REFERENCES
1. Tan HE, Santa Maria PL, Eikelboom RH, Anandacoomaraswamy KS, Atlas
MD. Type I Tympanoplasty Meta-Analysis: A Single Variable Analysis.Otol Neurotol . 2016;37:838-846.
2. Hellstrom S, Salen B, Stenfors LE. Absorbable gelatin sponge
(Gelfoam) in otosurgery: one cause of undesirable postoperative results?Acta Otolaryngol . 1983;96:269-275.
3. Park SY, Lee HJ, Shim MJ, Kim DK, Suh BD, Park SN. Swing-Door Overlay
Tympanoplasty: Surgical Technique and Outcomes. Clin Exp
Otorhinolaryngol . 2018;11:186-191.
4. Gisselsson L. Improvement of hearing by surgical repair of the drum
and ossicular chain; report of five cases operated on by the method of
Zollner and Wullstein. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl . 1954;118:100-108.
5. McGhee MA, Dornhoffer JL. The effect of gelfilm in the prevention of
fibrosis in the middle ear of the animal model. Am J Otol .
1999;20:712-716.
6. Angeli S, Connell S, Gibson B, Ozdek A, McElveen JT, Jr., Van De
Water TR. Injectable form of cross-linked hyaluronan is effective for
middle ear wound healing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol .
2007;116:667-673.
7. Joseph RB. The effect of absorbable gelatin sponge preparations and
other agents on scar formation in the dog’s middle ear. An experimental
histopathologic study. Laryngoscope . 1962;72:1528-1548.
8. Laurent C, Hellstrom S, Stenfors LE. Hyaluronic acid reduces
connective tissue formation in middle ears filled with absorbable
gelatin sponge: an experimental study. Am J Otolaryngol .
1986;7:181-186.
9. Liening DA, Lundy L, Silberberg B, Finstuen K. A comparison of the
biocompatibility of three absorbable hemostatic agents in the rat middle
ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1997;116:454-457.
10. Lipan MJ, Alava I, Abi-Hachem R, Vernon S, Van De Water TR, Angeli
SI. Middle ear packing: comparison of materials in an animal model of
mucosal trauma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 2011;144:763-769.
11. Dogru S, Haholu A, Gungor A, et al. Histologic analysis of the
effects of three different support materials within rat middle ear.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 2009;140:177-182.
12. Perez E, Hachem RA, Carlton D, et al. Comparison of packing material
in an animal model of middle ear trauma. Am J Otolaryngol .
2016;37:323-329.
13. Deniz B, Oguzhan KR, Erdem O, Hasan S, Fuat YY, Muge O. The effects
of different packing materials on healing and hearing after trauma to
middle ear mucosa, an experimental study in rats. Am J
Otolaryngol . 2019;40:347-352.
14. Shen Y, Teh BM, Friedland PL, Eikelboom RH, Atlas MD. To pack or not
to pack? A contemporary review of middle ear packing agents.Laryngoscope . 2011;121:1040-1048.
15. Goncalves S, Chiossone-Kerdel JA, Bianco AS, Ercolino JM,
Hernandez-Rojas J. Effect of absorbable gelatin sponge in the middle
ear: in vitro and in vivo animal model. Acta Otolaryngol .
2015;135:14-25.
16. Smith J, Gardner E, Dornhoffer JL. Hearing results with a
hydroxylapatite/titanium bell partial ossicular replacement prosthesis.Laryngoscope . 2002;112:1796-1799.
17. Kong JS, Jeong CY, Shim MJ, Kim WJ, Yeo SW, Park SN. Comparative
study of new autologous material, bone-cartilage composite graft, for
ossiculoplasty with Polycel(®) and Titanium. Clin Otolaryngol .
2018;43:434-439.
18. Doyle-Kelly W. Behaviour of absorbable gelatine sponge in the animal
middle ear. J Laryngol Otol . 1961;75:152-166.
19. Withers BT, Nail BM, Jr., Alford BR. The effects of burying
epithelium in the middle ear of animals: clinical implications.Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol . 1960;64:863-871.
20. Rizer FM. Overlay versus underlay tympanoplasty. Part I: historical
review of the literature. Laryngoscope . 1997;107:1-25.
21. Yuasa R, Saijo S, Tomioka Y, et al. Office closure of eardrum
perforation with fibrin glue. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (Tokyo) .
1989;61:1117-1122.
22. Sakagami M, Yuasa R, Yuasa Y. Simple underlay myringoplasty. J
Laryngol Otol . 2007;121:840-844.
23. Eavey RD. Inlay tympanoplasty: cartilage butterfly technique.Laryngoscope . 1998;108:657-661.
24. Jumaily M, Franco J, Gallogly JA, et al. Butterfly cartilage
tympanoplasty outcomes: A single-institution experience and literature
review. Am J Otolaryngol . 2018;39:396-400.
25. Kim MB, Park JA, Suh MJ, Song CI. Comparison of clinical outcomes
between butterfly inlay cartilage tympanoplasty and conventional
underlay cartilage tympanoplasty. Auris Nasus Larynx .
2019;46:167-171.