(#9bis) TS="building product?") OR (TS="construction product?") OR (TS ="building material?") OR (TS ="construction material?"): 17.759
(#9) and (#14) is a reasonable number of papers (205, that doubles the intersection between (#1) and (#11), 104 papers):
In the complete form, we write:
(#17) AND (#14) = [(TS="building product") OR (TS="construction product") OR (TS ="building material") OR (TS ="construction material")] AND [(TS="rot") OR (TS="rotting") OR(TS="mould") OR (TS="fungi") OR (TS="moisture")]: 205
Is this set of paper enough? we could restrict it with other key-words, like "decay", "degradation", ... or "health", "sick building syndrome" and similar others, but the number is reasonable and we can look at everyone of the 205, reading its title and, if not clear, the abstract, to identify really interesting papers.