Stone expulsion time (SET)
Compared to placebo only TADplusSILO, NIF-S, AL, SILO, TAD and TAM were
more effective (Figure 3). Standard Mean differences (SMD) for stone
expulsion time compared to placebo were best for TADplusSILO (SMD -2.8
(-4.3, -1.2) followed by NIF-S (SMD -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8) and SILO (SMD -1.4
(-2.1, -0.6) (Supplementary Table 3). SUCRA values obtained for time to
stone expulsion estimate revealed highest values for TADplusSILO and
least for NAF-S. (Supplementary Table 4 and Supplementary figure 4).
Global test for inconsistency and node splitting approach did not reveal
inconsistency in any comparisons. Loop specific approach revealed
inconsistency in AL-C-NIF and SILO-TADplusSILO-TAM loops (Supplementary
figure 5).