loading page

The accuracy of two algorithms of artificial intelligence based on neural networks and the CaRDIA-X algorithm in the identification of electronic implantable cardiac devices by chest x-rays.
  • +5
  • Laura Fernanda Gilón Córdoba,
  • Juan Felipe Betancourt Rodríguez,
  • Angel García,
  • Edward Andrés Cáceres,
  • Sebastián Moreno-Mercado,
  • Diego Armando Ospina Buitrago,
  • Sara Gómez,
  • Peter Olejua
Laura Fernanda Gilón Córdoba
Hospital Universitario San Ignacio

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Juan Felipe Betancourt Rodríguez
Hospital Universitario San Ignacio
Author Profile
Angel García
Hospital Universitario San Ignacio
Author Profile
Edward Andrés Cáceres
Hospital Universitario San Ignacio
Author Profile
Sebastián Moreno-Mercado
Hospital Universitario San Ignacio
Author Profile
Diego Armando Ospina Buitrago
Hospital Universitario San Ignacio
Author Profile
Sara Gómez
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Author Profile
Peter Olejua
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Author Profile

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we aim to describe the diagnostic accuracy of two applications neural networks-based system and a visual algorithm performed by different evaluators to identify the manufacturer of electronic implantable cardiac devices by chest x-rays. Background: cardiac rhythm devices frequently require interrogation, and they have different software depending on the manufacturer. Currently, there are a visual algorithm and two applications based on artificial intelligence for the identification of the manufacturer from chest radiographs. Methods: Retrospective trial between January 2010 and December 2021 at a single institution. Chest radiographs were obtained from patients with cardiac devices; they were cropped and resized to 224 by 224 pixels. Then, they were analyzed using the applications Pacemaker ID ® with a cell phone, Pacemaker ID ® web and PPMnn ® web, and the visual algorithm CaRDIA-X ® performed by evaluators at different levels of training. Results: 400 radiographic images with cardiac devices were collected comprising 4 manufacturers and 40 different models. The agreement for Pacemaker ID ® with a cell phone was 90.6% ( p <0.001), for Pacemaker ID ® web was 81.2% ( p < 0.001); and for PPMnn ® web was 82% ( p < 0.001). The agreement from the CaRDIA-X ® algorithm performed by 4 evaluators ranged from 73.8% to 97.7% ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of applications based on neural networks offers a good agreement in the identification of the manufacturer and is a tool for clinical use. In our paper, the visual algorithm has a better agreement in identifying the manufacturer and it doesn’t require much training.