Background and Purpose Vancomycin is one of the most common antibiotics administered in the hospital setting, yet acute kidney injury is a major limiting factor. Common combinations of antibiotics with vancomycin have been reported to worsen and improve vancomycin-induced kidney injury. We aimed to study the impact of flucloxacillin and imipenem-cilastatin on kidney injury when combined with vancomycin in our translational rat model. Experimental Approach Male Sprague-Dawley rats received allometrically scaled (1) vancomycin (2) flucloxacillin, (3) vancomycin+flucloxacillin, (4) vancomycin+imipenem-cilastatin, or (5) saline for 4 days. Vancomycin was administered intravenously and flucloxacillin or imipenem-cilastatin were administered intraperitoneally. Kidney injury was evaluated via drug accumulation and urinary biomarkers including urinary output, kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), clusterin, and osteopontin. Relationships between vancomycin accumulation in the kidney and urinary kidney injury biomarkers were explored. Key Results Urinary output increased every study day for vancomycin+flucloxacillin; whereas in the vancomycin group it was elevated after the first dose only. In the vancomycin+flucloxacillin group, urinary KIM-1/24h increased on all days compared to vancomycin. In the vancomycin+imipenem-cilastatin group, urinary KIM-1/24h was decreased on days 1 and 2 compared to vancomycin. Similar trends were observed for clusterin. More vancomycin accumulated in the kidney with vancomycin+flucloxacillin compared to vancomycin and vancomycin+imipenem-cilastatin. The accumulation of vancomycin in the kidney tissue correlated with increasing urinary KIM-1 (4-parameter Hill Slope, R2=0.7985). Conclusion and Implications Vancomycin+flucloxacillin caused more kidney injury compared to vancomycin alone and vancomycin+imipenem-cilastatin in a translational rat model as determined by multiple kidney injury biomarkers. The combination of vancomycin+imipenem-cilastatin was nephroprotective.

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is understood to be a cause of significant disease in older adults and children. Further analysis of RSV in younger adults may reveal further insight into its role as an important pathogen in all age groups. Methods: We identified, through laboratory data, adults who tested positive for either influenza or RSV between January 2017 and June 2019 at a single Australian hospital. We compared baseline demographics, testing patterns, hospitalisations and outcomes between these groups. Results: Of 1128 influenza and 193 RSV patients, the RSV cohort was older (mean age 54.7 vs. 64.9, p<0.001) and were more comorbid as determined by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (2.4 vs. 3.2, p<0.001). Despite this, adults under 65 with RSV were equally likely to be admitted compared with their influenza counterparts (70.3% vs. 77.3%, p=0.174). Testing occurred later in RSV hospitalisations as measured by the proportion tested in the emergency department (80.3% vs. 69.2%, p<0.001) and this was strongly associated with differences in presenting phenotype (the presence of fever). RSV was the biggest predictor of 6 month representation, with age and comorbidities predicting this less strongly. Conclusion: RSV is a significant contributor to morbidity and hospitalisation, sometimes outweighing that of influenza, and is not limited to elderly cohorts. Understanding key differences in the clinical syndrome and consequent testing paradigms may allow better detection and potentially treatment of RSV to reduce individual morbidity and health system burden. This growing area of research helps quantify the need for directed therapies for RSV.