In the methods section, authors present the sample used in the analysis. Although 93% response rate sounds great, readers don't know the total number of people involved in these forums. If 45 people were included in the sample, how many participate in the forums in total? Additionally, I recommend introducing a note about who was left out of this sample and why. It will be of particular interest for readers to know what kind of actors excluded themselves from the study and to know more about the profile of those who have not attended at least two of the last six plenary meetings. Were they powerful actors or not? If they were not, could the study be leaving those with less power underrepresented?