loading page

The Impact of Intracervical Terlipressin on Intravasation and Venous Embolization During Hysteroscopic Surgery: A Comprehensive Randomised Controlled Study
  • +5
  • Hesselink L.,
  • Overdijk L.E.,
  • Paul van Kesteren,
  • Haan P.,
  • Karstens L.,
  • Riezebos R.K,
  • Franssen E.J.F,
  • B.M.P. Rademaker
Hesselink L.
OLVG
Author Profile
Overdijk L.E.
OLVG

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Paul van Kesteren
OLVG
Author Profile
Haan P.
OLVG
Author Profile
Karstens L.
OLVG
Author Profile
Riezebos R.K
OLVG
Author Profile
Franssen E.J.F
OLVG
Author Profile
B.M.P. Rademaker
OLVG
Author Profile

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether intracervical injection of terlipressin during hysteroscopic surgery could reduce the amount of intravasation, the incidence and severity of gas embolism, and the COHb levels in the blood. Design: Randomised double-blind controlled trial. Setting and population: Patients who were scheduled for transcervical resection of type 1 or type 2 myomas (TCR-M), or for extensive transcervical endometrium resection (TCR-E). Methods: Patients were randomised to receive either terlipressin 0.85 mg or placebo injections intracervically at the beginning of the procedure. The amount of intravasation and level of COHb was measured at the end of the procedure. The incidence and severity of gas embolisms was determined during the procedure by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Study groups were compared using an Independent Samples T-Test or a Mann-Whitney U test as indicated. Main Outcome Measures: Amount of intravasation, incidence and severity of gas embolisms, blood COHb levels. Results: No significant differences were found in intravasation volume, venous emboli and post-surgery COHb between study groups. There was a trend towards more severe embolisms (grade IV embolisms: 12 versus 6, p = 0.08), paradoxical embolisms (4 versus 2, p = 0.55) and a shorter operation time (mean of 43 versus 36 minutes, p = 0.09) in patients who received terlipressin compared to placebo. Conclusions: This study could not demonstrate a clear beneficial effect of cervical terlipressin administration. However, further research is needed to investigate if terlipressin can reduce operation time, severe embolisms and the need for redo procedures.