Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel technique for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation management. Notably, asystole episodes of varying durations have been observed during electroporation, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Objective: This study hypothesizes that asystole during PFA is attributable to the activation of parasympathetic ganglia on the left atrium’s surface. Methods: We conducted a study with 24 patients (67% male, 62.8 ± 11.0 years, BMI: 25.3 ± 5.6) suffering from paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The order of pulmonary veins chosen for electroporation was randomized to avoid cumulative electroporation effects. PFA was performed and the duration of cardiac pauses post-electroporation was recorded for each application. To examine the impact of electroporation on the parasympathetic nervous system, transjugular vagal stimulation (TJVS) was performed from the right internal jugular before and after isolation of each vein, during sinus rhythm and atrial pacing. Continuous data were analyzed with Student’s t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate; nominal data were evaluated using chi-square or Fisher exact tests. Results: Pre-PFA TJVS induced sinus pauses of 10.1 ± 2.74 seconds. A sinus block of over 3 seconds was present in 23 out of 24 patients. Post-PFA, the Right Superior Pulmonary Vein (RSPV) showed the highest decrease of TJVS-induced sinus pauses (RSPV: before 8.41 ± 4.53 vs after 3.27 ± 3.53 sec, p<0.001, RIPV: before 6.76 ± 4.54 sec vs. 6.89 ± 5.07 sec, p=0.90; LSPV: before 6.76 ± 5.25 sec vs. after 6.93 ± 4.29 sec, p=0.61; LIPV: before 7.80 ± 4.06 sec vs. after 7.88 ± 3.84 sec, p=0.91). Notably, sinus blocks over 3 seconds decreased significantly after RSPV ablation (19 before PFA, 10 after PFA, p<0.01), with less dramatic changes in other veins (RIPV: before 19, after 16, p=0.33; LSPV: before 14, after 19, p=0.11; LIPV: before 21, after 21, p=1.00). RSPV PFA also had the strongest impact on TJVS-induced AV block duration compared to the remaining veins (RSPV: before 6.49 ± 3.48 vs after 4.07 ± 3.27 sec, p<0.01, RIPV: before 6.00 ± 3.29 sec vs. 4.58 ± 3.99 sec, p=0.08; LSPV: before 5.15 ± 3.94 sec vs. after 5.14 ± 3.48 sec, p=0.93; LIPV: before 6.06 ± 3.98 sec vs. after 5.83 ± 3.44 sec, p=0.38). The incidence of AV blocks over 3 seconds was markedly reduced post-RSPV and post RIPV ablation (RSPV: before:19 vs. after: 14, p=0.11, RIPV: before:19 vs. after: 14, p=0.11), with minor changes in other veins (LSPV: before 14, after 16, p=0.55; LIPV: before 17, after 18, p=0.77). Conclusions: PFA applications during pulmonary vein isolation have acute effect on the autonomic nervous system, as evidenced by the decrease in TJVS-induced sinus and atrioventricular block at the level of the right superior pulmonary vein. PFA-induced pauses are more frequent during applications on the LSPV, and less frequent when prior isolation of the RSPV has been performed, suggesting a vagally-mediated mechanism involving the right superior and/or right posterior ganglionated plexi.

Yosuke Nakatani

and 21 more

Introduction: Human atria comprise distinct epicardial layers, which can bypass endocardial layers and lead to downstream centrifugal propagation at the “epi-endo” connection. We sought to characterize anatomical substrates, electrophysiological properties, and ablation outcomes of “pseudo-focal” atrial tachycardias (ATs), defined as macroreentrant ATs mimicking focal ATs. Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed ATs showing centrifugal propagation with post-pacing intervals (PPIs) after entrainment pacing suggestive of a macroreentry. A total of 26 patients had pseudo-focal ATs consisting of 15 perimitral, 7 roof-dependent, and 5 cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent flutters. A low-voltage area was consistently found at the collision site and co-localized with epicardial layers like the: (1) coronary sinus-great cardiac vein bundle (22%); (2) vein of Marshall bundle (15%); (3) Bachmann bundle (22%); (4) septopulmonary bundle (15%); (5) fossa ovalis (7%); and (6) low right atrium (19%). The mean missing tachycardia cycle length (TCL) was 67 ± 29 ms (22%) on the endocardial activation map. PPI was 9 [0-15] ms and 10 [0-20] ms longer than TCL at the breakthrough site and the opposite site, respectively. While feasible in 25 pseudo-focal ATs (93%), termination was better achieved by blocking the anatomical isthmus than ablating the breakthrough site [24/26 (92%) vs. 1/6 (17%); p < 0.001]. Conclusion: Perimitral, roof-dependent, and CTI-dependent flutters with centrifugal propagation are favored by a low-voltage area located at well-identified epicardial bundles. Comprehensive entrainment pacing maneuvers are crucial to distinguish pseudo-focal ATs from true focal ATs. Blocking the anatomical isthmus is a better therapeutic option than ablating the breakthrough site.

Yosuke Nakatani

and 23 more

Introduction: Ultra-high-density mapping for ventricular tachycardia (VT) is increasingly used. However, manual annotation of local abnormal ventricular activities (LAVAs) is challenging in this setting. Therefore, we assessed the accuracy of the automatic annotation of LAVAs with the Lumipoint algorithm of the Rhythmia system (Boston Scientific). Methods and Results: One hundred consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation of scar-related VT were studied. Areas with LAVAs and ablation sites were manually annotated during the procedure and compared with automatically annotated areas using the Lumipoint features for detecting late potentials (LP), fragmented potentials (FP), and double potentials (DP). The accuracy of each automatic annotation feature was assessed by re-evaluating local potentials within automatically annotated areas. Automatically annotated areas matched with manually annotated areas in 64 cases (64%), identified an area with LAVAs missed during manual annotation in 15 cases (15%), and did not highlight areas identified with manual annotation in 18 cases (18%). Automatic FP annotation accurately detected LAVAs regardless of the cardiac rhythm or scar location; automatic LP annotation accurately detected LAVAs in sinus rhythm, but was affected by the scar location during ventricular pacing; automatic DP annotation was not affected by the mapping rhythm, but its accuracy was suboptimal when the scar was located on the right ventricle or epicardium. Conclusion: The Lumipoint algorithm was as/more accurate than manual annotation in 79% of patients. FP annotation detected LAVAs most accurately regardless of mapping rhythm and scar location. The accuracy of LP and DP annotations varied depending on mapping rhythm or scar location.

Philipp Krisai

and 19 more