Fig. 8.  - The SEEV Framework Summary for a qualified pilot, showing an optimised form of the earlier presented model abstraction (Wickens, Christopher   D, 2003).
TABLE VII
- FCM TEST RUNS WITH BACKLINKS (BL) BETWEEN CONCEPTS
 
FCM         Activation Function    Slope
BLTest1    Sigmoid                        1
Offset    Epsilon     Steps     1st     2nd     3rd     4th
1            0.001        8           2        1         16       6
BLTest2    Sigmoid
1
1
0.001        8           7        1         16       6
BLTest3    Sigmoid
2
1
0.001        17         2        1         16       6
 
TABLE VIII
- OUTPUTS FROM AUTOGENERATED WEIGHT INITIALISATION.
 
FCM
Activation
Slope
Offset
Epsilon
Steps
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
LB-A-001
Sigmoid
2
1
0.001
8
2
6
1
9
LB-A-002
Sigmoid
2
1
0.001
7
9
5
3
1
LB-A-003
Sigmoid
2
1
0.001
8
6
1
10
2
LB-A-004
Sigmoid
2
1
0.001
7
12
2
13
14
LB-A-005
Sigmoid
2
1
0.001
12
16
12
9
2
LB-A-006
Sigmoid
2
1
0.001
9
1
13
15
14
LB-A-007
Sigmoid
2
1
0.001
100
7
1
9
3
LB-A-008
Sigmoid
2
1
0.001
7
16
12
10
8
 
TABLE IX
- DISTILLED  FCM OUTPUTS
 
FCM                               
Convergence Steps
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Test Output(Mode)
5
5
1
7
2
LB Test Output(Mode)
7
16
1
10
2
LB-A(Mode)
8
2
1
16
6