\documentclass[10pt]{article}

\usepackage{fullpage}
\usepackage{setspace}
\usepackage{parskip}
\usepackage{titlesec}
\usepackage[section]{placeins}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage{breakcites}
\usepackage{lineno}
\usepackage{hyphenat}





\PassOptionsToPackage{hyphens}{url}
\usepackage[colorlinks = true,
            linkcolor = blue,
            urlcolor  = blue,
            citecolor = blue,
            anchorcolor = blue]{hyperref}
\usepackage{etoolbox}
\makeatletter
\patchcmd\@combinedblfloats{\box\@outputbox}{\unvbox\@outputbox}{}{%
  \errmessage{\noexpand\@combinedblfloats could not be patched}%
}%
\makeatother


\usepackage[round]{natbib}
\let\cite\citep




\renewenvironment{abstract}
  {{\bfseries\noindent{\abstractname}\par\nobreak}\footnotesize}
  {\bigskip}

\titlespacing{\section}{0pt}{*3}{*1}
\titlespacing{\subsection}{0pt}{*2}{*0.5}
\titlespacing{\subsubsection}{0pt}{*1.5}{0pt}


\usepackage{authblk}


\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[space]{grffile}
\usepackage{latexsym}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{tabulary}
\usepackage{booktabs,array,multirow}
\usepackage{amsfonts,amsmath,amssymb}
\providecommand\citet{\cite}
\providecommand\citep{\cite}
\providecommand\citealt{\cite}
% You can conditionalize code for latexml or normal latex using this.
\newif\iflatexml\latexmlfalse
\providecommand{\tightlist}{\setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}\setlength{\parskip}{0pt}}%

\AtBeginDocument{\DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.pdf,.PDF,.eps,.EPS,.png,.PNG,.tif,.TIF,.jpg,.JPG,.jpeg,.JPEG}}

\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}










\begin{document}

\title{Scales report - compare~IPCC iterest~with scietific~interest}



\author[1]{alon.azulay}%
\affil[1]{Affiliation not available}%


\vspace{-1em}



  
  \date{May 04, 2024}


\begingroup
\let\center\flushleft
\let\endcenter\endflushleft
\maketitle
\endgroup








\sloppy


\section*{1. Introduction}

{\label{434358}}

The~Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is an
international~organization that established in 1988 to provide
"\selectlanguage{english}policymakers with regular assessments of the scientific basis of
climate change, its impacts and future risks, and options for adaptation
and
mitigation".\selectlanguage{english}(\url{http://www.ipcc.ch/news\_and\_events/docs/factsheets/FS\_what\_ipcc.pdf}).~In
the three parts of the report, which include: 1) a scientific basis, 2)
impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, 3)mitigation, various natural
and social phenomena are mentioned in different contexts associated with
climate change. In order to examine whether the scientific interest in
various natural and social phenomena is related to climate change, we
compare the general scientific interest and the interest of the IPCC in
phenomena.

The purpose of the study is to examine whether the scientific interest
in climatic phenomena shows a trend similar to that of IPCC in these
phenomena. The importance of this examination is the question of whether
the scientific interest in climatic phenomena derives from climate
change. My assumption was that the interest of the IPCC would show a
similar trend to the general scientific interest in climatic phenomena,
that is, the scientific interest in climatic phenomena is related to
climate change. It is important to note that the IPCC goal described
above is the different aspects of climate change and does not
necessarily reflect scientific interest. In other words, it may be that
scientific interest and publications on a particular phenomenon do not
relate to issues of climate change but to other issues such as climate,
weather, biology, history, etc.~

The relevance of the research question in the context of the climate
system is an understanding of the scientific research interest between
2003 and 2013 and the importance and dominance of climate change in that
research. The following results can be seen from the subsequent results
that the scales I have used that include scientific interest and the
interest of IPCC can suggest the trend of scientific engagement in
climate change, which is a phenomenon that has a wide impact on society.

\par\null

\par\null

\section*{2. Definitions}

{\label{434358}}

Two scales were used in the work: IPCC~Interest and scientific interest.
In order to examine the scientific interest of the phenomena examined, I
used Google scholar and checked the number of articles published between
2003-2013 which are about ten years prior to the departure of the report
of the IPCC which is the source of the scale to which I compared the
results. In addition, in order to obtain more reliable and accurate
results, the search is done in articles that are written in the English
and include in their titles the names of the phenomena examined.

The second scale I used is the IPCC interest. In order to find the
interest of the IPCC in the phenomena examined, I used the last report
of the IPCC which consists of three parts (they can be listed). In each
part, I checked the number of times the phenomenon appears in the report
by using Cntl + F~searching.~

In the table below, you can see the keywords used and the number of
articles found on Google scholar and the number of mentions of the
phenomena in different parts of the ~IPCC report:

\par\null\selectlanguage{english}
\begin{table}[h!]
\centering
\normalsize\begin{tabulary}{1.0\textwidth}{CCCCCCCC}
phnomenon & IPCC report (physical science basis) & IPCC report (Impact, adaptation and vulnerability) & IPCC report (mitigation) & Total mention in IPCC & Total article in google scholar & Normal IPCC & Normal google scholar \\
Drought & 336 & 1128 & 25 & 1489 & 19700 & 100 & 100 \\
Monsoon & 716 & 139 & 3 & 858 & 7020 & 57.6 & 35.6 \\
Tropical cyclone & 316 & 196 & 0 & 512 & 3250 & 34.4 & 16.5 \\
Heat wave & 116 & 328 & 7 & 451 & 1070 & 30.2 & 5.4 \\
NAO & 213 & 32 & 12 & 257 & 889 & 17.3 & 4.5 \\
Urban adaptation & 0 & 98 & 0 & 98 & 416 & 6.6 & 2.1 \\
MJO & 57 & 4 & 0 & 61 & 431 & 4.1 & 2.2 \\
\end{tabulary}
\caption{{This is a caption
{\label{899896}}%
}}
\end{table}The symptoms were selected from the course's database, but there were
several changes in the phenomena: 1) City adaptation was replaced by
Urban Adaptation because this is the accepted term in IPCC and the
Scientific Compass; An Indian monsoon was replaced by a monsoon, meaning
that it includes not only the Indian monsoon, it is done in order to
obtain more accurate results because the monsoon is sometimes used for
Indian monsoon and sometimes for another monsoon.

\section*{}

{\label{434358}}

\section*{3. Scale Diagram}

{\label{434358}}\par\null\selectlanguage{english}
\begin{figure}[h!]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=1.00\columnwidth]{figures/sss/scales-diagram}
\caption{{The X and W axes present the normal value of values obtained in relation
to drought, which is the most commonly mentioned phenomenon in both
indices. The values were calculated by the following formula:
{\label{429433}}%
}}
\end{center}
\end{figure}

\par\null

Because the two axes that examine the issue of IPCC and the scientific
interest have been accepted by a different method, normalization of
values makes it possible to compare the number of times the phenomenon
is mentioned in Ipsisis (The interest of the IPCC) to the number of
articles that include the name of the phenomenon in their titles in the
years 2003-2013 (scientific interest)

\par\null

\section*{}

{\label{434358}}

\section*{4.Summary and Discussion}

{\label{434358}}

\section*{}

{\label{434358}}

\section*{References}

{\label{434358}}\par\null

\selectlanguage{english}
\FloatBarrier
\end{document}

