loading page

Intensive blood pressure control for patients over age 60: a pooled analysis of the SPRINT, STEP, and ACCORD BP randomized controlled trials
  • +3
  • Xiaoting Li,
  • Jiejun Zhang,
  • Zhenhua Xing,
  • Qiming Liu,
  • Shenghua Zhou,
  • Yichao Xiao
Xiaoting Li
The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Author Profile
Jiejun Zhang
The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Author Profile
Zhenhua Xing
The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Author Profile
Qiming Liu
The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Author Profile
Shenghua Zhou
Author Profile
Yichao Xiao
The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile

Abstract

Abstract Aim: Blood pressure-lowering treatment is beneficial for preventing cardiovascular disease risk among elderly patients. However, the most appropriate BP targets for elderly patients are controversial. Methods: We extracted the individual-level data of participants over 60 years from the SPRINT study and ACCORD study first and then conducted a meta-analysis of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and adverse events (hypotension and syncope) and renal outcomes across the SPRINT, STEP, and ACCORD BP trials, which included 18,806 participants over 60. Participants were randomized to receive standard BP treatment or intensive BP treatment. Results: In this meta-analysis, intensive treatment exhibited a nominal trend toward decreases in all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-1.26; p=0.87) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.54-1.08; p=0.13). The incidence of MACEs (HR: 0.83; 95%CI: 0.74-0.94; p=0.003) and stroke (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.56-0.88; p=0.002) was reduced. Intensive treatment had an inconspicuous effect on coronary disease (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.69-1.10; p=0.24) and heart failure (HR: 0.70; 95%CI: 0.40-1.22; p=0.21). Intensive treatment increased the risk of hypotension (HR: 1.46; 95%CI: 1.12-1.91; p=0.006) and syncope (HR: 1.43; 95%CI: 1.06-1.93; p=0.02). Intensive treatment did not increase the risk of either impaired kidney function among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.41-2.34; p=0.96) or without CKD (HR: 1.77; 95%CI: 0.48-6.56; p=0.40) at baseline. Conclusions: Intensive BP goals reduced the incidence of MACEs and increased the risk of adverse events without significant mortality or renal outcome changes.