Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
English Editing: This study English editing by
EnagoTM.
Ethics Statement: This study was reviewed and approved by the
institutional ethical committee of MacKay Memorial Hospital
(18MMHIS155e). The date of approval is 26th November,
2018.
Funding: This study not received any funding.
References
1. Hesselman S; H.U.; Råssjö EB; Schytt E; Löfgren M; Jonsson M.
Abdominal adhesions in gynaecologic surgery after caesarean section: a
longitudinal population-based register study. BJOG. 2018, 125, 597-603.
2. KJ. Incidence of adhesions at repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 2007, 196, e31-2.
3. Myers SA; B.T. Incidence of significant adhesions at repeat cesarean
section and the relationship to method of prior peritoneal closure. J
Reprod Med. 2005, 50, 659-62.
4. Lyell DJ; C.A.; Hu E. Daniels K. Peritoneal closure at primary
cesarean delivery and adhesions. Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 106, 275-80.
5. Tulandi T.; A.M.; Zarei A.; Miner L.; Sikirica V. Adhesion
development and morbidity after repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 2009, 201, 56.e1-6.
6. Nuamah M.A.; B.J.; Öry A.V.; Damale N.; Klipstein-Grobusch K.; Rijken
M.J. Prevalence of adhesions and associated postoperative complications
after cesarean section in Ghana: a prospective cohort study. Reprod
Health. 2017, 14, 143.
7. Rossouw J.N.; H.D.; Harvey J. Time between skin incision and delivery
during cesarean. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013, 121, 82-5.
8. Soltan M.H.; A.N.L.; Khashoggi T.; Chowdhury N.; Kangave D.; Adelusi
B. Sequelae of repeat cesarean sections. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1996,
52, 127-32.
9. Uygur D.; G.O.; Kelekci S.; Ozturk A.; Ugur M.; Mungan T. Multiple
repeat caesarean section: is it safe? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.
2005, 119, 171-5.
10. Morales K.J.; G.M.; Bates G.W. Jr. Postcesarean delivery adhesions
associated with delayed delivery of infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007,
196, 461.e1-6.
11. Greenberg M.B.; D.K.; Blumenfeld Y.J.; Caughey A.B.; Lyell D.J. Do
adhesions at repeat cesarean delay delivery of the newborn? Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 2011, 205, 380.e1-5.
12. Makoha F.W.; F.H.; Fathuddien M.A; Roomi F.; Ghabra T. Multiple
cesarean section morbidity. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004, 87, 227-32.
13. Ray N.F.; D.W.Thamer M.; Henderson S.C.; Perry S. Abdominal
adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in
1994. J Am Coll Surg. 1998, 186, 1-9.
14. Adhesion Barrier Official Site (https://www.seprafilm.us/).
Seprafilm®. 2020.
15. Absorbable Adhesion Barrier Official (http://www.ethicon.com/).
GYNECARE INTERCEED®. 2020.
16. Fushiki H.; I.T.; Kobayashi H.; Yoshimoto H. Efficacy of Seprafilm
as an adhesion prevention barrier in cesarean sections. Obstet Gynecol
Treat. 2005, 91, 557–61.
17. Fushiki H.; Y.H.; Nakajima A.Usefulness of Seprafim during a
caesarean section. Ob Gyn Surgery. 2002, 99-105.
18. Kim T.H.; K.J.; Lee H.H.; Nam K.H.; Lee K.H.; Lee J.J. Prevention of
vesicouterine adhesion after cesarean with Interceed. Korean Society of
Fetal Medicine, 10th Annual Congress of Perinatal Society of Australia
& New Zealand. 2006.
19. Chapa H.O.; V.G.; Vanduyne C.P.; Antonetti A.G.; Sandate J.P.;
Silver L. Peritoneal adhesion prevention at cesarean section: an
analysis of the effectiveness of an absorbable adhesion barrier. J.
Reprod. Med. 2011, 56, 103-109.
20. Chapa H.; V.G. Maternal morbidity at first repeat cesarean: a
sub-analysis of Interceed barrier placed at primary cesarean section.
