loading page

Aged and more severe allergic rhinitis patients are less likely to the use information and communication technologies for illness management and monitoring
  • +12
  • Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda,
  • Jean Bousquet,
  • Zouina Sarfraz,
  • Azza Sarfraz,
  • Monica Rodriguez Gonzalez,
  • Anna Bedbrook,
  • Nelson Rosario,
  • Benjamin Zepeda-Ortega,
  • Guillermo Guidos Fogelbach,
  • Ulbio Alcivar Molina,
  • Miguel Felix,
  • Emanuel Vanegas,
  • Karla Robles-Velasco,
  • Luc Zimmermann J,
  • Antonio Gavilanes WD
Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda
Universidad Espíritu Santo

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Jean Bousquet
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Author Profile
Zouina Sarfraz
Research and Publications
Author Profile
Azza Sarfraz
Aga Khan University
Author Profile
Monica Rodriguez Gonzalez
Hospital Español de México
Author Profile
Anna Bedbrook
ARIA & MASK-air
Author Profile
Nelson Rosario
University of Parana
Author Profile
Benjamin Zepeda-Ortega
Pediatric Allergist Private Practice Angeles Lomas Hospital Huixquilucan Mexican State
Author Profile
Guillermo Guidos Fogelbach
Instituto Politecnico Nacional
Author Profile
Ulbio Alcivar Molina
Hospital Luis Vernaza
Author Profile
Miguel Felix
Universidad Espíritu Santo
Author Profile
Emanuel Vanegas
Universidad Espíritu Santo
Author Profile
Karla Robles-Velasco
Universidad Espíritu Santo
Author Profile
Luc Zimmermann J
University of Maastricht
Author Profile
Antonio Gavilanes WD
University of Maastricht
Author Profile

Abstract

Background: Information and communication technologies (ICTs) improve patient-centered care and are routinely used in Allergic Rhinitis (AR), but patients’ preferences and attitudes are unexplored. This study examines AR-related information preferences and ICT use by AR patients. Methods: A survey-based cross-sectional study was carried out in Ecuador in seven centers of reference of allergic disease. Participants were 18 or older, diagnosed with AR, and had access to ICT and the internet. Descriptive and binomial logistic regression were done. A value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 217 patients were included. 47% used ICTs to learn about AR, 38.2% found it useful. 75% disagreed that ICTs reduce doctor’s appointments. Individuals with poorer quality of life were 27% more likely to utilize ICTs to contact their doctor and 23% more likely to be interested in AR-related content. Patients with long-term AR or other allergies were less likely to use ICTs. Higher education and lower quality of life may increase AR app adoption by 4.8 times. Academic preparation five-fold increased ICT use for health provider communication. Mild-persistent allergic rhinitis 12 times enhanced the probabilities of using ICTs to share experiences and communicate with other patients. Conclusions: Our study found that moderate-to-severe AR individuals are not interested in information despite ICTs’ potential benefits. Consequently, allergists should use evidence-based resources and establish new technological options for content, follow-up, and emotional support for AR patients in Ecuador.