The efficacy and adverse events of arsenic trioxide for the patients
with myelodysplactic syndrome: a systematic review and component network
meta-analysis
Abstract
To systematically evaluate efficacy of regimens containing arsenic
trioxide (ATO) for the patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and
explore optimal combination. Randomized clinical trials about regimens
containing ATO were retrieved from China National Knowledge
Infrastructure, Embase, PubMed et al. With odds ratio as the effect
size, network meta-analysis and component network meta-analysis was
conducted by utilization of R and ‘netmeta’ package, after study
selection, quality assessment and data extraction. As the result,
thirty-eight RCTs were included with a total of 2089 patients, including
1257 treated by ATO containing regimen. With support therapy alone as
reference, insignificant inconsistency and heterogeneity was observed.
Although NMA did not demonstrate better efficacy of ATO alone, result of
CNMA indicated that ATO was effective in improvement of ORR
[OR=2.03(1.56, 2.64)] and CR [OR =1.66(1.24, 2.22)]. Five
ATO-containing regimens reported could effectively improve ORR, some of
them benefit in CR or HI as well. ATO+T+TCM was regarded as the optimal
combination, which improved both ORR [OR=3.11(2.08, 4.66)], CR
[OR=7.09(1.53, 32.82)] and HI [OR=2.02(1.24, 3.27)] in theory.
ATO did not increase the risk of common adverse events compared to
supportive therapy [(OR=0.90(0.67, 1.21)]. In conclusion, ATO is an
effective and well tolerant option for patients with myelodysplastic
syndrome.