
3. Park SY, Lee HJ, Shim MJ, Kim DK, Suh BD, Park SN. Swing-Door Overlay Tympanoplasty: Surgical Technique and Outcomes. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol . 2018;11:186-191.
4. Gisselsson L. Improvement of hearing by surgical repair of the drum and ossicular chain; report of five cases operated on by the method of Zollner and Wullstein. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl . 1954;118:100-108.
5. McGhee MA, Dornhoffer JL. The effect of gelfilm in the prevention of fibrosis in the middle ear of the animal model. Am J Otol . 1999;20:712-716.
6. Angeli S, Connell S, Gibson B, Ozdek A, McElveen JT, Jr., Van De Water TR. Injectable form of cross-linked hyaluronan is effective for middle ear wound healing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol . 2007;116:667-673.
7. Joseph RB. The effect of absorbable gelatin sponge preparations and other agents on scar formation in the dog’s middle ear. An experimental histopathologic study. Laryngoscope . 1962;72:1528-1548.
8. Laurent C, Hellstrom S, Stenfors LE. Hyaluronic acid reduces connective tissue formation in middle ears filled with absorbable gelatin sponge: an experimental study. Am J Otolaryngol . 1986;7:181-186.
9. Liening DA, Lundy L, Silberberg B, Finstuen K. A comparison of the biocompatibility of three absorbable hemostatic agents in the rat middle ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1997;116:454-457.
10. Lipan MJ, Alava I, Abi-Hachem R, Vernon S, Van De Water TR, Angeli SI. Middle ear packing: comparison of materials in an animal model of mucosal trauma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 2011;144:763-769.
11. Dogru S, Haholu A, Gungor A, et al. Histologic analysis of the effects of three different support materials within rat middle ear.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 2009;140:177-182.
12. Perez E, Hachem RA, Carlton D, et al. Comparison of packing material in an animal model of middle ear trauma. Am J Otolaryngol . 2016;37:323-329.
13. Deniz B, Oguzhan KR, Erdem O, Hasan S, Fuat YY, Muge O. The effects of different packing materials on healing and hearing after trauma to middle ear mucosa, an experimental study in rats. Am J Otolaryngol . 2019;40:347-352.
14. Shen Y, Teh BM, Friedland PL, Eikelboom RH, Atlas MD. To pack or not to pack? A contemporary review of middle ear packing agents.Laryngoscope . 2011;121:1040-1048.
15. Goncalves S, Chiossone-Kerdel JA, Bianco AS, Ercolino JM, Hernandez-Rojas J. Effect of absorbable gelatin sponge in the middle ear: in vitro and in vivo animal model. Acta Otolaryngol . 2015;135:14-25.
16. Smith J, Gardner E, Dornhoffer JL. Hearing results with a hydroxylapatite/titanium bell partial ossicular replacement prosthesis.Laryngoscope . 2002;112:1796-1799.
17. Kong JS, Jeong CY, Shim MJ, Kim WJ, Yeo SW, Park SN. Comparative study of new autologous material, bone-cartilage composite graft, for ossiculoplasty with Polycel(®) and Titanium. Clin Otolaryngol . 2018;43:434-439.
18. Doyle-Kelly W. Behaviour of absorbable gelatine sponge in the animal middle ear. J Laryngol Otol . 1961;75:152-166.
19. Withers BT, Nail BM, Jr., Alford BR. The effects of burying epithelium in the middle ear of animals: clinical implications.Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol . 1960;64:863-871.
20. Rizer FM. Overlay versus underlay tympanoplasty. Part I: historical review of the literature. Laryngoscope . 1997;107:1-25.
21. Yuasa R, Saijo S, Tomioka Y, et al. Office closure of eardrum perforation with fibrin glue. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (Tokyo) . 1989;61:1117-1122.
22. Sakagami M, Yuasa R, Yuasa Y. Simple underlay myringoplasty. J Laryngol Otol . 2007;121:840-844.
23. Eavey RD. Inlay tympanoplasty: cartilage butterfly technique.Laryngoscope . 1998;108:657-661.
24. Jumaily M, Franco J, Gallogly JA, et al. Butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty outcomes: A single-institution experience and literature review. Am J Otolaryngol . 2018;39:396-400.
25. Kim MB, Park JA, Suh MJ, Song CI. Comparison of clinical outcomes between butterfly inlay cartilage tympanoplasty and conventional underlay cartilage tympanoplasty. Auris Nasus Larynx . 2019;46:167-171.