Open Access Surgery. 2013, 6, 7-12.
21. Plante B, S.S.; Elliott J.O. Adhesion Assessment at First Repeat
Caesarean Section With or Without Prior Adhesion Barrier Use . J Obstet
Gynaecol Can. 2016, 38, 795-803.
22. Daniel G. KIEFER; J.C.M.; Jarrett SANTORELLI. Effectiveness and
short-term safety of modified sodium hyaluronic
acid-carboxymethylcellulose at cesarean delivery: a randomized trial. Am
J Obstet Gynecol. 2016, 214, 373.e1–373.e12.
23. Edwards R.K.; I.M.; Gerkin R.D.; Bodea-Braescu A.V.; Lin M.G.
Carboxymethylcellulose Adhesion Barrier Placement at Primary Cesarean
Delivery and Outcomes at Repeat Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014,
123, 923-8.
24. Gaspar-Oishi M; A.T. Cesarean Delivery Times and Adhesion Severity
Associated With Prior Placement of a Sodium Hyaluronate-Carboxycellulose
Barrier. Obstet Gynecol. 2014, 124, 679-83.
25. Shi Z.; M.L.; Yang Y. Adhesion formation after previous caesarean
section—a meta-analysis and systematic review. BJOG. 2011, 118,
410-22.
26. Komoto Y.; S.K.; Shimizu T. Prospective study of non-closure or
closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery in 124 women: Impact of
prior peritoneal closure at primary cesarean on the interval time
between first cesarean section and the next pregnancy and significant
adhesion at second cesarean. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2006, 32, 396-402.
27. Lyell D.J.; C.A.; Hu E.; Blumenfeld Y.; El-Sayed Y.Y.; Daniels K.
Rectus muscle and visceral peritoneum closure at cesarean delivery and
intraabdominal adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012, 206, 515.e1-5.
28. Anthony A. Bamigboye; G.J.H. Closure versus non-closure of the
peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2014, 11, 1–79.
29. Kapustian V.; A.E.; Gdalevich M.; Shenhav S.; Lavie O.; Gemer O.
Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on
adhesions: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012,
206, 56.e1-4.
30. Cheong Y.C.; P.G.; Metwally M.; Peacock J.L.; T.C. To close or not
to close? A systematic review and a meta-analysis of peritoneal
non-closure and adhesion formation after caesarean section. Eur J Obstet
Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009, 147, 3-8.
31. Awoniyi O. Awonuga; N.M.F.; Ghassan M. Saed; Michael P. Diamond.
Postoperative Adhesion Development Following Cesarean and Open
Intra-Abdominal Gynecological Operations: A Review. 2011, 12,
1166–1185.
32. Asako Nagashima; S.S. Chemical Inflammation Associated With Adhesion
Barrier Following Cesarean Section. Journal of Clinical Gynecology and
Obstetrics. 2018, 7, 20-22.
33. Wagatsuma S.; Y.T.; Sakurada S.; Matsumoto H.; Hoshiai T. A case of
chemical peritonitis induced by an anti adhesion bioresorbable membrane
(Seprafilm®) (in Japanese). Obstet Gynecol Ptactice. 2014, 63, 133-137.
34. Ghellai A.M.; S.A.; Lynch D.J.; Skinner K.C.; Colt M.J.; Becker J.M.
Role of a hyaluronate-based membrane in the prevention of
peritonitis-induced adhesions. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000, 4, 310-5.
35. Tzianabos A.O.; C.R.; Gershkovich J. Effect of surgical adhesion
reduction devices on the propagation of experimental intra-abdominal
infection. Arch Surg. 1999, 134, 1254-9.
36. Lee K.S.; H.J. Short-Term Postoperative Outcomes between 4%
Icodextrin Solution and Hyaluronic Acid- Carboxymethyl Cellulose
Membrane during Emergency Cesarean Section. J Clin Med. 2019, 8, E1249.
37. Kawakita T.; L.H. Surgical site infections after cesarean delivery:
epidemiology, prevention and treatment. Matern Health Neonatol
Perinatol. 2017, 3.