Fontenot, 2005 |
33.4 ± 3.7 vs. 34.4 ± 4.2 |
NR |
NR |
0/48
(0%) vs 0/50 (0%) |
27/50 (56%) vs. 31/48 (62%) |
NR |
Ehrenberg, 2006 |
38.7 ± 1.7 vs 38.7 ± 1.7 |
NR |
NR |
NR |
22/101 (21.7%) vs 25/95 (26.3%) |
NR |
Darngawn, 2012 |
35.4 ± 3.6 vs 35.6 ±3.8 |
11/75 (14.7%) vs
14/75 (18.7%) |
NR |
NR |
31/75 (41.3%) vs 32/75 (42.7%) |
NR |
Maia, 2014 |
36.8±3.0 vs 37.2±4.9 |
NR |
NR |
0/56 (0%) vs
0/56 (0%) |
36/56 (64.3%) vs 33/56 (58.9%) |
1/56 (1.8%) vs 2/56
(3.6%) |
Kashanian, 2016 |
36.1±1.2 vs 36.2±1.3 |
13/79 (16.4%) vs
17/91 (16.5%) |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
Rimal, 2017 |
37.1±3.6 vs 37.4±4.1 |
NR |
1/30 (8.3%) vs 1/30
(8.3%) |
NR |
16/30 (53.3%) vs 12/30 (40%) |
1/30 (8.3%) vs 1/30
(8.3%) |
Vigil-De Gracia, 2017 |
36.1±3.1 vs 36.2±2.8 |
NR |
NR |
NR |
96/141 (68.0%) vs 92/143 (64.3%) |
1/141 (0.7%) vs 2/143
(1.3%) |
Vigil-De Gracia, 2018 |
36.3±4.9 vs 36.3±3.6 |
NR |
14/558
(2.5%) vs 18/555 (3.2%) |
NR |
343/558 (61.4%) vs 337/555 (61.0%) |
13/558 (2.3%) vs 11/555 (2.0%) |
Total or Standard Mean: |
36.3 vs 36.5 |
24/154 (15.6%) vs
31/166 (18.7%) |
15/588 (2.6%) vs 19/585 (3.2%) |
0/104 (0%) vs
0/106 (0%) |
571/1011 (56.5%) vs 562/1002 (56.9%) |
16/785 (2.0%) vs
16/784 (2.0%) |