Main Data History
Show Index Toggle 3 comments
  •  Quick Edit
  • Collaboration on the nature of all things

    Oh, an empty article!

    You can get started by double clicking this text block and begin editing. You can also click the Insert button below to add new block elements. Or you can drag and drop an image right onto this text. Happy writing!

    Oh hey, there’s in-line formatting code. I wasn’t expecting that.


    In the beginning, there was a big bang...and then bacteria... (well, technically they were probably closer to Archaea) and a lot later birds and humans... Some authors disagree({The Bible})


    When we look to the individuals of the same variety or sub-variety of our older cultivated plants and animals, one of the first points which strikes us, is, that they generally differ much more from each other, than do the individuals of any one species or variety in a state of nature.

    Phase Time M\(_1\) M\(_2\) \(\Delta M\) P
    1 ZAMS 0 16 15 5.0
    2 Case B 9.89 15.92 14.94 0.14 5.1
    3 ECCB 11.30 3.71 20.86 6.44 42.7
    4 ECHB 18.10 16.76
    5 ICB 18.56 12.85
    6 ECCB 18.56 12.83


    When we reflect on the vast diversity of the plants and animals which have been cultivated, and which have varied during all ages under the most different climates and treatment, I think we are driven to conclude that this greater variability is simply due to our domestic productions having been raised under conditions of life not so uniform as, and somewhat different from, those to which the parent-species have been exposed under nature.

    There is a well-measured constraint on YMCs that we can apply to predict the upper limit radii for the MPCs. Recent high resolution imagining and spectral studies of YMCs have shown these systems to be in or close to equilibrium at ages of \(\sim 1.5 \leq 3\) years \cite{}. (Darwin 1900)