References
- Ramanah R, Berger MB, Parratte BM, DeLancey JO. Anatomy and histology
of apical support: a literature review concerning cardinal and
uterosacral ligaments. Int Urogynecol J. 2012; 23(11):1483-94. doi:
10.1007/s00192-012-1819-7
- Maher , Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J.
Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev. 2016; 1;10:CD012376.
- Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, Nezhat C. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for
vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84:885–888.
- Pan K, Cao L, Ryan NA, Wang Y, Xu H. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy
vs laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ
prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2016; 27:93-101.
- Ridgeway BM. Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine
conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol
2015; 213:802-9.
- Takacs EB, Kreder KJ. Sacrocolpopexy: Surgical Technique, Outcomes,
and Complications. Curr Urol Rep. 2016; 17(12):90.
- Vu D, Haylen BT, Tse K, Farnsworth A. Surgical anatomy of the
uterosacral ligament. Int Urogynecol J. 2010; 21(9):1123-8.
- Luo J, Betschart C, Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. Using
stress MRI to analyze the 3D changes in apical ligament geometry from
rest to maximal Valsalva: a pilot study. Int. Urogynecol. J. 25 (2)
(2014):197–203.
- Summers A, Winkel LA, Hussain HK, DeLancey JO The relationship between
anterior and apical compartment support. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;
194(5):1438-43.
- Liang S, Zhu L, Song X, Xu T, Sun Z, Lang J. Long-term outcomes of
modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ
prolapse: a 3-year prospective study. Menopause. 2016;23(7):765-70.
- Christmann-Schmid C, Koerting I, Ruess E, Faehnle I, Krebs J.
Functional outcome after laparoscopic nerve-sparing sacrocolpopexy: a
prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
2018;97(6):744-750.