References
  1. Ramanah R, Berger MB, Parratte BM, DeLancey JO. Anatomy and histology of apical support: a literature review concerning cardinal and uterosacral ligaments. Int Urogynecol J. 2012; 23(11):1483-94. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1819-7
  2. Maher , Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 1;10:CD012376.
  3. Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, Nezhat C. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84:885–888.
  4. Pan K, Cao L, Ryan NA, Wang Y, Xu H. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy vs laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2016; 27:93-101.
  5. Ridgeway BM. Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213:802-9.
  6. Takacs EB, Kreder KJ. Sacrocolpopexy: Surgical Technique, Outcomes, and Complications. Curr Urol Rep. 2016; 17(12):90.
  7. Vu D, Haylen BT, Tse K, Farnsworth A. Surgical anatomy of the uterosacral ligament. Int Urogynecol J. 2010; 21(9):1123-8.
  8. Luo J, Betschart C, Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. Using stress MRI to analyze the 3D changes in apical ligament geometry from rest to maximal Valsalva: a pilot study. Int. Urogynecol. J. 25 (2) (2014):197–203.
  9. Summers A, Winkel LA, Hussain HK, DeLancey JO The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194(5):1438-43.
  10. Liang S, Zhu L, Song X, Xu T, Sun Z, Lang J. Long-term outcomes of modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: a 3-year prospective study. Menopause. 2016;23(7):765-70.
  11. Christmann-Schmid C, Koerting I, Ruess E, Faehnle I, Krebs J. Functional outcome after laparoscopic nerve-sparing sacrocolpopexy: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(6):744-750.