Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Results
Figures 1 to 14 show the testing results of the observed (laboratory
tests results) and ANN predicted values of unsoaked and soaked CBR of
natural soils (A-7-5) and cement-treated soils separately stabilized
with Rice husk ash. These values clearly signify the high precision and
accuracy of the ANN models [15].
[CHART]
Figure 1. Comparison between observed (lab) and predicted unsoaked CBR
values of A-7-5 + RHA +0% cement
[CHART]
Figure 2. Comparison between observed (lab) and predicted unsoaked CBR
values of A-7-5 + RHA + 2% cement
[CHART]
Figure 3. Comparison between observed (lab) and predicted unsoaked CBR
values of A-7-5 + RHA +4% cement
[CHART]
Figure 4. Comparison between observed (lab) and predicted unsoaked CBR
values of A-7-5 + RHA +6% cement
[CHART]
Figure 5. Comparison between observed (lab) and predicted unsoaked CBR
values of A-7-5 + RHA +8% cement
[CHART]
Figure 6. Comparison between observed (lab) and predicted unsoaked CBR
values of A-7-5 + RHA + 10% cement
[CHART]
Figure 7. Comparison between observed (lab) and predicted unsoaked CBR
values of A-7-5 + RHA + 12% cement
[CHART]
Figure 8. Comparison between observed (lab) and predicted soaked CBR
values of A-7-5 + RHA + 0% cement
[CHART]
Figure 9. Comparison between observed (lab) and predicted soaked CBR
values of A-7-5 + RHA + 2% cement
[CHART]
Figure 10. Comparison between observed (lab) and predicted soaked CBR
values of A-7-5 + RHA + 4% cement
[CHART]
Figure 11. Comparison between observed (lab) and predicted soaked CBR
values of A-7-5 + RHA + 6% cement
[CHART]
Figure 12. Comparison between observed (lab) and predicted soaked CBR
values of A-7-5 + RHA + 8% cement
[CHART]
Figure 13. Comparison between observed (lab) and predicted soaked CBR
values of A-7-5 + RHA + 10% cement
[CHART]
Figure 14. Comparison between observed (lab) and predicted soaked CBR
values of A-7-5 + RHA + 12% cement