Discussion

The dilemma now is that observations in cognitive neuroscience   demand quantum computing but that quantum physics rejects this proposal through the common and intuitive argument that quantum coherence can't survive in the hot and wet environment of the brain. This argument
reflects on  empirical physics in  laboratory systems which observation resulted in the creation of quantum mechanics 100 years ago;
a very successful theory for closed system with few disturbances.
Quantum mind theories have been shaped by conceptional difficulties of "classical" quantum mechanics which after all is a empirical description of microscopic phenomena.Over the past 20 years, quantum physics has been evolved quickly.
The hypothosis may seen to conflict with neuroscience in general. For example, neurones which are considered as main contributor to cognition send information via action potential; a classical signal.
However, classical signals can also be observed in quantum computation as result of a measurement during computing or as part of information transfer which is performed using quantum teleportation. Furthermore, topological defects and order can be in the classical domain as we can see in the following.
So far, there has been confusion about the project due to the affinity to the quantum mind theories.