References
1. Jin YM, Liu SS, Chen J, Chen YN, Ren CC. Robotic radical hysterectomy
is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical
hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. PLoS One.
2018;13(3):e0193033.
2. Zhang SS, Ding T, Cui ZH, Lv Y, Jiang RA. Efficacy of robotic radical
hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and
laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(4):e14171.
3. Shazly SA, Murad MH, Dowdy SC, Gostout BS, Famuyide AO. Robotic
radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review
and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Aug;138(2):457-71.
4. Piedimonte S, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Gotlieb W, Abenhaim HA. Robotic
Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of
Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States. J
Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 2019/03/01/;26(3):551-7.
5. Hoogendam JP, Verheijen RH, Wegner I, Zweemer RP. Oncological outcome
and long-term complications in robot-assisted radical surgery for early
stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study. BJOG. 2014
Nov;121(12):1538-45.
6. Shah CA, Beck T, Liao JB, Giannakopoulos NV, Veljovich D, Paley P.
Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as
compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical
cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6).
7. Sert BM, Boggess JF, Ahmad S, Jackson AL, Stavitzski NM, Dahl AA, et
al. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: A
multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer. Eur J
Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;42(4):513-22.
8. Mendivil AA, Rettenmaier MA, Abaid LN, Brown JV, 3rd, Micha JP, Lopez
KL, et al. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients
treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical
hysterectomy: A five year experience. Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;25(1):66-71.
9. Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, et
al. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for
Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1895-904.
10. Melamed A, Margul DJ, Chen L, Keating NL, Del Carmen MG, Yang J, et
al. Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for
Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1905-14.
11. Cusimano MC, Baxter NN, Gien LT, Moineddin R, Liu N, Dossa F, et al.
Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing
radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul
6.
12. Uppal S, Gehrig P, Vetter MH, Davidson BA, Lees BF, Brunette LL, et
al. Recurrence rates in cervical cancer patients treated with abdominal
versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional
analysis of 700 cases. Journal of Clinical Oncology.
2019;37(15_suppl):5504.
13. National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS). NCRAS
cervical cancer radical hysterectomy analysis May 2019 final
[Internet]. 2019 May 15 [cited 2020 Jan 27]; Available from:
https://www.bgcs.org.uk/ncras-cervical-cancer-radical-hysterectomy-analysis/
14. Alfonzo E, Wallin E, Ekdahl L, Staf C, Radestad AF, Reynisson P, et
al. No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy
for women with early-stage cervical cancer: results from a nationwide
population-based cohort study. Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jul;116:169-77.
15. Matanes E, Abitbol J, Kessous R, Kogan L, Octeau D, Lau S, et al.
Oncologic and Surgical Outcomes of Robotic Versus Open Radical
Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019
Apr;41(4):450-8.
16. Chen L, Liu LP, Wen N, Qiao X, Meng YG. Comparative analysis of
robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. World
J Clin Cases. 2019 Oct 26;7(20):3185-93.
17. Yim GW, Kim SW, Nam EJ, Kim S, Kim YT. Learning curve analysis of
robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: initial
experience at a single institution. J Gynecol Oncol. 2013
Oct;24(4):303-12.
18. Schreuder HW, Zweemer RP, van Baal WM, van de Lande J, Dijkstra JC,
Verheijen RH. From open radical hysterectomy to robot-assisted
laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer:
aspects of a single institution learning curve. Gynecol Surg. 2010
Sep;7(3):253-8.
19. Heo YJ, Kim S, Min KJ, Lee S, Hong JH, Lee JK, et al. The comparison
of surgical outcomes and learning curves of radical hysterectomy by
laparoscopy and robotic system for cervical cancer: an experience of a
single surgeon. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018 Jul;61(4):468-76.
20. Schreuder HW, Wolswijk R, Zweemer RP, Schijven MP, Verheijen RH.
Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured
approach: a systematic review. BJOG. 2012 Jan;119(2):137-49.
21. Abboudi H, Khan MS, Guru KA, Froghi S, de Win G, Van Poppel H, et
al. Learning curves for urological procedures: a systematic review. BJU
Int. 2014 Oct;114(4):617-29.
22. Doumerc N, Yuen C, Savdie R, Rahman MB, Rasiah KK, Pe Benito R, et
al. Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic
surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years. BJU Int.
2010 Aug;106(3):378-84.
23. Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva,
cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 May;105(2):103-4.
24. Hoogendam JP, Hobbelink MG, Veldhuis WB, Verheijen RH, van Diest PJ,
Zweemer RP. Preoperative sentinel node mapping with (99m)Tc-nanocolloid
SPECT-CT significantly reduces the intraoperative sentinel node
retrieval time in robot assisted laparoscopic cervical cancer surgery.
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 May;129(2):389-94.
25. Steiner SH, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Treasure T. Monitoring surgical
performance using risk-adjusted cumulative sum charts. Biostatistics.
2000 Dec;1(4):441-52.
26. Bolsin S, Colson M. The use of the Cusum technique in the assessment
of trainee competence in new procedures. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000
Oct;12(5):433-8.
27. Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Dusek L, Zikan M, Zaal A, Sevcik L, et al.
Prognostic significance of low volume sentinel lymph node disease in
early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Mar;124(3):496-501.
28. Parisi A, Scrucca L, Desiderio J, Gemini A, Guarino S, Ricci F, et
al. Robotic right hemicolectomy: Analysis of 108 consecutive procedures
and multidimensional assessment of the learning curve. Surg Oncol. 2017
Mar;26(1):28-36.
29. Wenzel H, Smolders R, Beltman J, Lambrechts S, Trum H, Yigit R, et
al. EP434 Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after
abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the Netherlands. Int J
Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29(Suppl 4):A280-A1.
30. Steiner SH, Woodall WH. Debate: what is the best method to monitor
surgical performance? BMC Surg. 2016 Apr 5;16:15.
31. van Zanten F, Schraffordt Koops SE, Pasker-de Jong PCM, Lenters E,
Schreuder HWR. Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic
sacrocolpo(recto)pexy: a cumulative sum analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2019 May 29.
32. Liu Y, Li L, Wu M, Ma S, Tan X, Zhong S, et al. The impact of the
surgical routes and learning curve of radical hysterectomy on the
survival outcomes in stage IB cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort
study. Int J Surg. 2019 Aug;68:72-7.
33. Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadiere GB, Nyssen AS. Comparison of
learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic
laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions: implications for
training. Am J Surg. 2007 Jul;194(1):115-21.
34. Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, Carlson MJ, Valmadre S,
Phillips GS, et al. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic
hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Aug;114(2):162-7.
35. Chong GO, Lee YH, Lee HJ, Hong DG, Lee YS. Comparison of the
Long-Term Oncological Outcomes Between the Initial Learning Period of
Robotic and the Experienced Period of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy
for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018
Feb;28(2):226-32.
36. Zaal A, Zweemer RP, Zikan M, Dusek L, Querleu D, Lecuru F, et al.
Pelvic lymphadenectomy improves survival in patients with cervical
cancer with low-volume disease in the sentinel node: a retrospective
multicenter cohort study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Feb;24(2):303-11.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the two groups divided by
the learning curve analysis.